weiraw3

weiraw3 — CS2 Stats

76561199096486234[U:1:1136220506]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

468Tracked matches71%Win rate2024Tracked since
391Hours in CS32Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,104Top 50% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#79185 of 252187 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,104 -2 18 Sept – 14 Oct · 4 days played
20,00020,106peak 20,10618 Sept14 Oct
20,106Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-08-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 2 below peak (20,106)
  • -2 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,896 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-23
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=38,294), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate35.5%46.9%49.3%13.7% short
Shot accuracy0.3%13.0%13.4%13.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.081.120.05 short
Match win rate51.3%46.7%48.5%above

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGweiraw3PREMIER20,104 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning59
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–36–6Last 10058%Win rateLWWWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +12.3pp headshot accuracy · −92ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Last 20

  • 13–5–2 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.4
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 35% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.9
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time569ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 5 Oct →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 4–2 · nuke, 16 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · dust2, 16 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 14 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 86% over 7anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3922–1756%0.00
mirageA169–756%-0.01
anubisD93–633%0.00
ancientA95–456%0.00
cacheA95–456%0.01
infernoS76–186%0.01
nukeA53–260%-0.02
train—32–167%-0.02
boulder—11–0100%0.02
office—11–0100%0.04
vertigo—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

10,414Lifetime kills
1.07K/D
678Matches
51.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Pink band
35.5%Headshot %
0.3%Shot accuracy
1,239MVPs
226Hours (in match)
391Bombs planted
149Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,966dust2
841inferno
652nuke
230train
91vertigo
46office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
74.3%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
577msReaction time
64.0%T opening success
35.0%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
9.43HE damage / grenade
12.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.0434% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0732%16 Oct →
dust213–30.0338%16 Oct →
mirage13–110.0413%16 Oct →
nuke4–2-0.0960%16 Oct →
anubis13–80.0824%16 Oct →
mirage9–130.0229%16 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0426%16 Oct →
dust213–60.0414%15 Oct →
mirage13–40.0630%14 Oct →
dust213–110.079%14 Oct →
dust213–20.0521%14 Oct →
ancient13–50.0122%14 Oct →
inferno13–30.034%14 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0317%14 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0114%14 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0318%13 Oct →
train13–8-0.0816%13 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0113%13 Oct →
train12–120.0214%11 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0414%11 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0014%11 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0526%10 Oct →
dust26–40.044%10 Oct →
inferno9–00.038%10 Oct →
nuke13–20.0119%10 Oct →
cache13–6-0.027%10 Oct →
anubis11–130.0525%10 Oct →
dust213–50.0012%9 Oct →
dust213–50.0913%9 Oct →
dust29–130.0414%9 Oct →
cache13–80.045%8 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0413%8 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0213%7 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0713%7 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.1414%6 Oct →
dust213–90.0319%6 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0419%6 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.048%6 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0032%6 Oct →
dust26–13-0.078%6 Oct →
cache13–50.1014%5 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0212%5 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0314%5 Oct →
boulder13–50.0218%5 Oct →
office13–30.0415%5 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0114%5 Oct →
dust27–130.0318%1 Oct →
vertigo13–70.0112%25 Sept →
ancient12–120.0120%25 Sept →
dust213–10-0.014%25 Sept →
cache12–120.0519%25 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0114%25 Sept →
dust211–130.0215%25 Sept →
cache13–9-0.017%25 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0013%24 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.016%19 Sept →
dust23–13-0.027%19 Sept →
train13–80.0218%19 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0015%19 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0517%19 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0023%19 Sept →
inferno13–40.0415%18 Sept →
mirage13–60.0126%18 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0113%18 Sept →
dust213–70.0113%18 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0115%18 Sept →
inferno2–30.040%18 Sept →
mirage13–110.0112%12 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0220%1 Sept →
anubis13–70.0019%31 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0613%31 Aug →
dust29–130.0216%31 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0214%31 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0219%30 Aug →
ancient16–12-0.008%30 Aug →
dust213–50.0428%30 Aug →
mirage13–110.0111%29 Aug →
dust213–40.0418%26 Aug →
cache13–80.048%25 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.019%25 Aug →
ancient13–30.0210%25 Aug →
dust213–90.0017%25 Aug →
dust213–30.0017%24 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.034%24 Aug →
anubis9–130.017%24 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.028%24 Aug →
dust29–130.029%24 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.019%24 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0615%22 Aug →
dust213–100.0314%22 Aug →
dust26–130.0311%22 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0325%22 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0318%21 Aug →
mirage13–110.0016%21 Aug →
ancient13–60.0714%21 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0619%21 Aug →
cache12–120.0113%21 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0012%20 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0415%20 Aug →
nuke13–60.0122%20 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.