WAVUEN

WAVUEN — CS2 Stats

DO76561199072525014[U:1:1112259286]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

350Tracked matches62%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,266Hours in CS32Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating7,183Light Blue band · top ~68.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 17 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,183 -3,921 17 Dec14 Sept · 19 days played
4,88911,174peak 11,17417 Dec14 Sept
11,452Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2025-12-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,991 below peak (11,174)
  • +570 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 2,817 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate49.5%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy11.7%11.2%12.0%0.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.230.991.02above
Match win rate48.2%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWAVUENFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER7,183 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning50
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40591Last 10040%Win rateLWLWWTWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · −84ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility4.2
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.0
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time593ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 7 Sept
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · anubis, 19 May
398msFastest reaction time · 7–2 · anubis, 22 Aug
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 29 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
38In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 58% over 12dust2Weakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC1971237%-0.01
anubisD1861233%0.01
dust2D1541127%0.00
infernoA148657%0.00
mirageC146843%0.02
nukeA127558%0.02
overpass41325%-0.03
cache31233%-0.01
train1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

28,207Lifetime kills
1.23K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
1,344Matches
48.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
49.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
11.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
3,573MVPs
516Hours (in match)
1,140Bombs planted
349Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,554nuke
1,365inferno
1,356dust2
643vertigo
257train
160cbble
56office
32lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

78Matches
49%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
84.1ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2055%1.2418.1
Anubis70%0.9418.0
Nuke683%1.6616.5
Vertigo667%0.9915.7
Inferno540%1.1615.8
Ancient475%1.2316.5
Dust2425%0.8812.3
Train2100%1.2417.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.4%Spray accuracy
79.9%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
588msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
46.5%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
12.95HE damage / grenade
5.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4847 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.2018% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–130.0422%14 Sept
inferno13–40.058%14 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0313%13 Sept
anubis13–100.0717%13 Sept
mirage13–50.0822%13 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0115%13 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0019%13 Sept
cache0–13-0.0019%12 Sept
cache13–30.0214%12 Sept
ancient13–40.0813%12 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0116%12 Sept
dust213–10-0.0314%12 Sept
nuke9–20.0413%12 Sept
dust213–8-0.0028%12 Sept
nuke1–5-0.0520%10 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0628%10 Sept
inferno9–50.0119%9 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0528%9 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0112%9 Sept
ancient13–70.0110%9 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0321%8 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0619%8 Sept
ancient16–13-0.0319%8 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0221%8 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0426%8 Sept
anubis13–100.1016%8 Sept
anubis4–130.0126%7 Sept
inferno13–70.1425%7 Sept
ancient13–90.0726%7 Sept
inferno13–80.0325%7 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0220%7 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0115%7 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0435%3 Sept
cache9–13-0.0515%3 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0725%3 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0620%3 Sept
nuke13–80.0216%2 Sept
anubis14–160.0010%2 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0223%2 Sept
mirage7–130.0925%1 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0328%1 Sept
nuke9–130.0524%28 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0420%28 Aug
mirage0–2-0.010%23 Aug
dust26–130.0113%23 Aug
dust211–13-0.0114%22 Aug
anubis7–2-0.088%22 Aug
dust27–13-0.0131%22 Aug
mirage13–60.1223%20 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0511%19 Aug
anubis9–130.0320%19 Aug
mirage13–60.0020%18 Aug
nuke13–100.0433%18 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0114%26 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0218%26 Jul
mirage6–130.0031%26 Jul
dust216–120.0730%26 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0512%28 Jun
dust25–130.0427%28 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0219%18 Jun
anubis6–130.0423%18 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0323%17 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0025%17 Jun
anubis16–120.0822%16 Jun
inferno13–90.1027%12 Jun
dust20–130.0130%12 Jun
dust22–13-0.0224%5 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0030%2 Jun
nuke13–110.0823%2 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0414%1 Jun
nuke16–130.0432%31 May
ancient9–130.0319%30 May
overpass5–13-0.0628%20 May
dust26–13-0.0321%20 May
inferno2–13-0.0721%20 May
anubis8–130.0118%19 May
nuke10–130.0618%19 May
anubis13–70.0836%19 May
ancient13–50.0120%19 May
anubis16–140.0515%29 Apr
dust25–13-0.0315%29 Apr
mirage13–20.0331%29 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0617%29 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0420%22 Apr
dust23–13-0.0213%22 Apr
ancient3–13-0.099%22 Apr
dust213–100.0328%15 Apr
ancient2–130.0320%22 Mar
anubis10–130.0028%22 Mar
ancient5–130.0023%16 Jan
overpass4–13-0.0215%14 Jan
mirage13–20.0713%13 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0217%13 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0321%12 Jan
nuke13–70.0717%11 Jan
overpass16–14-0.0011%9 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0314%18 Dec
train5–13-0.0127%17 Dec
inferno13–7-0.0112%17 Dec
dust211–13-0.0513%17 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →