denisterios

denisterios — CS2 Stats

LV76561198049385731[U:1:89120003]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

650Tracked matches76%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#44442 of 226755 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 18 Sep 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,520 +3,366 26 Mar28 Jun · 14 days played
18,11122,520peak 22,52026 Mar28 Jun
22,520Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2025-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdenisteriosFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning41
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53452Last 10053%Win rateTWWWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · −28ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 10

  • 721 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 20

  • 1541 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility4.5
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.1
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time583ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy24.5%+4.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · anubis, 30 Apr
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · inferno, 14 Jun
398msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · ancient, 8 Apr
12–0Biggest win · ancient, 14 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
93In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 88% over 8infernoWeakest map · 32% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD1961332%-0.03
dust2A1810856%-0.03
ancientB157847%-0.02
anubisA159660%-0.01
cacheS107370%0.01
mirageS87188%-0.00
nukeC73443%-0.00
office32167%0.03
overpass21150%-0.01
train21150%0.06
alpine1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

632Matches
52%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
77.9ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5357%1.0314.3
Anubis4156%1.0716.9
Mirage3148%0.8213.7
Nuke2955%1.0615.7
Dust22446%0.9113.8
Ancient2143%1.0515.5
Cache560%0.9413.0
Overpass30%0.7213.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.9%Headshot accuracy
30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
578msReaction time
25.6%T opening success
32.4%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
1.5%Flash assists
9.00HE damage / grenade
8.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.5556% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache15–150.0325%10 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0038%31 Aug
cache13–4-0.0122%31 Aug
inferno13–40.0032%31 Aug
dust25–13-0.049%9 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0424%9 Jul
mirage6–00.0733%28 Jun
anubis13–60.0321%28 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0619%18 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0418%18 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0517%17 Jun
dust213–80.0028%17 Jun
dust213–8-0.0024%16 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0614%16 Jun
dust213–11-0.0320%15 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0442%14 Jun
ancient12–00.0932%14 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0139%20 May
dust213–7-0.0337%13 May
inferno10–13-0.0224%13 May
ancient7–130.0726%9 May
cache13–9-0.0315%6 May
anubis13–7-0.0216%4 May
nuke13–20.0834%3 May
mirage16–12-0.0222%3 May
cache13–5-0.0417%3 May
nuke4–13-0.0519%2 May
cache13–50.0621%30 Apr
inferno9–130.0022%30 Apr
anubis13–80.1217%30 Apr
cache13–30.0322%30 Apr
cache13–60.0635%30 Apr
cache11–13-0.0024%29 Apr
office13–50.0318%29 Apr
cache10–130.0023%28 Apr
cache13–90.0221%28 Apr
anubis16–14-0.0123%28 Apr
anubis13–6-0.0111%28 Apr
inferno13–90.0018%27 Apr
inferno13–70.0127%27 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0318%26 Apr
train12–120.0115%24 Apr
train13–30.1224%24 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0226%23 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0516%23 Apr
dust213–10-0.0731%22 Apr
ancient13–100.0023%21 Apr
dust213–7-0.066%21 Apr
dust210–130.0116%18 Apr
dust213–30.0210%17 Apr
ancient13–4-0.0321%17 Apr
mirage13–40.0620%16 Apr
dust213–6-0.0330%16 Apr
inferno9–130.0228%15 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0137%15 Apr
dust211–130.0217%12 Apr
dust213–2-0.069%12 Apr
mirage13–110.0317%11 Apr
dust212–160.0231%10 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0535%10 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0325%8 Apr
anubis13–110.0133%7 Apr
anubis16–19-0.0515%7 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0726%4 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0320%4 Apr
alpine9–13-0.0214%29 Mar
office13–60.0724%29 Mar
dust25–13-0.0424%29 Mar
inferno5–90.0421%29 Mar
overpass5–13-0.0116%28 Mar
anubis13–100.0021%28 Mar
office10–13-0.0124%27 Mar
dust25–13-0.114%26 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0625%26 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0421%26 Mar
dust213–11-0.0017%26 Mar
anubis3–13-0.1013%26 Mar
dust28–13-0.0126%25 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0530%20 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0710%19 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0615%19 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0620%19 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0418%19 Mar
ancient3–13-0.0123%18 Mar
nuke13–10.0117%18 Mar
inferno6–13-0.064%18 Mar
dust29–13-0.0621%18 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0114%17 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0633%17 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0522%17 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0016%17 Mar
anubis4–13-0.1119%16 Mar
inferno2–13-0.1133%16 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0633%16 Mar
inferno9–13-0.1027%13 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0240%11 Mar
anubis13–90.0415%11 Mar
ancient13–11-0.049%11 Mar
inferno11–30.0618%13 Feb
nuke13–20.0417%18 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →