wailfy — CS2 Stats

SE76561199073937490[U:1:1113671762]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,098Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,843Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.9 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating25,449Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5564 of 56714 tracked

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

25,449Peak Premier on CSDB

2,618Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,618
Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 382 to go
Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 25,449
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,551 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-29
Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,824), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Red band median
Headshot rate	72.8%	50.0%
Shot accuracy	10.2%	13.5%
Kill/death ratio	1.50	1.13
Match win rate	49.7%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94

Positioning69

Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateLWLWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.4

Aggression8.6

Utility4.0

Positioning6.9

Opening Duels6.0

Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 46% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4

Positioning6.9

Utility4.0

Mechanics8.4

Opening Duels6.0

Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.9/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.05

first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time565ms−24ms

first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms

Headshot accuracy33.2%−0.7%

first ⅓ avg 33.9% → last ⅓ avg 33.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.42Best rating — nuke 9–3

13–1Biggest win — mirage

8Longest win streak

10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 12cacheWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	24	12–12	50%	0.03
ancient	B	17	9–8	53%	0.04
nuke	B	14	7–7	50%	0.07
dust2	C	14	6–8	43%	0.05
anubis	S	12	8–4	67%	0.03
inferno	A	8	5–3	63%	0.05
cache	D	6	2–4	33%	0.08
vertigo	—	3	2–1	67%	0.19
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

165,138Lifetime kills

1.50K/D · Top 10% of Red band

3,344Matches

49.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Red band

72.8%Headshot % · Top 5% of Red band

10.2%Shot accuracy

16,297MVPs

2,798Hours (in match)

2,226Bombs planted

3,686Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4798,271

M4A4 / M4A1-S17,236

AWP12,460

Desert Eagle12,171

P2000 / USP-S6,840

Glock-184,419

MP92,446

Galil AR1,478

Knife1,311

MAC-101,304

Lifetime map wins

7,557inferno

4,452dust2

2,671nuke

1,999vertigo

1,309train

266cbble

72office

30lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,228Matches

53%Win rate

1.28Avg K/D

83.8ADR

64%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win

28%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	337	54%	1.32	19.0
Anubis	174	55%	1.35	19.5
Ancient	149	48%	1.26	17.8
Inferno	146	52%	1.23	17.8
Nuke	101	54%	1.19	17.0
Dust2	58	40%	1.01	15.7
Vertigo	44	66%	1.41	18.9
Train	42	55%	1.30	19.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

34.1%Headshot accuracy

37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.5%Spray accuracy

87.7%Counter-strafing

9.4°Preaim

562msReaction time

45.6%T opening success

62.7%CT opening success

0.42Enemies flashed / flash

5.4%Flash assists

6.32HE damage / grenade

8.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4172 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	11–13	0.00	25%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.02	46%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.00	32%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.17	43%	24 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	30%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.02	47%	20 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.06	32%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	26%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.03	21%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	42%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.01	37%	18 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	50%	17 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	30%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.00	41%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	36%	16 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	40%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.00	32%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.06	37%	12 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.08	23%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.05	41%	10 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.01	41%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	28%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.04	16%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	35%	5 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	28%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.02	39%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	34%	2 Aug →
anubis	17–19	0.01	32%	2 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.06	29%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.11	23%	2 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.05	19%	2 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	21%	28 Jul →
nuke	14–16	0.13	38%	27 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.12	54%	27 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	50%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.08	27%	20 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.00	29%	20 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.05	35%	19 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.03	29%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.04	25%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.09	24%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.00	25%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.03	33%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.13	39%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.01	17%	18 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.05	36%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.20	30%	18 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.04	39%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.05	27%	18 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.05	39%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.08	34%	18 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.07	30%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.08	44%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.15	40%	15 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.06	33%	15 Jul →
cache	16–12	0.11	33%	23 Jun →
cache	11–13	0.08	33%	23 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.07	43%	22 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.04	34%	9 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.03	37%	9 Jun →
nuke	9–3	0.42	36%	9 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	41%	9 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.12	30%	9 Jun →
nuke	12–12	0.06	29%	4 Jun →
ancient	5–13	0.07	34%	4 Jun →
inferno	1–13	0.00	33%	4 Jun →
ancient	15–15	0.07	30%	4 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.17	35%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.18	33%	4 Jun →
vertigo	13–7	0.14	44%	4 Jun →
vertigo	12–12	0.22	34%	3 Jun →
cache	3–13	0.02	47%	3 Jun →
inferno	3–13	0.06	27%	2 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.11	49%	2 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.08	39%	1 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.04	36%	1 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.02	27%	1 Jun →
nuke	6–13	0.12	63%	1 Jun →
cache	6–13	0.06	34%	27 May →
mirage	5–13	0.04	16%	27 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	29%	21 May →
inferno	7–13	0.02	30%	19 May →
mirage	13–7	0.04	26%	19 May →
overpass	1–13	0.01	33%	16 May →
anubis	13–11	0.02	40%	16 May →
anubis	14–16	-0.01	25%	16 May →
anubis	13–1	0.13	34%	16 May →
nuke	16–14	0.04	37%	16 May →
inferno	16–14	0.03	32%	15 May →
inferno	13–7	0.02	40%	15 May →
mirage	13–5	0.07	25%	14 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	42%	12 May →
mirage	13–3	0.01	18%	12 May →
mirage	13–10	0.05	41%	6 May →
ancient	13–1	0.06	21%	6 May →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	24%	5 May →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	30%	30 Apr →
overpass	13–11	0.09	23%	27 Apr →
inferno	13–11	0.15	37%	27 Apr →
vertigo	9–4	0.22	46%	27 Apr →