K

K — CS2 Stats

AU76561199069883103[U:1:1109617375]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,685Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating13,122Blue band · top ~38.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13911 of 20290 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 738 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKFACEITLevel 3 · 738 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER13,122 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning42
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48502Last 10048%Win rateLLWLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3
Aggression4.2
Utility4.0
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch1.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.2
Utility4.0
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time593ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy12.1%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 11.6% → last ⅓ avg 12.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 13–2
132Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 18anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2091145%-0.00
mirageS1812667%0.01
infernoC1771041%-0.00
ancientB157847%-0.01
dust2B137654%-0.00
anubisD92722%-0.01
cacheB84450%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

37Matches
41%Win rate
0.71Avg K/D
71.1ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21030%0.548.8
Nuke771%0.7412.7
Mirage475%0.7814.0
Ancient3100%1.7021.0
Inferno20%0.7414.0
Overpass10%0.459.0
Cache1100%1.0924.0
Anubis10%0.254.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.0%Headshot accuracy
40.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
598msReaction time
28.3%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
10.90HE damage / grenade
2.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.0298% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4871 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.2662% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–130.046%27 Aug
mirage2–130.025%27 Aug
mirage13–9-0.018%27 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0018%27 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0117%27 Aug
mirage13–50.0111%27 Aug
dust213–11-0.0715%27 Aug
inferno13–20.0319%27 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0719%25 Aug
cache16–14-0.018%25 Aug
mirage13–30.1016%25 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0713%25 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0911%24 Aug
nuke10–13-0.087%24 Aug
ancient11–130.0515%24 Aug
nuke15–150.0019%24 Aug
mirage13–80.0114%22 Aug
mirage16–140.0510%22 Aug
mirage8–130.1114%22 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0315%22 Aug
ancient7–13-0.062%20 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0210%20 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0610%20 Aug
anubis9–130.0118%20 Aug
dust213–80.039%20 Aug
nuke13–20.0716%20 Aug
mirage13–70.0314%20 Aug
mirage4–13-0.047%20 Aug
ancient13–40.089%20 Aug
nuke8–13-0.077%20 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0116%20 Aug
nuke16–140.0113%20 Aug
anubis9–130.0010%20 Aug
dust213–90.0715%20 Aug
nuke9–130.0120%20 Aug
nuke13–30.1412%19 Aug
cache15–150.0215%19 Aug
mirage13–110.0218%19 Aug
inferno8–130.046%19 Aug
anubis7–130.0315%19 Aug
ancient13–90.0319%19 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0129%19 Aug
dust213–7-0.0220%19 Aug
dust210–130.0013%19 Aug
nuke7–130.009%16 Aug
anubis13–60.0317%16 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0511%16 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0420%16 Aug
dust24–130.0113%16 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0118%16 Aug
dust213–100.0212%16 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0611%16 Aug
dust210–130.0119%16 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0219%16 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0412%16 Aug
mirage13–50.0624%16 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0219%16 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0615%16 Aug
ancient13–90.0211%16 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0014%16 Aug
nuke8–13-0.038%16 Aug
anubis9–10.0619%16 Aug
inferno3–13-0.027%13 Aug
inferno4–130.036%13 Aug
dust26–13-0.0119%13 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0815%13 Aug
dust22–13-0.0313%13 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0713%13 Aug
inferno13–11-0.038%13 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0711%13 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0218%13 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0810%12 Aug
inferno13–6-0.055%12 Aug
nuke13–90.0614%12 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0624%12 Aug
ancient10–13-0.049%12 Aug
inferno13–90.1115%12 Aug
dust213–100.0120%11 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0510%11 Aug
cache8–13-0.0424%11 Aug
nuke13–80.0110%11 Aug
cache13–16-0.027%11 Aug
ancient13–80.0411%11 Aug
mirage13–70.086%11 Aug
inferno13–20.089%11 Aug
cache13–10-0.0113%11 Aug
nuke13–6-0.023%11 Aug
inferno3–13-0.035%11 Aug
dust25–13-0.0414%11 Aug
ancient16–120.0210%11 Aug
dust213–11-0.007%10 Aug
mirage1–13-0.066%10 Aug
cache13–70.069%10 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0811%10 Aug
ancient12–160.0213%10 Aug
ancient10–13-0.007%10 Aug
cache13–2-0.0116%10 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0210%10 Aug
cache7–130.0516%10 Aug
inferno13–20.1419%10 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →