Kraken

Kraken — CS2 Stats

US76561199081528893[U:1:1121263165]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,300Tracked matches73%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,325Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (45 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,736 → 1,736
+12Tracked matches · now 1,300
0.0ppWin rate · 73.3% → 73.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,575 +3,906 18 Apr – 14 May · 9 days played
20,55124,575peak 24,57518 Apr14 May
24,575Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,736Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-03-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,736
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 15 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKrakenPEAK ELO1,736csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning49
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT61–38–1Last 10061%Win rateWWWLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −49ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 469ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.8
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.9
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time532ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 10 Apr →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · dust2, 18 May →
367msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · anubis, 18 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 19 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
15–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 56% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2214–864%0.01
ancientA2012–860%0.02
dust2A1911–858%-0.01
anubisS96–367%-0.00
nukeA95–456%0.02
infernoS86–275%0.00
overpassA74–357%-0.02
cache—43–175%0.00
train—10–10%-0.05
vertigo—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (56% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

59,436Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
3,928Matches
51.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
40.1%Headshot %
17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
6,530MVPs
1,484Hours (in match)
2,325Bombs planted
1,363Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

10,122dust2
2,933inferno
2,488nuke
1,040vertigo
1,034train
138cbble
57office
43lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

436Matches
52%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
71.1ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11944%0.9513.5
Ancient7853%0.9213.2
Dust27050%0.9413.3
Anubis6256%0.8813.2
Nuke3757%0.9813.4
Train2475%1.0413.2
Overpass1553%0.8813.2
Inferno1346%1.1817.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.4%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
531msReaction time
34.8%T opening success
33.2%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
10.11HE damage / grenade
9.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.7888% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–40.0712%24 Sept →
cache13–80.0020%18 Sept →
anubis13–80.0119%18 Sept →
dust210–130.0618%18 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0313%11 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0211%11 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.019%11 Sept →
ancient13–110.0115%11 Sept →
mirage19–160.0116%6 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0127%6 Sept →
dust28–130.0125%3 Sept →
nuke9–130.0121%2 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0611%5 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0329%5 Aug →
mirage13–80.068%13 Jul →
ancient13–30.0916%13 Jul →
mirage16–14-0.0110%13 Jul →
mirage13–30.0118%8 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0411%22 May →
dust213–10-0.0711%22 May →
anubis16–14-0.0213%21 May →
dust213–80.0410%20 May →
train8–13-0.0516%19 May →
inferno2–9-0.1217%19 May →
cache13–20.0629%19 May →
dust213–8-0.0740%18 May →
cache6–13-0.0336%18 May →
ancient13–10-0.049%14 May →
dust213–50.0422%14 May →
inferno7–10.0219%14 May →
ancient13–30.0216%14 May →
ancient8–130.0119%10 May →
inferno13–80.0021%5 May →
mirage10–13-0.0514%2 May →
ancient13–60.0417%2 May →
overpass9–13-0.039%29 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.068%29 Apr →
cache13–11-0.0310%29 Apr →
dust213–7-0.0013%29 Apr →
overpass16–13-0.0216%28 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0615%27 Apr →
overpass13–110.0216%27 Apr →
ancient13–9-0.028%27 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0118%27 Apr →
anubis13–8-0.0110%27 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0214%27 Apr →
dust213–100.0520%25 Apr →
mirage13–110.0718%25 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.0510%25 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0115%25 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0224%24 Apr →
overpass11–13-0.028%24 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0214%23 Apr →
overpass13–10-0.059%23 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.0116%21 Apr →
mirage13–20.0517%21 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0511%21 Apr →
dust213–40.0227%21 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0120%20 Apr →
nuke13–16-0.056%19 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.059%18 Apr →
anubis19–17-0.0014%15 Apr →
inferno13–110.0714%14 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0714%14 Apr →
inferno12–50.0313%14 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0015%14 Apr →
mirage13–110.0021%13 Apr →
nuke9–10.208%10 Apr →
nuke13–100.0222%10 Apr →
ancient13–50.0720%10 Apr →
overpass5–130.0231%10 Apr →
mirage9–130.1115%9 Apr →
nuke16–130.0815%2 Apr →
mirage5–130.0618%1 Apr →
dust213–6-0.0315%31 Mar →
mirage13–50.0815%31 Mar →
ancient13–9-0.0019%26 Mar →
overpass13–10-0.0311%25 Mar →
mirage16–140.0413%21 Mar →
ancient13–30.0713%21 Mar →
mirage13–110.0032%21 Mar →
dust213–50.0431%21 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0635%21 Mar →
mirage9–130.0323%20 Mar →
ancient11–130.0510%20 Mar →
vertigo3–13-0.0114%20 Mar →
ancient13–100.0916%20 Mar →
dust210–130.0720%19 Mar →
mirage16–140.0415%19 Mar →
mirage13–50.0520%19 Mar →
inferno13–40.0121%16 Mar →
mirage13–16-0.035%16 Mar →
ancient13–70.1014%16 Mar →
inferno12–120.0511%16 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0210%16 Mar →
dust27–13-0.076%13 Mar →
nuke7–13-0.0421%7 Mar →
ancient11–130.0421%7 Mar →
nuke16–140.0417%6 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.0414%4 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.