Xaiizy

Xaiizy — CS2 Stats

NO76561199119727386[U:1:1159461658]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,745Tracked matches42%Win rate2021Tracked since
6,278Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,039 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,745 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 66 days played since 17 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,050 -1,950 19 Mar4 Jul · 12 days played
22,62225,531peak 25,53119 Mar4 Jul
Faceit ELO: 2,039 +0 1 Sept20 Sept · 4 observations
2,0392,039peak 2,0391 Sept20 Sept
25,531Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,039Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
66Days played since 2026-03-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,039
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 461 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches54+1
Win rate40%50%−10pp
K/D1.010.83+0.18
Headshot %47%58%−11pp

Measured 14 Sep 202622 Sep 2026; previous 7 Sep 2026 → 14 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,629), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate63.4%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy11.1%13.2%13.7%2.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.701.071.090.39 short
Match win rate50.9%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGXaiizyFACEITLevel 9 · 2,039 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,039csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning54
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40519Last 10040%Win rateWLLLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +7.1pp headshot accuracy · −32ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim9.4
Utility5.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning5.4
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact2.4

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time558ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy26.3%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 29.1% → last ⅓ avg 26.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 4 Apr
53%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · nuke, 22 May
359msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · inferno, 17 Aug
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 3 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
119In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 54% over 28mirageWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB28151354%0.02
nukeD1961332%0.02
infernoC146843%-0.00
anubisC135838%0.01
mirageD81713%-0.00
cacheC73443%0.00
overpassD62433%0.06
dust2C52340%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

147,107Lifetime kills
0.70K/D
4,502Matches
50.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
63.4%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 9 players
11.1%Shot accuracy
11,818MVPs
5,033Hours (in match)
3,302Bombs planted
1,260Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4779,032
AWP6,198
MP91,763
Knife1,572
MAC-101,516

Lifetime map wins

7,269inferno
5,506nuke
3,944dust2
2,068vertigo
716train
105cbble
26office
22italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

937Matches
52%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
73.7ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient20552%1.0616.1
Mirage10738%0.9415.5
Nuke10062%1.0615.5
Anubis9856%1.0615.8
Inferno8042%0.9814.8
Overpass6462%1.0015.0
Dust24042%0.8714.4
Train1867%1.0416.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.5%Headshot accuracy
42.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
51.5%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
561msReaction time
26.6%T opening success
51.7%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
6.21HE damage / grenade
8.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.5625% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass13–110.0931%11 Sept
nuke12–160.0323%5 Sept
anubis3–130.0141%3 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0535%30 Aug
ancient13–110.0227%27 Aug
anubis13–60.0228%27 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0425%22 Aug
overpass7–130.1129%22 Aug
cache11–130.0431%22 Aug
nuke11–130.0135%21 Aug
overpass12–120.0216%21 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0129%17 Aug
ancient10–130.0928%17 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0023%14 Aug
anubis16–130.0922%14 Aug
ancient13–50.1129%11 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0422%9 Aug
cache16–120.0322%5 Aug
ancient13–110.0125%1 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0016%29 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0143%26 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0022%24 Jul
dust25–130.0222%23 Jul
cache13–7-0.0120%23 Jul
mirage9–130.0228%18 Jul
inferno13–50.0329%17 Jul
inferno13–90.0528%9 Jul
mirage11–130.0935%9 Jul
overpass12–120.0219%8 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0622%6 Jul
ancient13–90.0024%5 Jul
ancient7–130.1122%5 Jul
inferno13–80.0314%4 Jul
ancient3–130.0233%2 Jul
ancient9–130.0018%1 Jul
nuke13–40.0424%30 Jun
nuke13–30.1417%25 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0413%24 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0324%24 Jun
cache13–7-0.0146%24 Jun
inferno13–16-0.0515%19 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0450%15 Jun
ancient11–130.0327%14 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0210%12 Jun
dust28–13-0.0431%5 Jun
anubis19–170.0423%3 Jun
ancient13–20.0420%3 Jun
ancient1–13-0.076%3 Jun
mirage10–130.0119%1 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0127%28 May
nuke9–130.0020%26 May
ancient13–90.0828%26 May
nuke5–130.0553%22 May
inferno13–100.0631%8 May
inferno13–60.0215%2 May
dust213–80.0525%2 May
ancient16–14-0.0122%1 May
cache12–12-0.0233%29 Apr
cache3–130.0033%29 Apr
cache9–13-0.0434%28 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0633%27 Apr
ancient13–90.0234%27 Apr
anubis13–60.0526%26 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0921%24 Apr
ancient13–110.0131%23 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0228%22 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0028%22 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0314%18 Apr
anubis12–12-0.0234%17 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0141%17 Apr
ancient13–60.0148%17 Apr
mirage13–110.0133%16 Apr
anubis13–50.0846%14 Apr
ancient13–20.0927%14 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0831%10 Apr
overpass12–120.0337%10 Apr
ancient13–60.0031%10 Apr
nuke13–80.0725%6 Apr
nuke12–12-0.0126%5 Apr
dust213–110.0432%5 Apr
nuke13–20.1416%4 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0135%4 Apr
ancient6–130.0436%3 Apr
inferno10–130.0429%3 Apr
inferno12–12-0.0913%3 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0419%1 Apr
nuke10–130.0338%31 Mar
overpass13–110.0727%31 Mar
ancient11–130.0139%28 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0227%28 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0422%26 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0230%24 Mar
dust24–13-0.0318%24 Mar
inferno16–140.0334%23 Mar
nuke13–80.0215%23 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0719%19 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0330%19 Mar
ancient9–130.0430%19 Mar
nuke10–130.0136%19 Mar
nuke13–110.0023%17 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →