Klem3ns

Klem3ns — CS2 Stats

BM76561199110605928[U:1:1150340200]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

720Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
873Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,706 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 720 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 2 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,887 +427 2 Apr5 Jul · 11 days played
22,55824,999peak 24,9992 Apr5 Jul
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,706Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-04-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,706
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 45 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 19 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202619 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,115), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate49.2%46.8%48.3%meets
Shot accuracy8.6%13.0%13.2%4.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.351.061.07above
Match win rate48.6%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKlem3nsFACEITLevel 8 · 1,706 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,706csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning58
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57358Last 10057%Win rateWWLLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +33ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 697ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 618ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility3.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.8
Utility3.7
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.08
first ⅓ avg 0.10 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time599ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 660ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%−4.7%
first ⅓ avg 26.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–4 · vertigo, 11 Jun
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · dust2, 22 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · inferno, 11 Jul
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 14 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA29161355%0.04
nukeA138562%0.10
cacheB105550%0.06
infernoC94544%0.04
dust2C83538%0.04
vertigoA85363%0.10
ancientS75271%0.08
overpass41325%-0.00
anubis440100%0.07
poseidon43175%0.09
boulder1010%0.12
fachwerk110100%0.06
train110100%0.04
sanctum110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,484Lifetime kills
1.35K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players
1,917Matches
48.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
49.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
8.6%Shot accuracy
7,857MVPs
873Hours (in match)
2,503Bombs planted
615Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,535nuke
2,123vertigo
1,600inferno
1,590dust2
631train
168cbble
102office
99lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

154Matches
49%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
87.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4959%1.2719.9
Dust21735%1.1317.4
Nuke1650%1.3117.6
Ancient1155%1.2814.3
Inferno1136%1.2716.8
Anubis757%1.1417.4
Overpass475%1.9320.3
Cache333%0.9514.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
71.7%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
586msReaction time
35.9%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
8.26HE damage / grenade
7.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3305 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.9415% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–30.1134%22 Aug
dust22–00.0250%22 Aug
mirage13–160.0220%15 Jul
nuke9–130.1025%13 Jul
nuke9–10.1823%13 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0214%13 Jul
cache4–13-0.0512%12 Jul
dust28–130.0525%12 Jul
nuke13–40.0115%12 Jul
inferno1–9-0.049%11 Jul
boulder10–130.1227%10 Jul
fachwerk13–100.0618%10 Jul
dust23–130.0422%8 Jul
vertigo13–3-0.0215%8 Jul
inferno7–13-0.094%5 Jul
mirage8–130.0629%5 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0322%30 Jun
anubis13–110.0114%30 Jun
mirage12–7-0.0126%30 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0634%29 Jun
mirage13–30.0616%29 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0217%29 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0423%28 Jun
dust26–13-0.0021%26 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0323%26 Jun
ancient13–60.0417%26 Jun
ancient8–130.0117%24 Jun
mirage13–50.0623%24 Jun
anubis13–70.0924%23 Jun
dust215–190.0217%22 Jun
ancient13–50.0233%21 Jun
ancient13–100.0130%20 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0222%20 Jun
vertigo8–80.1324%18 Jun
inferno9–60.1622%18 Jun
poseidon8–8-0.0122%18 Jun
vertigo13–100.0120%14 Jun
ancient13–10.2128%14 Jun
cache13–40.0721%14 Jun
mirage13–30.0428%14 Jun
train13–80.0413%12 Jun
vertigo3–4-0.0128%12 Jun
mirage0–13-0.0519%12 Jun
mirage13–90.0827%12 Jun
overpass0–13-0.0518%12 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0018%11 Jun
nuke13–100.0514%11 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0214%11 Jun
vertigo9–40.2633%11 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0735%11 Jun
nuke9–70.1423%11 Jun
inferno9–130.0323%10 Jun
mirage6–130.0537%10 Jun
anubis16–130.0822%3 Jun
mirage12–120.0927%1 Jun
cache12–110.0316%1 Jun
vertigo9–60.0533%1 Jun
overpass12–120.0630%31 May
nuke13–70.1244%31 May
mirage13–50.1337%31 May
nuke8–130.0634%30 May
mirage13–60.1132%26 May
cache12–120.0827%21 May
mirage13–90.0818%21 May
vertigo11–130.1027%19 May
cache12–12-0.0222%19 May
mirage5–13-0.0421%19 May
mirage11–13-0.0020%18 May
nuke9–130.0326%18 May
anubis13–100.1216%17 May
cache13–60.1325%17 May
mirage13–60.0413%17 May
ancient11–130.1939%17 May
nuke13–40.1536%13 May
mirage13–30.0134%13 May
mirage13–80.0729%5 May
poseidon9–70.1226%5 May
cache9–130.0821%3 May
cache4–130.0223%30 Apr
inferno9–40.0327%29 Apr
cache13–90.1029%29 Apr
cache13–100.1127%29 Apr
mirage12–120.0531%28 Apr
dust213–60.1132%26 Apr
mirage13–110.1830%26 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0023%22 Apr
nuke9–40.1943%20 Apr
inferno9–40.1622%20 Apr
mirage13–60.0347%19 Apr
nuke11–130.0522%15 Apr
dust213–80.0715%15 Apr
mirage13–20.1627%13 Apr
inferno9–20.1916%13 Apr
dust27–13-0.0116%13 Apr
vertigo9–30.2529%7 Apr
nuke9–70.2018%7 Apr
poseidon9–20.1142%7 Apr
poseidon9–10.1548%7 Apr
sanctum9–60.0712%7 Apr
ancient13–110.1016%2 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →