lonelyyBOOM

lonelyyBOOM — CS2 Stats

76561199080652252[U:1:1120386524]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

579Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
892Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,672Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#53103 of 221378 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 68 days played since 13 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,672 +1,129 13 Apr17 Sept · 41 days played
20,54323,528peak 23,52813 Apr17 Sept
23,635Peak Premier in tracked matches
68Days played since 2026-04-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,856 below peak (23,528)
  • -1,684 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,078 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,328 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches20
Win rate0%
K/D0.64
Headshot %40%

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=35,202), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate51.6%47.0%49.2%above
Shot accuracy4.5%13.0%13.4%8.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.081.120.21 short
Match win rate48.9%46.7%48.5%meets

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlonelyyBOOMPREMIER21,672 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning36
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54415Last 10054%Win rateLLLLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 664ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility3.4
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning3.6
Utility3.4
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time632ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 24.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 28 Apr
100%Best headshot accuracy · 3–10 · nuke, 24 May
391msFastest reaction time · 0–7 · mirage, 2 Jul
13–3Biggest win · cache, 17 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L5Current streak
61In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 16anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2213959%-0.03
cacheB21111052%-0.01
ancientA1610663%-0.02
nukeA169756%-0.01
anubisC114736%-0.03
dust2A53260%-0.03
inferno31233%-0.07
shelter110100%-0.07
alpine110100%0.08
vertigo1010%-0.04
poseidon110100%0.02
overpass1010%-0.09
italy1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

20,679Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
1,210Matches
48.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Pink band
51.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Pink band
4.5%Shot accuracy
2,678MVPs
531Hours (in match)
948Bombs planted
592Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,448nuke
1,178vertigo
1,031inferno
891dust2
441train
306office
119italy
27cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

135Matches
56%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
64.6ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3768%0.8813.1
Vertigo2471%0.9514.3
Anubis1644%0.8112.5
Nuke1346%0.9514.8
Dust21323%0.6710.1
Inferno1155%0.7312.2
Ancient956%0.9615.3
Train540%0.8214.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
633msReaction time
17.5%T opening success
22.8%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
2.4%Flash assists
7.93HE damage / grenade
5.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4961 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.5129% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis3–130.0221%16 Sept
inferno6–9-0.1416%13 Sept
inferno3–9-0.0356%13 Sept
dust29–13-0.059%10 Sept
cache6–13-0.0332%1 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0316%27 Aug
ancient13–50.0436%26 Aug
ancient10–130.0118%24 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0256%24 Aug
cache13–7-0.0427%23 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0543%23 Aug
dust213–100.0128%23 Aug
mirage7–130.0118%19 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0121%18 Aug
cache13–30.0332%17 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0116%16 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0032%16 Aug
cache11–13-0.0230%16 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0124%11 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0732%10 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0732%8 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0520%8 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0222%30 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0814%27 Jul
dust27–13-0.1333%19 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0218%18 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0311%17 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0318%17 Jul
nuke0–13-0.0520%17 Jul
nuke13–110.0321%15 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0525%15 Jul
mirage0–13-0.140%15 Jul
mirage13–90.0429%15 Jul
cache16–13-0.0319%14 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0414%13 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0411%12 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0440%9 Jul
cache13–6-0.0420%9 Jul
shelter13–8-0.0721%9 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0026%7 Jul
mirage13–60.0140%5 Jul
ancient13–70.0013%5 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0025%3 Jul
mirage0–7-0.100%2 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0430%2 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0221%2 Jul
cache13–90.0333%1 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0318%25 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0523%25 Jun
alpine13–40.0815%18 Jun
cache13–110.0923%13 Jun
cache13–70.0035%11 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0020%9 Jun
ancient16–13-0.1020%8 Jun
nuke13–100.0020%6 Jun
anubis3–12-0.084%4 Jun
dust213–80.0020%4 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0029%3 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0423%3 Jun
mirage13–70.0226%2 Jun
cache9–13-0.0625%1 Jun
cache13–8-0.0128%31 May
vertigo8–8-0.0419%31 May
poseidon9–60.0226%31 May
overpass8–13-0.0912%31 May
cache6–13-0.0721%30 May
mirage1–13-0.120%30 May
inferno13–6-0.0315%28 May
nuke13–9-0.0419%27 May
nuke3–100.04100%24 May
mirage13–7-0.068%24 May
cache5–13-0.0128%23 May
cache13–4-0.029%20 May
cache12–120.0031%19 May
cache12–12-0.0112%18 May
nuke13–40.0819%17 May
mirage13–30.0215%16 May
anubis2–13-0.0625%16 May
ancient10–13-0.0312%15 May
mirage13–70.0124%13 May
ancient13–100.0319%13 May
cache9–13-0.0738%11 May
cache10–13-0.0424%10 May
nuke13–6-0.0910%10 May
mirage13–40.0523%10 May
anubis13–3-0.0317%9 May
nuke5–13-0.0223%6 May
ancient9–13-0.0123%6 May
mirage13–110.0218%2 May
cache6–13-0.0850%30 Apr
ancient13–3-0.0122%30 Apr
cache13–8-0.0422%29 Apr
cache13–50.1230%28 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0315%26 Apr
dust213–80.0021%24 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0729%21 Apr
italy6–13-0.0235%16 Apr
nuke13–60.0224%16 Apr
anubis13–40.0124%15 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0319%13 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →