чspєtu (R+)

чspєtu (R+) — CS2 Stats

FI76561199083029433[U:1:1122763705]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

875Tracked matches66%Win rate2025Tracked since
456Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.5 LearningClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating3,310Grey band · top ~86% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 875 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 17 days played since 15 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 3,310 -95 15 Jul5 Sept · 12 days played
2,1173,405peak 3,40515 Jul5 Sept
3,513Peak Premier in tracked matches
17Days played since 2026-07-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 95 below peak (3,405)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 1,690 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,544), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate37.1%41.3%41.9%4.7% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.7%12.2%12.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.780.950.980.20 short
Match win rate45.1%42.5%43.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGчspєtu (R+)FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER3,310 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim28
Positioning50
Utility15

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53416Last 10053%Win rateWWWLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 756ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 732ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 740ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim2.8
Utility1.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch5.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 751ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.8
Positioning5.0
Utility1.5
Mechanics3.4
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.07+0.08
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.07
Reaction time731ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 733ms → last ⅓ avg 731ms
Headshot accuracy13.5%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 10.5% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.38Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 2 Aug
27%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · anubis, 4 Aug
500msFastest reaction time · 0–9 · inferno, 23 Jul
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 4 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB52272552%0.05
ancientB126650%0.02
anubisB105550%0.02
dust2C83538%0.01
mirageS65183%0.02
cacheA53260%0.05
nukeC52340%0.02
office110100%0.16
vertigo110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

14,920Lifetime kills
0.78K/D
1,336Matches
45.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 2 players
37.1%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,596MVPs
456Hours (in match)
1,291Bombs planted
406Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,894inferno
2,431dust2
1,605nuke
568vertigo
56italy
56train
39office
12lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

44Matches
45%Win rate
0.54Avg K/D
46.9ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

49%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1242%0.518.3
Ancient933%0.6310.7
Nuke580%0.578.4
Overpass475%0.497.3
Dust2450%0.606.0
Inferno367%0.528.0
Mirage333%0.598.7
Cache30%0.387.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.8%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.9%Spray accuracy
65.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
751msReaction time
32.5%T opening success
52.9%CT opening success
0.20Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
4.50HE damage / grenade
1.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.8197% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 750.6494ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2013 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–90.0719%7 Aug
dust213–100.0113%7 Aug
nuke13–70.0314%7 Aug
dust210–13-0.0112%7 Aug
office13–40.1617%7 Aug
ancient8–20.2013%7 Aug
dust27–13-0.070%6 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1613%5 Aug
nuke13–70.0613%4 Aug
inferno9–50.0721%4 Aug
dust213–110.0514%4 Aug
inferno9–60.0414%4 Aug
inferno9–20.314%4 Aug
inferno9–60.1718%4 Aug
anubis6–130.1316%4 Aug
vertigo13–90.0117%4 Aug
anubis13–00.0427%4 Aug
mirage13–60.0422%4 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0710%4 Aug
inferno7–90.067%4 Aug
inferno8–80.0517%4 Aug
inferno8–80.1116%4 Aug
inferno9–50.1313%4 Aug
anubis7–130.059%3 Aug
inferno9–70.2310%3 Aug
dust23–13-0.093%3 Aug
cache13–10.169%3 Aug
mirage13–10.0720%3 Aug
anubis13–40.0723%3 Aug
ancient13–00.068%3 Aug
dust213–30.1721%3 Aug
inferno7–90.071%3 Aug
inferno9–50.1911%3 Aug
inferno5–9-0.1111%3 Aug
inferno9–70.189%3 Aug
inferno9–30.3316%3 Aug
ancient6–130.017%3 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0116%3 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0421%3 Aug
nuke15–150.0813%3 Aug
inferno9–10.1711%3 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0013%3 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0118%2 Aug
mirage7–13-0.049%2 Aug
ancient7–13-0.082%2 Aug
inferno8–80.0821%2 Aug
inferno9–40.1920%2 Aug
inferno13–50.0225%2 Aug
inferno9–10.3823%2 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0717%31 Jul
inferno13–70.0317%31 Jul
ancient13–80.0814%31 Jul
nuke14–16-0.019%31 Jul
inferno13–10.0315%31 Jul
ancient5–130.038%31 Jul
inferno9–7-0.0224%31 Jul
dust29–13-0.0114%27 Jul
anubis13–40.0419%27 Jul
mirage13–110.0325%26 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0412%26 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0212%26 Jul
cache7–130.1019%26 Jul
ancient13–30.078%26 Jul
inferno7–90.0310%26 Jul
nuke6–13-0.055%26 Jul
inferno13–100.019%26 Jul
inferno0–9-0.165%23 Jul
mirage13–40.0616%21 Jul
ancient6–13-0.066%20 Jul
anubis13–11-0.089%20 Jul
anubis13–60.0510%20 Jul
inferno13–20.0110%20 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0211%20 Jul
inferno1–7-0.1525%20 Jul
dust212–12-0.0112%20 Jul
inferno4–9-0.077%20 Jul
inferno9–60.1715%20 Jul
inferno9–60.034%20 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0120%19 Jul
ancient5–13-0.069%19 Jul
inferno9–40.0722%18 Jul
inferno7–9-0.066%18 Jul
inferno9–6-0.084%18 Jul
inferno10–130.0112%17 Jul
inferno13–16-0.052%17 Jul
inferno3–90.047%17 Jul
inferno0–9-0.216%17 Jul
inferno3–9-0.240%16 Jul
inferno7–9-0.019%16 Jul
inferno3–9-0.0314%16 Jul
inferno9–50.2111%16 Jul
inferno9–10.2914%16 Jul
inferno9–40.2610%16 Jul
inferno8–80.0617%16 Jul
inferno9–30.1113%16 Jul
cache7–13-0.0616%15 Jul
cache13–10-0.0313%15 Jul
ancient4–13-0.067%15 Jul
inferno5–9-0.240%15 Jul
ancient13–50.0011%15 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →