Mr.VanKlos

Mr.VanKlos — CS2 Stats

76561199103470106[U:1:1143204378]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,314Tracked matches52%Win rate2022Tracked since
3,876Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.9 LearningPositional Player
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (32 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 782 → 782
+22Tracked matches · now 1,314
+8.4ppWin rate · 43.3% → 51.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,236 +770 11 Mar – 13 Apr · 16 days played
10,93412,421peak 12,42111 Mar13 Apr
12,556Peak Premier in tracked matches
782Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-03-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 782
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 119 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches34——
Win rate44%——
K/D0.76——
Headshot %29%——

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMr.VanKlosPEAK ELO782csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning33
Utility23

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–54–3Last 10043%Win rateTLLWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · +29ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 680ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 654ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim4.4
Utility2.3
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch2.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning3.3
Utility2.3
Mechanics2.4
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact5.6

Composite 2.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time630ms−0ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy13.8%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 11.7% → last ⅓ avg 13.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 13 Aug →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 12–6 · mirage, 15 Aug →
422msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · train, 30 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
12–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2912–1741%-0.01
dust2B209–1145%-0.01
infernoB126–650%-0.04
ancientD93–633%-0.04
nukeS86–275%-0.05
anubisD71–614%-0.02
cache—43–175%-0.04
train—42–250%-0.06
overpass—31–233%-0.04
office—20–20%-0.01
fachwerk—10–10%-0.01
alpine—10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

54,842Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
3,994Matches
43.5%Match win rate
38.3%Headshot %
9.4%Shot accuracy
5,681MVPs
1,433Hours (in match)
3,008Bombs planted
742Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-478,325
MP73,799
AWP2,774
FAMAS2,158
MP91,958
P901,777

Lifetime map wins

6,947inferno
4,410nuke
2,555dust2
2,419vertigo
489train
129office
96lake
34italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

174Matches
51%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
81.2ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6255%0.9914.4
Inferno2556%1.0214.3
Vertigo2250%0.709.4
Ancient2143%0.7011.3
Dust21771%1.1515.4
Anubis1323%0.7713.8
Nuke850%1.0814.9
Overpass617%0.8716.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.2%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.6%Spray accuracy
60.7%Counter-strafing
12.2°Preaim
627msReaction time
27.2%T opening success
31.0%CT opening success
0.20Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
10.59HE damage / grenade
1.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.1523° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.2368% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno12–12-0.0135%27 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0511%27 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.059%27 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0715%26 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.020%26 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.073%26 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0813%15 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0010%14 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.128%14 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.067%13 Sept →
inferno13–30.037%13 Sept →
mirage13–100.028%13 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0813%12 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0210%7 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0110%7 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0110%7 Sept →
dust211–130.0213%7 Sept →
dust29–130.0616%6 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.029%6 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.1011%6 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0424%3 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0411%2 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0115%31 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.0923%31 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0221%30 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0413%30 Aug →
train0–13-0.0917%30 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0624%28 Aug →
train13–9-0.0312%26 Aug →
dust213–60.0020%26 Aug →
dust211–130.0014%25 Aug →
mirage3–130.0728%25 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0015%24 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0120%23 Aug →
fachwerk1–8-0.017%22 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0614%22 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0512%22 Aug →
train11–13-0.027%20 Aug →
mirage12–6-0.0736%15 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0613%15 Aug →
train13–7-0.096%14 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0113%13 Aug →
dust213–60.079%13 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0021%11 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.056%10 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.034%10 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0621%9 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0511%8 Aug →
dust28–6-0.0116%8 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0219%7 Aug →
mirage20–22-0.0115%7 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0128%3 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0120%2 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0629%2 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0110%2 Aug →
dust213–90.0019%2 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.083%22 Jul →
anubis3–130.0215%22 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0122%21 Jul →
mirage13–110.0018%20 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0310%23 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0914%13 Apr →
overpass13–9-0.058%13 Apr →
inferno13–70.0118%10 Apr →
anubis1–13-0.0212%9 Apr →
mirage13–110.0713%2 Apr →
dust26–13-0.0525%2 Apr →
overpass9–13-0.048%2 Apr →
overpass14–16-0.0315%1 Apr →
mirage13–70.0612%1 Apr →
mirage13–50.0214%1 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0516%1 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0716%29 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0214%29 Mar →
mirage13–100.0517%26 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0110%25 Mar →
anubis15–15-0.0213%25 Mar →
nuke16–13-0.0214%25 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0210%25 Mar →
dust213–7-0.0112%25 Mar →
mirage5–30.010%24 Mar →
dust213–9-0.0313%24 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0716%23 Mar →
mirage13–4-0.0215%23 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.0610%23 Mar →
anubis13–16-0.038%20 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.049%19 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0214%19 Mar →
nuke4–13-0.078%18 Mar →
dust213–80.028%18 Mar →
office6–13-0.049%18 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.048%16 Mar →
office2–130.028%16 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0412%15 Mar →
alpine3–130.0219%13 Mar →
nuke13–70.036%12 Mar →
inferno13–10-0.009%12 Mar →
mirage15–15-0.0311%12 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0215%11 Mar →
mirage4–130.0120%11 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.