dexo-_-

dexo-_- — CS2 Stats

76561199107208685[U:1:1146942957]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

883Tracked matches34%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,101Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,822Purple band · top ~17.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,461 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,822 -1,043 2 Aug – 31 Oct · 2 days played
17,82218,865peak 18,8652 Aug31 Oct
18,865Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,461Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-07-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,461
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 70 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-10-16
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-10-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,043 below peak (18,865)
  • -1,043 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,178 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches223——
Win rate51%——
K/D1.71——
Headshot %69%——

Measured 16 Oct 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate54.5%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy1.6%13.2%13.7%12.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.181.071.09above
Match win rate47.4%46.9%48.4%1.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdexo-_-FACEITLevel 9 · 1,461 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER17,822 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,461csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning54
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–56–1Last 10043%Win rateWWWLWLWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · +6.9pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 39%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility4.0
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 56% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.4
Utility4.0
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time532ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy29.2%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 27.9% → last ⅓ avg 29.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 2–12 · dust2, 28 Aug →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · mirage, 21 Oct →
266msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · vertigo, 3 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 8 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 50% over 14dust2Weakest map · 33% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3416–1847%-0.01
dust2D217–1433%0.01
ancientC166–1038%0.01
infernoB147–750%0.00
cacheD62–433%-0.02
nuke—43–175%0.03
anubis—31–233%0.01
vertigo—21–150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

52,892Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
2,830Matches
47.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
54.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
1.6%Shot accuracy
9,705MVPs
1,101Hours (in match)
2,556Bombs planted
624Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,165
AWP7,916
Knife1,414
MP91,160

Lifetime map wins

4,791dust2
3,735inferno
2,639nuke
1,067vertigo
243train
105office
78lake
24cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,261Matches
50%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
80.8ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage45653%1.2017.5
Dust228746%1.1917.0
Ancient16148%1.1518.0
Inferno12052%1.1316.3
Anubis8948%1.1216.9
Nuke7851%1.1417.8
Cache3253%1.1716.7
Overpass2025%1.1017.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.5%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
86.8%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
538msReaction time
56.1%T opening success
37.6%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
5.70HE damage / grenade
7.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.6461% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.0544%10 Nov →
mirage13–20.1141%8 Nov →
nuke13–10-0.0041%2 Nov →
mirage1–13-0.0426%2 Nov →
mirage13–40.0044%31 Oct →
ancient9–130.1137%31 Oct →
dust213–70.0825%31 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0118%31 Oct →
cache13–40.0835%31 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0429%30 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0138%29 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0518%29 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0426%29 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0128%29 Oct →
dust29–130.0232%29 Oct →
mirage13–100.0127%28 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0442%28 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0619%28 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0111%28 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0528%27 Oct →
mirage0–130.0132%27 Oct →
ancient13–80.0238%27 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0816%27 Oct →
mirage13–110.0131%27 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0814%27 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0532%27 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0230%27 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0625%27 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.1217%27 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0319%26 Oct →
inferno13–100.0425%26 Oct →
inferno13–60.1048%25 Oct →
dust25–130.0126%25 Oct →
dust217–19-0.0219%25 Oct →
nuke13–90.1232%24 Oct →
mirage8–130.0133%24 Oct →
mirage13–60.0324%24 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0520%24 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0529%21 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0531%21 Oct →
cache19–16-0.0237%21 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0660%21 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0031%21 Oct →
mirage13–70.0933%21 Oct →
mirage6–130.0220%21 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0523%20 Oct →
dust223–25-0.0230%20 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0025%20 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0224%20 Oct →
dust213–50.1023%20 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0136%20 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0022%20 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0624%19 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0325%19 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0131%19 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0622%19 Oct →
mirage9–130.0021%18 Oct →
ancient13–50.0223%18 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0129%18 Oct →
ancient16–130.0818%18 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.1022%18 Oct →
ancient13–60.1014%18 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0412%18 Oct →
ancient13–80.0339%18 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0540%18 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0235%18 Oct →
mirage13–100.0128%18 Oct →
mirage22–20-0.0129%18 Oct →
dust213–110.0128%17 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0222%17 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0346%17 Oct →
nuke13–100.0241%11 Oct →
vertigo9–60.1332%10 Oct →
dust216–140.0233%7 Oct →
mirage8–130.0231%5 Oct →
vertigo1–9-0.110%3 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0215%1 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0033%27 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0332%3 Sept →
dust22–120.1617%28 Aug →
mirage13–60.0429%24 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0330%19 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0124%18 Aug →
dust216–130.0425%11 Aug →
ancient14–160.0337%8 Aug →
ancient9–130.0448%8 Aug →
inferno13–50.0438%7 Aug →
inferno13–80.0129%7 Aug →
mirage13–30.0329%6 Aug →
inferno22–18-0.0115%6 Aug →
inferno13–20.0836%5 Aug →
mirage13–30.0520%5 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0638%4 Aug →
mirage13–60.0424%2 Aug →
anubis13–110.0820%1 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.0825%30 Jul →
ancient14–160.0127%30 Jul →
dust29–130.0330%30 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0610%30 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0228%29 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.