sasa

sasa — CS2 Stats

LV76561199112241228[U:1:1151975500]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

950Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,325Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning56
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4753Last 10047%Win rateWLWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.8pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 607ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility3.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.6
Utility3.2
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time588ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 17 Feb
45%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · inferno, 19 Oct
422msFastest reaction time · 7–16 · inferno, 11 Aug
16–1Biggest win · mirage, 10 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
31Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 59% over 17nukeWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2291341%0.03
anubisA2112957%0.03
ancientA1710759%0.00
mirageB158753%0.02
nukeD1441029%0.01
vertigoD62433%0.03
dust22020%-0.02
overpass21150%0.02
train110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

64,050Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
2,427Matches
50.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
51.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
17.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
8,847MVPs
1,325Hours (in match)
2,308Bombs planted
1,094Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,180
AWP8,801
Knife1,711
FAMAS1,394
P250796

Lifetime map wins

5,110inferno
4,492dust2
1,912nuke
1,794vertigo
1,381train
13office
2italy
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,043Matches
52%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
83.2ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis12060%1.4017.7
Ancient11349%1.1516.4
Mirage9552%1.2317.3
Inferno8859%1.3618.3
Dust24945%1.0215.2
Nuke4842%1.2217.5
Train743%1.1219.1
Vertigo650%1.1517.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
590msReaction time
34.6%T opening success
39.6%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
11.25HE damage / grenade
9.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.6477% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.0320%29 Jul
nuke6–130.0418%5 Jun
anubis13–90.0713%5 Jun
ancient13–60.1715%5 Jun
inferno16–120.0533%25 Dec
ancient13–8-0.0218%11 Sept
inferno13–100.0124%8 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0414%7 Aug
ancient2–13-0.1129%6 Aug
mirage7–130.0317%4 Aug
train13–60.0319%19 Jul
nuke13–80.1321%13 Jul
inferno4–130.0029%6 Jul
anubis14–160.0420%6 Jul
dust29–13-0.0223%6 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0422%10 Jun
anubis13–110.0113%30 Dec
anubis9–13-0.0539%28 Dec
anubis6–130.0233%27 Dec
dust26–13-0.0219%27 Dec
anubis13–100.0222%27 Dec
inferno13–70.0722%26 Dec
nuke7–130.0112%25 Dec
ancient7–13-0.0217%23 Dec
mirage12–16-0.0218%21 Dec
anubis7–130.0134%20 Dec
anubis13–90.0428%19 Dec
mirage13–80.0220%19 Dec
mirage13–20.0526%18 Dec
ancient7–13-0.0315%17 Dec
nuke13–110.0427%17 Dec
mirage13–90.0417%16 Dec
inferno13–40.0619%12 Dec
anubis3–13-0.0119%12 Dec
ancient10–13-0.0115%10 Dec
ancient16–120.0618%9 Dec
anubis13–70.0825%8 Dec
ancient13–110.0219%7 Dec
anubis13–100.1023%6 Dec
inferno19–16-0.0024%6 Dec
anubis12–160.0218%4 Dec
ancient14–16-0.0115%2 Dec
anubis13–110.1119%2 Dec
vertigo13–100.0931%2 Dec
inferno9–130.0533%30 Nov
ancient13–8-0.0325%30 Nov
anubis8–13-0.0217%24 Nov
mirage13–16-0.0517%16 Nov
ancient10–13-0.069%13 Nov
mirage13–80.0427%22 Oct
nuke13–9-0.0228%22 Oct
inferno0–13-0.0545%19 Oct
mirage13–80.0237%1 Apr
mirage11–130.0414%10 Mar
mirage13–60.0214%8 Mar
ancient13–80.0432%6 Mar
nuke10–130.0415%2 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0525%28 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0522%24 Feb
inferno9–130.0530%23 Feb
inferno11–130.0131%23 Feb
vertigo13–60.1228%23 Feb
ancient13–90.1323%23 Feb
mirage1–13-0.086%22 Feb
anubis10–13-0.1114%19 Feb
mirage7–130.0028%19 Feb
ancient5–12-0.0818%17 Feb
inferno13–60.2525%17 Feb
ancient13–90.0118%17 Feb
anubis13–60.0517%15 Feb
anubis13–110.108%15 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0311%14 Feb
anubis16–140.0813%14 Feb
inferno22–250.0022%12 Feb
anubis13–50.049%12 Feb
ancient13–7-0.0132%11 Feb
nuke13–70.0433%11 Feb
anubis13–80.0124%11 Feb
nuke9–130.0021%11 Feb
anubis13–160.0219%11 Feb
vertigo10–16-0.0721%20 Aug
inferno9–16-0.0318%12 Aug
inferno16–140.0627%12 Aug
nuke7–16-0.0118%12 Aug
inferno7–16-0.0416%11 Aug
overpass12–16-0.0612%11 Aug
vertigo11–160.0711%11 Aug
nuke11–16-0.0218%11 Aug
mirage16–100.0614%11 Aug
inferno14–160.0715%10 Aug
inferno15–190.0119%10 Aug
inferno10–16-0.0317%10 Aug
vertigo8–160.0416%10 Aug
inferno16–140.0018%10 Aug
mirage16–10.1230%10 Aug
vertigo9–16-0.0821%10 Aug
inferno13–160.0521%10 Aug
mirage9–160.0115%9 Aug
overpass16–60.0927%9 Aug
inferno16–140.0517%9 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →