ˢᵉᶻᵉᵐ

ˢᵉᶻᵉᵐ — CS2 Stats

HU76561199115105978[U:1:1154840250]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

504Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
472Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,898Top 5% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2458 of 220535 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 27,898 → 27,898
+12Tracked matches · now 504
+1.8ppWin rate · 53.3% → 55.2%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 11 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,898 -1,680 17 May1 Sept · 18 days played
26,80629,622peak 29,62217 May1 Sept
29,722Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-05-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,724 below peak (29,622)
  • -546 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,102 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2115+6
Win rate52%40%+12pp
K/D0.970.60+0.36
Headshot %52%49%+3pp

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,040), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate45.5%44.9%45.8%meets
Shot accuracy2.0%12.4%12.7%10.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.921.041.050.14 short
Match win rate49.1%45.3%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGˢᵉᶻᵉᵐFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER27,898 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim98
Positioning55
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54406Last 10054%Win rateLWLWWWTWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −15.2pp headshot accuracy · +179ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 532 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 455ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim9.8
Utility4.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 98 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.8
Positioning5.5
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time429ms−84ms
first ⅓ avg 513ms → last ⅓ avg 429ms
Headshot accuracy29.6%+11.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 29.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 7–1 · anubis, 6 Jul
91%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 5 Aug
211msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · mirage, 3 Aug
13–0Biggest win · cache, 3 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
24In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 40% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA35221363%0.01
anubisC25101540%0.01
ancientA159660%0.02
cacheA95456%0.03
dust2S86275%0.03
mirage42250%0.02
nuke1010%-0.17
boulder1010%-0.03
fachwerk1010%-0.09
office1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

18,336Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
1,231Matches
49.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
45.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
2.0%Shot accuracy
2,572MVPs
472Hours (in match)
1,001Bombs planted
225Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,006inferno
1,850nuke
1,769dust2
518office
105vertigo
100italy
78train
15cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

227Matches
50%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
73.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust26843%0.8312.2
Inferno5560%0.9115.0
Anubis4553%0.9213.9
Mirage2438%0.8913.7
Ancient1856%0.9212.6
Nuke1060%1.0413.2
Overpass743%1.0212.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.7%Headshot accuracy
45.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
5.6°Preaim
439msReaction time
45.3%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
12.27HE damage / grenade
7.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4707 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–13-0.0317%16 Sept
anubis13–40.1415%16 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0221%15 Sept
anubis11–1-0.0216%15 Sept
inferno13–40.0116%15 Sept
dust213–100.0319%14 Sept
inferno8–8-0.1323%11 Sept
inferno13–70.0430%10 Sept
inferno12–12-0.0326%9 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0429%8 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0016%7 Sept
nuke4–9-0.1714%5 Sept
dust21–13-0.0191%5 Aug
dust213–10.1427%5 Aug
mirage2–130.0976%3 Aug
cache13–00.1041%3 Aug
ancient10–130.0533%2 Aug
inferno1–130.0119%2 Aug
anubis0–13-0.1110%2 Aug
dust213–30.1437%2 Aug
inferno13–70.0744%2 Aug
inferno13–30.0949%2 Aug
inferno2–130.0162%1 Aug
inferno3–130.0419%1 Aug
inferno6–20.1939%31 Jul
anubis13–10.0525%31 Jul
cache13–00.0113%31 Jul
anubis11–130.0425%31 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0818%31 Jul
inferno0–13-0.1128%31 Jul
mirage13–40.0332%30 Jul
ancient13–50.0624%30 Jul
anubis13–0-0.0125%30 Jul
cache5–130.0248%30 Jul
ancient16–12-0.019%29 Jul
anubis11–130.0538%29 Jul
anubis13–30.0024%29 Jul
inferno13–20.0515%29 Jul
ancient13–60.1028%29 Jul
anubis5–130.0621%29 Jul
anubis7–130.0321%28 Jul
inferno13–110.0218%27 Jul
anubis10–130.0320%27 Jul
ancient13–90.1129%24 Jul
inferno13–20.1122%24 Jul
inferno13–90.0120%24 Jul
anubis13–50.0726%24 Jul
inferno13–30.0220%24 Jul
boulder12–12-0.0311%21 Jul
fachwerk1–13-0.090%21 Jul
inferno13–30.0316%20 Jul
anubis8–130.0236%19 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0111%19 Jul
mirage0–13-0.090%15 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0825%15 Jul
inferno13–50.0816%15 Jul
anubis7–130.0520%15 Jul
inferno3–13-0.028%14 Jul
anubis6–130.0114%14 Jul
dust213–00.0129%14 Jul
anubis0–13-0.123%14 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0820%14 Jul
anubis13–110.0611%13 Jul
inferno13–90.0123%13 Jul
cache13–60.0817%13 Jul
cache13–30.1615%13 Jul
inferno13–00.0431%13 Jul
ancient13–60.0719%13 Jul
ancient13–20.0216%12 Jul
cache10–130.0419%12 Jul
cache1–13-0.050%12 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0220%12 Jul
inferno13–90.0021%11 Jul
ancient13–100.0821%11 Jul
anubis13–90.0429%11 Jul
ancient13–50.0217%11 Jul
ancient5–130.0227%6 Jul
anubis7–10.2013%6 Jul
inferno13–100.2033%6 Jul
inferno6–130.0814%6 Jul
anubis13–80.0425%6 Jul
inferno15–150.0414%5 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0419%1 Jul
inferno13–4-0.066%1 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0412%1 Jul
cache13–6-0.0412%1 Jul
inferno13–90.0111%25 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0819%18 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0218%17 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0623%17 Jun
inferno7–2-0.0410%17 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0615%27 May
inferno7–13-0.0224%26 May
ancient10–13-0.0521%26 May
mirage13–40.0429%24 May
dust213–30.0515%24 May
inferno8–13-0.1112%18 May
dust213–6-0.0417%17 May
office9–13-0.0919%13 May
dust29–13-0.0916%11 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →