1rv1n7Zz

1rv1n7Zz — CS2 Stats

76561199134257652[U:1:1173991924]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,402Tracked matches41%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,458Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,836Top 25% of 203,074 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23806 of 250058 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,318 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1060Premier CS Rating · 23,776 → 24,836

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,836 +3,256 14 Aug – 6 Oct · 29 days played
21,36626,226peak 26,22614 Aug6 Oct
26,358Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,318Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-08-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,318
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 33 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,390 below peak (26,226)
  • -168 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 164 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches50——
Win rate52%——
K/D0.79——
Headshot %51%——

Measured 3 Sep 2026 → 6 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,885), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate46.0%45.7%46.8%meets
Shot accuracy0.8%12.7%13.0%12.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.891.051.060.17 short
Match win rate53.9%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG1rv1n7ZzFACEITLevel 7 · 1,318 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER24,836 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,318csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning59
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateWWWLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility6.3
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 39% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.9
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time564ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 16 Aug →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 28 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · ancient, 27 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 2 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
8–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 61% over 18mirageWeakest map · 43% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2812–1643%-0.02
dust2B2312–1152%-0.01
ancientA1811–761%-0.03
infernoB115–645%-0.01
anubisA74–357%-0.01
nukeA74–357%-0.03
cacheB63–350%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 28). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,471Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
3,103Matches
53.9%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 7 players
46.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
0.8%Shot accuracy
6,764MVPs
1,458Hours (in match)
2,172Bombs planted
774Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,044dust2
6,806inferno
2,141nuke
1,163vertigo
250train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

419Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
80.7ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12649%0.9915.2
Dust210048%1.0415.4
Ancient6656%1.1216.7
Inferno5250%1.1615.7
Nuke2756%0.9915.9
Anubis1771%1.0914.2
Overpass1741%1.1218.1
Cache1145%0.9415.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
75.6%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
558msReaction time
63.5%T opening success
39.3%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
8.04HE damage / grenade
12.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.33% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0415%6 Oct →
mirage13–110.0119%6 Oct →
anubis13–110.0220%6 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0718%5 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0610%5 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0024%5 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0424%5 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0635%4 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0220%4 Oct →
ancient13–40.0122%4 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0512%4 Oct →
dust213–80.0224%4 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0925%4 Oct →
mirage3–130.0318%3 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0421%2 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0220%2 Oct →
mirage13–1-0.0114%2 Oct →
inferno5–130.0126%2 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0116%2 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0018%2 Oct →
dust213–110.0128%2 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0617%1 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0416%1 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0313%1 Oct →
inferno15–150.0227%30 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0121%30 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0221%29 Sept →
mirage3–130.0227%29 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0234%29 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0621%28 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.076%28 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0136%28 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0414%28 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0128%27 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0218%27 Sept →
cache4–130.0221%27 Sept →
dust214–160.0421%27 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0016%27 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0115%27 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0720%27 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0016%27 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0419%26 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.079%25 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0110%25 Sept →
mirage6–130.0216%25 Sept →
mirage13–50.0226%25 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0525%24 Sept →
anubis13–50.0515%24 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0612%24 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0724%15 Sept →
ancient13–40.0322%15 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0113%8 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0317%8 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0415%6 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0112%1 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0819%1 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0220%31 Aug →
inferno13–70.0518%31 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0017%31 Aug →
dust215–19-0.0116%31 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.046%27 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0425%27 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0519%27 Aug →
inferno13–40.0129%26 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0516%22 Aug →
dust214–160.0428%22 Aug →
ancient13–40.0615%21 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0030%21 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0323%21 Aug →
mirage13–90.0314%21 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0720%21 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0315%21 Aug →
ancient13–90.0122%21 Aug →
mirage11–130.008%21 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0515%20 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0011%20 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0430%20 Aug →
inferno6–130.0128%20 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0420%19 Aug →
dust213–70.0020%19 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0629%19 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0219%19 Aug →
nuke13–60.0130%18 Aug →
ancient13–100.0213%18 Aug →
mirage13–20.0117%18 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0517%18 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0113%17 Aug →
mirage13–80.0131%17 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0311%17 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0713%17 Aug →
cache16–140.0023%17 Aug →
dust213–20.1233%16 Aug →
mirage17–19-0.0111%16 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0120%16 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0720%16 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0219%16 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0633%15 Aug →
dust213–90.0024%15 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0320%15 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0135%14 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.