xen | 氙氣

xen | 氙氣 — CS2 Stats

LV76561198064558833[U:1:104293105]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

593Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#62861 of 226746 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,584 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 9 Feb 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,933 +1,228 9 Feb23 Jun · 21 days played
13,62222,737peak 22,7379 Feb23 Jun
22,737Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,584Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2024-02-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,584
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 167 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxen | 氙氣FACEITLevel 8 · 1,584 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,584csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning38
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49501Last 10049%Win rateWLLLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · +27ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 663ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 734ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 720ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility2.4
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 702ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning3.8
Utility2.4
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time699ms+116ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 699ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.33Best match rating · 9–0 · nuke, 31 Mar
36%Best headshot accuracy · 9–7 · inferno, 17 Dec
406msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · mirage, 18 Feb
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 16 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 27% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2261627%-0.01
nukeB189950%0.02
ancientB189950%-0.01
infernoB147750%-0.03
anubisA148657%-0.02
vertigoS64267%0.02
dust2S54180%-0.00
train21150%0.01
overpass110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,027Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
83.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2438%1.0615.1
Nuke1872%1.1714.9
Anubis1753%1.4817.0
Mirage1540%0.8513.5
Inferno1354%1.0912.8
Vertigo560%1.1814.8
Dust21100%0.7112.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
702msReaction time
23.7%T opening success
42.6%CT opening success
0.79Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
8.34HE damage / grenade
12.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 701.6096ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.7231% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–12-0.039%25 Dec
dust26–13-0.100%30 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0723%23 Jun
ancient1–13-0.0829%19 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0325%17 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0714%16 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0513%15 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0221%14 Jun
train13–30.0029%13 Jun
anubis13–100.0219%11 Jun
dust213–20.0122%11 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0921%10 Jun
ancient16–13-0.0510%10 Jun
nuke16–130.0623%10 Jun
anubis2–10-0.0014%10 Jun
dust213–70.028%9 Jun
ancient13–110.0314%7 Jun
mirage13–100.0116%6 Jun
nuke15–150.0011%5 Jun
ancient13–70.0315%27 May
dust213–11-0.0024%27 May
mirage4–13-0.0425%26 May
dust213–70.0425%26 May
mirage6–13-0.0420%26 May
inferno2–9-0.0814%24 Feb
inferno9–7-0.1236%17 Dec
train7–130.0315%14 Nov
inferno0–13-0.1033%19 Oct
anubis13–11-0.0316%17 Oct
anubis7–13-0.0421%9 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0115%18 Jun
inferno13–90.0615%16 Jun
vertigo13–10.0932%16 Jun
ancient13–90.0217%15 Jun
nuke0–9-0.3025%19 May
inferno9–50.0511%17 May
vertigo9–0-0.030%15 Apr
mirage0–5-0.060%31 Mar
nuke9–00.3325%31 Mar
mirage3–130.0133%16 Mar
inferno0–90.000%26 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0322%24 Feb
mirage1–130.0028%22 Feb
mirage1–9-0.137%20 Feb
vertigo11–13-0.0113%20 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0114%20 Feb
mirage13–4-0.078%20 Feb
mirage6–13-0.065%19 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0611%19 Feb
nuke13–10.1821%19 Feb
vertigo13–20.013%19 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0026%19 Feb
anubis7–12-0.1226%19 Feb
mirage10–130.0728%18 Feb
inferno13–40.0326%17 Feb
ancient5–12-0.0117%17 Feb
inferno13–6-0.0213%17 Feb
ancient13–110.1110%15 Feb
mirage13–80.0311%15 Feb
anubis13–3-0.0431%15 Feb
nuke7–13-0.027%15 Feb
ancient4–13-0.1125%15 Feb
anubis10–130.0311%15 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0824%14 Feb
mirage13–110.0118%14 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0618%14 Feb
anubis16–14-0.0019%14 Feb
ancient16–14-0.0217%13 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0223%13 Feb
ancient13–7-0.0119%13 Feb
nuke16–130.1123%13 Feb
vertigo13–30.0710%13 Feb
mirage16–140.0519%13 Feb
ancient7–13-0.044%12 Feb
anubis13–7-0.0313%12 Feb
ancient13–7-0.0526%11 Feb
nuke13–70.1111%11 Feb
anubis13–80.0119%11 Feb
nuke9–130.0123%11 Feb
nuke16–130.0214%10 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0913%10 Feb
mirage13–40.0616%10 Feb
vertigo11–13-0.0334%10 Feb
ancient8–130.0815%10 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0716%10 Feb
ancient13–100.0324%10 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0613%10 Feb
anubis13–90.0118%10 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0123%10 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0218%10 Feb
mirage9–130.0524%10 Feb
mirage8–130.0420%10 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0612%10 Feb
ancient10–130.089%9 Feb
nuke13–4-0.063%9 Feb
nuke11–130.0411%9 Feb
inferno13–70.0221%9 Feb
anubis4–130.0211%9 Feb
ancient11–130.0322%9 Feb
overpass13–80.0616%9 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →