stomp1e™ — CS2 Stats

76561199092288251[U:1:1132022523]✓ No bans

3,159Tracked matches66%Win rate2021Tracked since

5,624Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating17,750Purple band · top ~17.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10594 of 19383 tracked

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Pink band median	vs Pink band
Headshot rate	47.8%	48.1%	meets
Shot accuracy	11.7%	12.9%	1.1% short
Kill/death ratio	1.13	1.08	above
Match win rate	48.5%	46.5%	above

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning43

Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46–51–3Last 10046%Win rateWWWWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim8.2

Aggression4.5

Utility7.0

Positioning4.3

Opening Duels1.2

Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.80 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning4.3

Utility7.0

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time552ms−37ms

first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms

Headshot accuracy20.8%−0.1%

first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — ancient 13–2

13–1Biggest win — cache

9Longest win streak

W9Current streak

6–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 86% over 7infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	35	15–20	43%	-0.01
dust2	C	29	11–18	38%	0.00
anubis	B	13	7–6	54%	-0.01
ancient	S	7	6–1	86%	0.05
cache	S	6	4–2	67%	-0.03
inferno	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.03
nuke	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.02
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

109,635Lifetime kills

1.13K/D · Top 50% of tracked players

5,046Matches

48.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players

47.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players

11.7%Shot accuracy

10,327MVPs

8,766Hours (in match)

3,300Bombs planted

1,605Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4739,243

AWP19,238

Desert Eagle14,391

M4A4 / M4A1-S13,411

P2000 / USP-S5,164

Glock-183,510

Galil AR2,700

MP92,404

SSG 082,180

FAMAS1,584

Lifetime map wins

12,621dust2

6,043inferno

4,802vertigo

2,119nuke

602train

118office

93italy

72lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

12Matches

17%Win rate

0.83Avg K/D

73.2ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

17%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	4	25%	0.75	12.8
Mirage	3	33%	1.19	21.0
Inferno	1	0%	0.46	6.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy

37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.0%Spray accuracy

79.2%Counter-strafing

8.4°Preaim

552msReaction time

23.1%T opening success

46.2%CT opening success

0.80Enemies flashed / flash

7.8%Flash assists

9.01HE damage / grenade

14.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.1497% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–7	0.06	38%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.01	20%	27 Aug →
cache	13–1	-0.04	24%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.05	27%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.04	19%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.05	14%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.06	20%	26 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.02	24%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–1	0.03	33%	23 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.10	35%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	17%	23 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.10	8%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.07	17%	23 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.02	21%	18 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	24%	18 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	6%	17 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	24%	16 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	28%	14 Aug →
anubis	2–7	-0.12	31%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.00	12%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	16%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–2	-0.02	7%	14 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.05	30%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.04	14%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.00	14%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	11%	13 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.05	28%	13 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.04	17%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.07	10%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	29%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–5	-0.00	23%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	26%	11 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.00	19%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	11%	11 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	31%	9 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.01	27%	9 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	21%	9 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.10	16%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	26%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.01	18%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	12%	4 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.07	9%	4 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.02	31%	4 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	20%	2 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	23%	2 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.01	43%	2 Aug →
dust2	3–10	-0.07	33%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.23	23%	2 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.04	11%	2 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	21%	1 Aug →
train	13–3	0.03	19%	1 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	10%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.01	19%	30 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	21%	30 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.08	26%	30 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.08	26%	30 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	17%	30 Jul →
nuke	12–16	-0.07	25%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.07	21%	26 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.00	16%	15 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.02	8%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.01	12%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.04	5%	14 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.03	28%	13 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	21%	13 Jul →
anubis	14–16	-0.05	14%	12 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.09	12%	12 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.00	14%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	36%	12 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	17%	8 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	15%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.09	18%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	19%	5 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	42%	5 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	29%	5 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	32%	5 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	33%	5 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.08	26%	5 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	25%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.06	11%	5 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	9%	4 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.00	10%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.09	32%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.04	33%	29 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.09	9%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.04	20%	25 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	23%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	22%	20 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.00	12%	20 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.00	30%	16 Jun →
ancient	13–4	0.04	16%	15 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	19%	15 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	18%	9 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	16%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.02	21%	2 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	6%	30 May →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	35%	26 May →
cache	13–4	-0.00	5%	6 May →
cache	13–6	-0.05	26%	6 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	11%	6 May →