Wodkahontas

Wodkahontas — CS2 Stats

76561199105011818[U:1:1144746090]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,036Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,722Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.1 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 3 · 535 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,036 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 69 days played since 24 Aug 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 535 +0 1 Sept16 Sept · 2 observations
535535peak 5351 Sept16 Sept
535Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
69Days played since 2025-08-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 535
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 216 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-01

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,548), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate34.1%41.9%42.7%8.6% short
Shot accuracy9.2%12.2%11.2%2.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.500.980.990.49 short
Match win rate42.3%43.3%43.9%1.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 4 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWodkahontasFACEITLevel 3 · 535 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPEAK ELO535csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim31
Positioning32
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46504Last 10046%Win rateWLWLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · −66ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim3.1
Utility5.4
Positioning3.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 648ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.1
Positioning3.2
Utility5.4
Mechanics3.1
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 3.1/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time660ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 730ms → last ⅓ avg 660ms
Headshot accuracy10.2%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 12.5% → last ⅓ avg 10.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 8–2 · ancient, 23 Aug
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · ancient, 12 Jan
484msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 13 Aug
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 30 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
910In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 5overpassWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2213959%-0.04
ancientB168850%-0.02
overpassD1431121%-0.04
nukeC114736%-0.05
anubisC104640%-0.03
mirageA53260%-0.05
fachwerkA53260%-0.06
dust2A53260%-0.04
alpine41325%-0.08
vertigo42250%-0.03
cache110100%-0.06
train1010%-0.07
stronghold1010%-0.07
office110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

38,192Lifetime kills
0.50K/D
3,529Matches
42.3%Match win rate
34.1%Headshot %
9.2%Shot accuracy
3,661MVPs
1,607Hours (in match)
3,489Bombs planted
653Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-479,307
MP92,034
MAC-102,024
MP71,752
Knife1,298
AWP1,183

Lifetime map wins

16,133inferno
3,079nuke
2,832vertigo
1,682dust2
484train
46italy
35cbble
29lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,067Matches
49%Win rate
0.59Avg K/D
60.6ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno32158%0.6910.5
Ancient20450%0.7211.2
Anubis18248%0.629.9
Nuke8749%0.6110.2
Dust25439%0.559.5
Overpass5263%0.6910.2
Mirage4531%0.7011.0
Vertigo3543%0.589.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.5%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
63.9%Counter-strafing
12.3°Preaim
648msReaction time
25.0%T opening success
24.8%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
8.43HE damage / grenade
12.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.3287° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.508% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4484 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–80.025%10 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0513%10 Sept
ancient13–30.0212%1 Sept
mirage6–13-0.1010%31 Aug
mirage13–90.006%27 Aug
ancient8–20.1015%23 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0220%20 Aug
inferno13–6-0.008%13 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0411%11 Aug
mirage11–13-0.054%31 Jul
fachwerk10–13-0.029%22 Jul
fachwerk13–11-0.0313%22 Jul
anubis14–16-0.049%21 Jul
fachwerk13–6-0.0614%21 Jul
inferno13–10-0.1013%21 Jul
fachwerk13–9-0.067%21 Jul
nuke9–5-0.065%18 Jul
fachwerk10–13-0.1313%18 Jul
ancient13–60.0319%3 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0213%3 Jul
alpine10–13-0.080%2 Jul
cache13–7-0.0613%2 Jul
vertigo11–13-0.027%30 Jun
ancient13–20.0515%30 Jun
anubis4–13-0.063%28 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0317%28 Jun
inferno13–6-0.047%4 Jun
anubis9–130.015%24 Apr
inferno12–12-0.0112%23 Apr
nuke8–130.0214%23 Apr
train5–13-0.0713%23 Apr
vertigo13–40.009%23 Apr
alpine5–13-0.096%19 Apr
alpine7–13-0.1010%19 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0416%16 Apr
stronghold9–13-0.073%29 Mar
alpine13–8-0.069%29 Mar
nuke6–9-0.1010%23 Mar
inferno5–9-0.0518%23 Mar
anubis13–6-0.0510%21 Mar
vertigo13–5-0.0710%19 Mar
overpass10–130.0122%17 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0411%16 Mar
ancient10–13-0.017%15 Mar
inferno13–2-0.034%14 Mar
overpass12–16-0.0911%17 Feb
inferno13–5-0.0014%16 Feb
overpass2–13-0.0321%16 Feb
inferno9–13-0.097%12 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0614%2 Feb
ancient12–12-0.0214%1 Feb
dust28–13-0.0213%31 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0217%31 Jan
inferno13–110.0122%31 Jan
ancient9–13-0.090%30 Jan
vertigo10–13-0.029%29 Jan
overpass9–13-0.038%29 Jan
dust216–14-0.0518%28 Jan
ancient13–11-0.048%24 Jan
anubis13–3-0.0410%24 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0238%12 Jan
inferno7–90.0214%30 Dec
overpass5–13-0.1015%30 Dec
ancient11–13-0.0712%3 Dec
overpass4–130.0015%3 Dec
nuke8–13-0.039%26 Nov
nuke9–4-0.1026%25 Nov
ancient5–13-0.0713%23 Nov
overpass11–130.016%20 Nov
overpass8–13-0.0520%20 Nov
nuke13–4-0.023%18 Nov
overpass11–13-0.0515%12 Nov
overpass13–11-0.0218%10 Nov
dust27–13-0.0617%2 Nov
inferno11–13-0.0211%31 Oct
overpass11–13-0.0212%31 Oct
inferno16–13-0.0016%30 Oct
inferno13–11-0.0616%28 Oct
office13–9-0.0110%19 Oct
inferno13–9-0.0318%18 Oct
dust213–5-0.0416%18 Oct
mirage13–9-0.0118%18 Oct
nuke8–8-0.0113%17 Oct
overpass5–13-0.117%12 Oct
nuke6–13-0.1014%11 Oct
nuke4–13-0.108%9 Oct
ancient13–5-0.0314%7 Oct
inferno12–16-0.0513%7 Oct
overpass13–4-0.0414%25 Sept
dust213–5-0.0113%25 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0410%25 Sept
overpass9–10.0117%25 Sept
inferno12–12-0.0516%24 Sept
anubis13–11-0.037%21 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0610%19 Sept
anubis9–130.017%16 Sept
inferno19–17-0.0512%9 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0313%8 Sept
inferno16–14-0.089%29 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0711%24 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →