𝖑𝖚 — CS2 Stats

76561199137473099[U:1:1177207371]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

340Tracked matches59%Win rate2025Tracked since

699Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAll-Rounder

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+4Tracked matches · now 340

−1.4ppWin rate · 60.7% → 59.3%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 20 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

32Days played since 2026-04-20

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning54

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–36–11Last 10053%Win rateTWLWWWLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −7.6pp headshot accuracy · −90ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–1–1 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

5–3–2 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

13–5–2 · 65% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 609ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.8

Utility4.9

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels3.7

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.6° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning5.4

Utility4.9

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time603ms−9ms

first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms

Headshot accuracy19.4%+2.4%

first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 10–13 · vertigo, 23 Apr →

37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · office, 2 Jun →

453msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · mirage, 27 Apr →

13–0Biggest win · inferno, 26 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 80% over 5vertigoWeakest map · 48% over 21

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	22	11–11	50%	0.04
vertigo	B	21	10–11	48%	0.06
office	B	12	6–6	50%	0.05
cache	S	9	6–3	67%	0.06
anubis	B	8	4–4	50%	0.02
nuke	B	8	4–4	50%	0.06
mirage	B	6	3–3	50%	0.04
dust2	A	5	3–2	60%	0.04
train	S	5	4–1	80%	0.05
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.01
ancient	—	2	2–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

13,045Lifetime kills

1.42K/D · Top 5% of tracked players

612Matches

42.3%Match win rate

51.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players

0.0%Shot accuracy

1,337MVPs

274Hours (in match)

384Bombs planted

149Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-473,904

M4A4 / M4A1-S2,342

MP71,453

AWP638

P2000 / USP-S555

Galil AR493

Glock-18461

FAMAS342

P90256

MP9234

Lifetime map wins

1,221vertigo

814inferno

492dust2

480nuke

318office

160train

10ar_baggage

7ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy

44.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

48.7%Spray accuracy

82.6%Counter-strafing

10.6°Preaim

598msReaction time

40.9%T opening success

39.3%CT opening success

0.37Enemies flashed / flash

4.4%Flash assists

12.31HE damage / grenade

8.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3742 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 39.2745% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
office	12–12	-0.04	4%	10 Sept →
office	13–7	0.02	9%	8 Sept →
office	8–13	0.09	17%	8 Sept →
office	13–5	0.03	17%	8 Sept →
inferno	13–1	0.15	16%	20 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	0.03	9%	20 Aug →
overpass	8–13	-0.03	19%	20 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	0.06	8%	26 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.00	23%	3 Jun →
vertigo	13–3	0.15	32%	3 Jun →
vertigo	13–9	0.09	15%	3 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.03	18%	2 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	15%	2 Jun →
office	13–3	0.10	37%	2 Jun →
vertigo	13–7	0.13	24%	1 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.04	30%	1 Jun →
anubis	13–6	0.06	20%	27 May →
anubis	13–6	0.02	30%	27 May →
office	13–6	0.02	18%	26 May →
inferno	13–0	0.07	24%	26 May →
office	13–7	0.09	33%	26 May →
vertigo	9–13	0.09	15%	26 May →
vertigo	13–6	0.11	16%	25 May →
inferno	13–6	-0.00	20%	25 May →
vertigo	5–13	-0.02	14%	23 May →
inferno	11–13	0.03	19%	23 May →
vertigo	5–13	0.03	28%	23 May →
office	12–12	0.00	19%	19 May →
office	7–13	0.18	28%	18 May →
inferno	9–13	0.06	17%	18 May →
cache	13–3	0.07	25%	18 May →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	14%	14 May →
vertigo	13–7	0.02	10%	14 May →
office	13–1	0.04	9%	14 May →
office	12–12	0.03	9%	13 May →
office	4–12	0.00	18%	13 May →
nuke	13–7	0.06	12%	12 May →
inferno	13–11	0.15	13%	12 May →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	13%	12 May →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	18%	12 May →
ancient	13–1	0.04	11%	12 May →
inferno	12–16	-0.06	13%	12 May →
inferno	13–11	0.02	13%	11 May →
cache	5–8	0.07	13%	11 May →
cache	13–7	0.06	14%	9 May →
cache	13–5	0.06	7%	8 May →
mirage	13–11	0.13	26%	7 May →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	23%	7 May →
vertigo	13–11	-0.01	21%	5 May →
vertigo	13–11	0.02	11%	2 May →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	15%	29 Apr →
cache	13–3	0.06	32%	29 Apr →
cache	9–13	0.11	32%	29 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.04	20%	29 Apr →
dust2	8–13	0.04	18%	29 Apr →
cache	13–7	0.04	17%	29 Apr →
cache	6–13	0.04	19%	29 Apr →
cache	13–7	0.03	20%	29 Apr →
anubis	12–12	0.08	11%	28 Apr →
inferno	8–13	0.01	9%	28 Apr →
dust2	13–7	0.06	20%	28 Apr →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	14%	28 Apr →
vertigo	10–13	0.06	18%	28 Apr →
vertigo	2–13	-0.04	14%	28 Apr →
train	5–12	0.08	14%	28 Apr →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	17%	27 Apr →
vertigo	4–13	0.03	16%	27 Apr →
vertigo	12–12	0.04	14%	26 Apr →
overpass	11–13	0.01	18%	26 Apr →
vertigo	13–9	0.18	22%	25 Apr →
train	13–11	0.06	22%	25 Apr →
nuke	13–7	0.12	22%	25 Apr →
dust2	0–13	-0.02	14%	25 Apr →
inferno	13–4	0.11	29%	25 Apr →
anubis	13–9	0.07	17%	25 Apr →
vertigo	11–13	0.07	18%	25 Apr →
inferno	2–13	-0.03	19%	24 Apr →
nuke	9–13	0.10	13%	24 Apr →
vertigo	8–13	0.05	12%	24 Apr →
anubis	13–5	-0.00	18%	24 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.15	19%	24 Apr →
nuke	13–4	0.07	18%	24 Apr →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	16%	24 Apr →
inferno	12–12	0.10	14%	23 Apr →
inferno	2–0	0.00	0%	23 Apr →
vertigo	13–6	0.07	11%	23 Apr →
nuke	13–6	0.01	14%	23 Apr →
inferno	12–12	-0.02	14%	23 Apr →
vertigo	10–13	0.20	22%	23 Apr →
inferno	10–13	0.01	16%	22 Apr →
mirage	12–12	-0.01	15%	22 Apr →
train	13–7	0.11	17%	22 Apr →
train	13–8	0.00	21%	22 Apr →
train	13–4	-0.00	19%	22 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.09	17%	21 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.11	14%	21 Apr →
inferno	13–3	-0.00	13%	21 Apr →
inferno	12–12	0.05	24%	20 Apr →
inferno	13–4	0.04	22%	20 Apr →
nuke	12–12	0.08	17%	20 Apr →