lexoseb [fr]

lexoseb [fr] — CS2 Stats

FR76561199087779352[U:1:1127513624]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,248Tracked matches46%Win rate2024Tracked since
4,148Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.9 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate35.0%41.8%42.7%7.7% short
Shot accuracy4.2%12.2%11.2%7.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.620.980.990.38 short
Match win rate42.5%43.3%43.9%1.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 4 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlexoseb [fr]FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim21
Positioning30
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–54–5Last 10041%Win rateLWLWLLLTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 684ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 695ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim2.1
Utility4.9
Positioning3.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 62% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 734ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.1
Positioning3.0
Utility4.9
Mechanics3.3
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact3.8

Composite 2.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.06−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.06
Reaction time720ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 777ms → last ⅓ avg 720ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 13.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–2 · office, 1 May →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · inferno, 8 May →
414msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 29 Mar →
13–0Biggest win · office, 5 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6infernoWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2410–1442%-0.06
dust2D226–1627%-0.06
infernoD123–925%-0.06
nukeB115–645%-0.07
officeB105–550%-0.04
vertigoS64–267%-0.01
anubisS65–183%-0.04
ancient—41–325%-0.07
cache—31–233%-0.02
train—21–150%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

69,328Lifetime kills
0.62K/D
10,253Matches
42.5%Match win rate
35.0%Headshot %
4.2%Shot accuracy
5,107MVPs
2,834Hours (in match)
3,283Bombs planted
857Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,529
AUG6,081
SG 5534,997
FAMAS4,711
P902,329
MP71,630
MP91,625
XM10141,593

Lifetime map wins

8,584dust2
8,319nuke
7,202inferno
4,686vertigo
1,959train
1,523office
1,323cbble
1,077italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

16Matches
6%Win rate
0.42Avg K/D
50.4ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage714%0.467.3
Dust250%0.406.6
Anubis20%0.345.5
Inferno10%0.377.0
Nuke10%0.356.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
26.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.7%Spray accuracy
64.9%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
734msReaction time
36.1%T opening success
28.8%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
7.96HE damage / grenade
5.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 734.3103ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.1206% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient2–13-0.1033%11 Nov →
nuke13–6-0.0416%30 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0818%30 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0622%30 Oct →
office9–13-0.0217%30 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0511%30 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.1125%22 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.0512%20 Oct →
mirage4–00.0120%20 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0425%20 Oct →
vertigo13–40.0327%18 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0611%18 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0732%18 Oct →
dust29–13-0.049%10 Oct →
vertigo12–12-0.0714%25 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0212%24 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.1027%24 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0737%12 Aug →
mirage10–0-0.0714%12 Aug →
office13–9-0.0214%12 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0924%25 Jul →
dust25–13-0.1011%25 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0820%19 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0413%19 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.1117%14 Jul →
anubis8–3-0.0912%14 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.089%14 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0517%14 Jul →
anubis14–16-0.046%14 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.0218%14 Jul →
cache8–13-0.008%14 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.1015%14 Jul →
dust21–13-0.110%14 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0813%14 Jul →
anubis13–2-0.0132%14 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0723%14 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.014%14 Jul →
mirage12–2-0.0620%13 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0712%13 Jul →
dust212–12-0.0621%11 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0812%11 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.1127%13 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0614%6 Jun →
vertigo13–20.0828%6 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0517%31 May →
dust213–5-0.120%31 May →
dust29–13-0.0710%16 May →
dust213–8-0.0227%14 May →
inferno12–12-0.0812%9 May →
mirage2–13-0.0933%8 May →
inferno4–13-0.0538%8 May →
dust29–13-0.0416%8 May →
cache9–13-0.0118%8 May →
mirage5–13-0.0118%7 May →
dust213–11-0.0815%3 May →
office13–20.087%1 May →
office5–13-0.1021%25 Apr →
office13–11-0.105%24 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.039%21 Apr →
nuke3–13-0.1212%20 Apr →
office7–13-0.0314%20 Apr →
anubis13–9-0.0619%19 Apr →
mirage1–13-0.068%19 Apr →
dust210–13-0.119%18 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.083%18 Apr →
dust27–13-0.1119%18 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0211%18 Apr →
office12–12-0.104%12 Apr →
office8–13-0.0518%12 Apr →
vertigo13–70.0514%12 Apr →
mirage13–100.0010%11 Apr →
mirage13–8-0.079%11 Apr →
nuke13–8-0.0610%8 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0611%8 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0416%6 Apr →
dust213–60.0622%6 Apr →
inferno2–13-0.110%5 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0919%5 Apr →
office13–0-0.0225%5 Apr →
vertigo5–13-0.0712%5 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0716%5 Apr →
mirage13–3-0.0814%5 Apr →
office13–10-0.036%5 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0111%4 Apr →
anubis13–5-0.0111%4 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0720%4 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0720%30 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.040%30 Mar →
vertigo13–7-0.0723%30 Mar →
mirage3–13-0.109%30 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0737%30 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0613%29 Mar →
nuke6–0-0.060%29 Mar →
train13–7-0.0712%29 Mar →
inferno13–7-0.1010%29 Mar →
train4–13-0.062%28 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0515%28 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0210%28 Mar →
anubis13–40.0110%28 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.0427%28 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.