baljeet

baljeet — CS2 Stats

76561199135715316[U:1:1175449588]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,864Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
7,730Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,555Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#80585 of 223331 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 1,064 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 20 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,555 -2,297 20 Aug17 Sept · 19 days played
16,93621,852peak 21,85220 Aug17 Sept
22,086Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,064Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-08-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,064
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 137 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,297 below peak (21,852)
  • -2,297 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 445 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,548), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate46.9%41.9%42.7%above
Shot accuracy8.1%12.2%11.2%3.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.900.980.990.10 short
Match win rate44.4%43.3%43.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbaljeetFACEITLevel 3 · 1,064 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER19,555 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,064csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning53
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4159Last 10041%Win rateLLWLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.1pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility2.4
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch1.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.3
Utility2.4
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time579ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 11–13 · mirage, 26 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · nuke, 5 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · mirage, 15 Sept
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 22 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 50% over 8infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB36171947%-0.00
dust2C2291341%-0.00
ancientD134931%0.00
nukeC114736%0.00
anubisB84450%0.02
cacheC52340%-0.02
infernoD51420%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

84,388Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
4,768Matches
44.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
46.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
8.1%Shot accuracy
8,401MVPs
7,730Hours (in match)
2,010Bombs planted
1,053Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,233
AWP6,794
MAC-102,531
SSG 082,384
MP92,250
Knife1,766

Lifetime map wins

6,361dust2
4,694nuke
4,333inferno
960train
816vertigo
69cbble
65office
56lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

509Matches
47%Win rate
0.72Avg K/D
60.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18449%0.7011.9
Dust29542%0.7011.6
Ancient6745%0.7311.8
Anubis5742%0.7211.1
Inferno4553%0.7913.4
Nuke2861%0.7411.5
Cache1436%0.7011.1
Overpass967%0.549.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
69.0%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
569msReaction time
44.4%T opening success
40.4%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
6.85HE damage / grenade
4.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2748 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–160.0317%17 Sept
dust210–13-0.0510%17 Sept
cache13–7-0.039%17 Sept
ancient12–160.0431%17 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0418%17 Sept
dust213–6-0.0233%17 Sept
ancient7–130.0431%17 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0713%17 Sept
mirage13–10-0.089%16 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0637%16 Sept
anubis3–13-0.039%16 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0129%16 Sept
dust29–130.0021%16 Sept
dust216–130.0519%15 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0617%15 Sept
mirage13–50.0031%15 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0422%15 Sept
mirage13–10.005%15 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0315%15 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0319%15 Sept
nuke13–90.0122%14 Sept
inferno11–130.0229%14 Sept
dust210–130.0139%14 Sept
dust216–13-0.0112%14 Sept
anubis13–60.0629%14 Sept
dust213–11-0.0628%14 Sept
mirage13–90.0320%13 Sept
anubis13–20.1526%13 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0331%13 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0317%13 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0435%13 Sept
mirage13–50.1317%13 Sept
ancient13–80.1224%12 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0325%12 Sept
cache8–13-0.0311%12 Sept
nuke13–80.0917%12 Sept
dust23–13-0.0121%11 Sept
mirage10–130.0217%11 Sept
mirage2–130.0926%11 Sept
mirage13–80.0215%11 Sept
anubis16–14-0.0417%10 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0018%10 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0514%9 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0127%9 Sept
dust24–13-0.1128%9 Sept
inferno8–13-0.1025%6 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0722%6 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0331%6 Sept
mirage13–16-0.069%6 Sept
dust213–9-0.0119%6 Sept
mirage13–100.0328%5 Sept
cache10–13-0.0217%5 Sept
dust213–80.1421%5 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0550%5 Sept
mirage11–130.0525%4 Sept
dust213–60.0115%4 Sept
ancient13–110.0925%4 Sept
nuke13–16-0.0316%27 Aug
mirage11–130.0430%27 Aug
mirage13–50.0533%27 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0419%27 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0022%27 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0314%27 Aug
mirage13–110.0327%26 Aug
mirage11–130.1822%26 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0018%25 Aug
mirage13–100.0724%25 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0530%25 Aug
cache13–10.0516%25 Aug
cache3–13-0.0629%25 Aug
dust26–13-0.0117%25 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0411%25 Aug
dust211–13-0.0321%25 Aug
mirage5–130.0932%24 Aug
dust26–130.0621%23 Aug
dust213–60.0230%23 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0138%23 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0123%23 Aug
dust213–50.1321%23 Aug
ancient13–60.0331%22 Aug
dust24–13-0.0412%22 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0330%22 Aug
dust210–13-0.0618%22 Aug
nuke7–130.0120%22 Aug
nuke13–00.1140%22 Aug
dust26–13-0.0336%22 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0325%22 Aug
mirage7–130.0020%22 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0721%22 Aug
nuke0–13-0.0423%21 Aug
mirage1–13-0.1340%21 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0625%21 Aug
inferno5–130.0028%21 Aug
dust24–13-0.0115%21 Aug
nuke7–130.0121%21 Aug
anubis8–130.0312%21 Aug
mirage16–140.0114%21 Aug
dust211–130.0225%20 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0311%20 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0337%20 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →