ItzTr1ggsss2k

ItzTr1ggsss2k — CS2 Stats

DK76561199130762571[U:1:1170496843]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

953Tracked matches56%Win rate2021Tracked since
4,421Hours in CS50Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+26Tracked matches · now 953
−9.8ppWin rate · 65.4% → 55.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 3 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,554 -427 3 Apr8 Jun · 6 days played
19,55320,981peak 20,9813 Apr8 Jun
20,981Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2026-04-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,643), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate52.4%41.3%41.9%above
Shot accuracy7.8%12.7%12.2%4.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.160.950.98above
Match win rate50.1%42.5%43.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGItzTr1ggsss2kFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning68
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY494110Last 10049%Win rateWWLTLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · +67ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility4.8
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels4.9

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.8
Utility4.8
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact6.9

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time564ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–0 · vertigo, 6 Apr
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · inferno, 16 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 20 Jul
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 11 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 18dust2Weakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA1810856%0.03
nukeB158753%0.03
cacheC125742%0.02
anubisB115645%0.03
dust2D102820%0.01
vertigoB84450%0.06
mirageC83538%0.02
ancientC73443%0.04
overpass43175%0.02
fachwerk21150%0.01
train220100%0.02
boulder110100%0.10
shelter110100%0.06
office110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,381Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 25% of Level 2 players
1,743Matches
50.1%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 2 players
52.4%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 2 players
7.8%Shot accuracy
6,184MVPs
711Hours (in match)
1,819Bombs planted
718Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,563inferno
3,464vertigo
2,076dust2
1,853nuke
743train
157cbble
73office
45italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
85.8%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
567msReaction time
51.2%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
16.15HE damage / grenade
7.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4177 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–100.0021%20 Sept
inferno13–60.0624%20 Sept
anubis10–130.0418%20 Sept
ancient15–150.0315%18 Sept
dust28–130.0126%18 Sept
nuke7–130.1032%18 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0617%16 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0044%16 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0715%12 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0116%12 Sept
dust213–100.0817%11 Sept
ancient13–10.1431%11 Sept
vertigo13–60.0515%11 Sept
inferno13–20.0921%9 Sept
boulder13–30.1024%9 Sept
nuke6–130.0017%9 Sept
inferno8–130.0415%8 Sept
anubis13–60.0716%8 Sept
nuke12–120.0220%8 Sept
cache11–13-0.0226%7 Sept
fachwerk5–13-0.0119%7 Sept
dust24–13-0.0120%7 Sept
shelter13–70.0638%7 Sept
office13–80.0225%6 Sept
inferno13–90.0218%4 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0127%4 Sept
nuke12–120.0025%30 Aug
inferno13–90.0127%30 Aug
ancient10–130.0117%28 Aug
nuke13–50.0719%28 Aug
cache6–130.0823%22 Aug
inferno12–120.0721%22 Aug
vertigo13–40.1326%22 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0125%22 Aug
mirage12–120.1017%22 Aug
inferno13–40.0517%15 Aug
overpass13–11-0.006%15 Aug
nuke13–60.0326%15 Aug
anubis13–50.1130%15 Aug
mirage7–13-0.1025%15 Aug
ancient13–60.0318%15 Aug
train13–60.0031%15 Aug
dust23–13-0.0511%13 Aug
vertigo13–5-0.0614%13 Aug
nuke10–20.0830%13 Aug
mirage12–120.0827%9 Aug
mirage7–30.0329%9 Aug
anubis7–130.0918%9 Aug
vertigo10–130.0018%9 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0516%9 Aug
nuke13–40.0726%9 Aug
inferno13–30.0913%4 Aug
cache13–110.0118%4 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0238%3 Aug
fachwerk13–50.0328%2 Aug
inferno13–80.1230%29 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0417%24 Jul
dust27–130.0133%24 Jul
dust212–16-0.0013%24 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0221%20 Jul
cache13–50.0323%20 Jul
anubis8–130.028%20 Jul
cache8–13-0.0330%20 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0521%16 Jul
dust213–70.0429%16 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0313%16 Jul
ancient13–10.0317%16 Jul
cache7–13-0.0021%16 Jul
inferno10–130.0022%16 Jul
cache15–15-0.0527%13 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0120%13 Jul
cache13–11-0.059%13 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0518%11 Jul
nuke13–20.1124%11 Jul
cache5–13-0.0025%8 Jul
cache13–30.0513%23 Jun
train13–80.0524%23 Jun
cache12–120.2223%15 Jun
nuke13–60.0715%8 Jun
inferno12–120.1328%21 May
overpass13–40.0625%7 May
anubis13–10-0.085%7 May
ancient10–130.0624%7 May
anubis13–110.0816%4 May
inferno13–10-0.0122%26 Apr
overpass13–70.0425%23 Apr
overpass0–13-0.0319%18 Apr
mirage13–60.0518%12 Apr
dust211–130.0227%12 Apr
vertigo7–9-0.054%12 Apr
anubis12–120.0924%11 Apr
nuke13–90.0529%11 Apr
dust211–130.0215%11 Apr
vertigo6–9-0.0024%10 Apr
vertigo7–130.0418%10 Apr
dust210–130.0215%7 Apr
vertigo9–00.3433%6 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0416%5 Apr
mirage13–90.1022%4 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0325%3 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →