veksu

veksu — CS2 Stats

FI76561199121713153[U:1:1161447425]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,204Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,899Hours in CS39Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,606Blue band · top ~51.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,424 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+365Premier CS Rating · 10,241 → 10,606
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 54 days played since 10 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,606 +6,061 22 May23 Sept · 12 days played
4,53810,606peak 10,60622 May23 Sept
10,677Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,424Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2026-03-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,424
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 107 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 10,606
  • +5,703 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,394 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,045), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate43.1%43.8%44.8%1.7% short
Shot accuracy8.9%12.0%12.5%3.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.931.021.030.11 short
Match win rate44.2%44.7%45.2%1.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 6 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGveksuFACEITLevel 5 · 1,424 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER10,606 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,424csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning69
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50491Last 10050%Win rateWLWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.4
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning6.9
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time574ms−114ms
first ⅓ avg 688ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 11 Jul
35%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · vertigo, 2 Jun
422msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · anubis, 13 Sept
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 18 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27151256%0.02
nukeB168850%0.00
dust2C1661038%0.01
infernoB137654%0.03
ancientA127558%0.01
anubisS75271%0.07
vertigo41325%-0.01
overpass2020%0.02
cache_b21150%0.03
poseidon1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

52,740Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
3,153Matches
44.2%Match win rate
43.1%Headshot %
8.9%Shot accuracy
7,659MVPs
1,106Hours (in match)
2,178Bombs planted
638Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,788
AWP3,605
MP91,898
MAC-101,263
Knife1,100

Lifetime map wins

4,776nuke
3,296inferno
1,986dust2
1,519vertigo
1,430train
257lake
131cbble
65office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,169Matches
48%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
81.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage40049%0.9515.4
Nuke22052%1.0016.0
Ancient17650%0.9215.3
Anubis13156%0.9515.4
Dust29440%0.8114.1
Inferno8934%0.8314.3
Overpass2030%0.8515.1
Train1573%0.9214.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
73.0%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
572msReaction time
39.2%T opening success
54.7%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
12.34HE damage / grenade
3.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.7883 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.1569% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–100.0316%23 Sept
nuke7–130.0116%22 Sept
inferno13–20.1122%22 Sept
mirage7–130.0114%21 Sept
mirage5–130.0129%21 Sept
nuke13–30.0615%21 Sept
inferno13–00.1920%18 Sept
anubis11–130.1322%18 Sept
mirage4–100.0123%18 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0217%17 Sept
ancient7–130.0711%16 Sept
mirage13–100.0223%16 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0617%15 Sept
mirage13–10.0823%15 Sept
dust26–130.0316%15 Sept
mirage13–60.0320%15 Sept
ancient2–130.0111%14 Sept
dust213–00.0421%14 Sept
mirage13–110.0323%14 Sept
dust24–130.0223%14 Sept
mirage11–130.028%13 Sept
anubis13–60.0220%13 Sept
mirage10–130.0616%11 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0310%11 Sept
mirage13–40.1126%11 Sept
inferno6–90.0133%11 Sept
anubis13–90.1013%9 Sept
inferno16–12-0.0417%25 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0113%22 Aug
dust213–10-0.026%12 Jul
nuke3–9-0.0419%11 Jul
inferno4–9-0.054%11 Jul
inferno9–20.2427%11 Jul
mirage5–110.0510%11 Jul
nuke9–70.0626%11 Jul
nuke13–20.037%11 Jul
mirage13–20.1513%11 Jul
inferno10–130.0119%28 Jun
ancient13–60.0512%26 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0325%25 Jun
dust213–50.1023%17 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0113%6 Jun
vertigo6–13-0.0135%2 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0121%2 Jun
mirage13–90.0414%1 Jun
ancient13–70.0316%30 May
inferno3–13-0.087%29 May
dust21–9-0.029%25 May
inferno14–160.0622%25 May
nuke2–20.0123%25 May
nuke6–130.0822%24 May
overpass16–190.0413%24 May
vertigo16–13-0.0221%24 May
ancient13–110.0316%23 May
mirage13–11-0.017%22 May
dust28–130.0216%20 May
nuke13–90.0118%19 May
dust213–16-0.0418%16 May
anubis13–100.1216%16 May
nuke16–14-0.0418%11 May
ancient7–5-0.0530%10 May
anubis2–50.0115%10 May
inferno16–120.0217%1 May
nuke2–13-0.0915%29 Apr
mirage13–110.0116%29 Apr
ancient13–50.047%25 Apr
dust211–13-0.0110%25 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0218%20 Apr
mirage13–110.0421%20 Apr
ancient13–100.0023%13 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0314%11 Apr
dust27–13-0.0914%11 Apr
nuke13–100.0719%10 Apr
anubis13–100.0912%7 Apr
mirage13–160.0011%6 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0418%3 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0222%3 Apr
mirage13–100.0214%29 Mar
dust213–30.0516%28 Mar
mirage18–22-0.0313%28 Mar
mirage13–100.0212%23 Mar
inferno13–80.0219%20 Mar
dust216–140.0913%19 Mar
dust213–100.0319%15 Mar
cache_b14–160.0313%14 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0230%13 Mar
cache_b13–60.0420%13 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0719%13 Mar
ancient13–90.0213%13 Mar
vertigo11–130.0021%13 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0227%13 Mar
dust210–13-0.0025%13 Mar
dust213–16-0.0420%12 Mar
poseidon5–90.0015%11 Mar
vertigo8–8-0.0121%11 Mar
overpass5–90.006%11 Mar
nuke9–40.0015%11 Mar
ancient9–130.009%11 Mar
dust29–13-0.0616%11 Mar
mirage13–110.0720%10 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →