GiveawaySign In
Leo

Leo — CS2 Stats

DE76561199068768209[U:1:1108502481]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

959Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,980Hours in CS40Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches49——
Win rate71%——
K/D1.40——
Headshot %63%——

Measured 24 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches125——
Win rate70%——
K/D1.44——
Headshot %59%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,745), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate50.2%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy6.4%13.0%13.3%6.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.241.061.07above
Match win rate36.5%46.3%46.9%10.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLeoFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning58
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–33–14Last 10053%Win rateWLWWTLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · +54ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility5.8
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch6.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning5.8
Utility5.8
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact8.8

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time518ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 514ms → last ⅓ avg 518ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 25.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–3 · vertigo, 25 Sept →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · fachwerk, 24 Sept →
297msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · italy, 9 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
5–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

boulderBest map · 67% over 12shelterWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
vertigoA5734–2360%0.02
boulderS128–467%0.00
infernoD71–614%0.04
fachwerkD62–433%0.07
shelterD50–50%0.00
italy—43–175%-0.02
anubis—32–167%0.07
mirage—21–150%0.00
nuke—22–0100%0.02
cache—20–20%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

41,722Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
2,892Matches
36.5%Match win rate
50.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
6.4%Shot accuracy
6,830MVPs
1,180Hours (in match)
1,063Bombs planted
381Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,065
M4A4 / M4A1-S6,743
AWP6,168
Desert Eagle3,156
P2000 / USP-S2,697
SSG 081,500
Glock-181,192
Galil AR1,024
MP9803
P250444

Lifetime map wins

3,343vertigo
2,596dust2
2,092inferno
542train
490nuke
344office
294italy
25lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

60Matches
65%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
89.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

54%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1669%1.6617.8
Dust21145%1.1618.3
Inferno888%1.3217.4
Nuke667%1.1615.0
Anubis683%1.4518.7
Overpass450%1.0117.0
Ancient367%0.8815.0
Cache2100%0.567.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
87.4%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
507msReaction time
51.1%T opening success
49.4%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
11.20HE damage / grenade
7.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4307 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–110.0018%1 Oct →
vertigo7–13-0.0510%1 Oct →
fachwerk13–70.0333%1 Oct →
vertigo13–110.0140%1 Oct →
boulder12–12-0.0314%1 Oct →
vertigo11–13-0.0429%1 Oct →
boulder13–50.0128%30 Sept →
fachwerk13–70.0821%30 Sept →
shelter6–13-0.0028%30 Sept →
boulder13–30.0329%30 Sept →
shelter6–130.0627%30 Sept →
vertigo2–13-0.0318%30 Sept →
boulder13–90.1022%30 Sept →
vertigo13–6-0.0026%30 Sept →
shelter10–130.0221%30 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0131%27 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0314%27 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.0216%27 Sept →
vertigo13–8-0.0529%27 Sept →
vertigo13–4-0.067%27 Sept →
boulder12–120.0319%26 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0215%26 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0632%26 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0818%26 Sept →
vertigo9–130.0419%26 Sept →
vertigo13–10.0229%26 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0334%25 Sept →
vertigo13–30.1836%25 Sept →
vertigo9–130.0425%25 Sept →
vertigo13–3-0.0317%25 Sept →
vertigo13–70.019%25 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0417%25 Sept →
vertigo13–50.0741%25 Sept →
vertigo13–8-0.0031%25 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0731%24 Sept →
vertigo13–6-0.0315%24 Sept →
fachwerk9–130.0644%24 Sept →
vertigo7–130.0229%24 Sept →
vertigo13–3-0.0033%24 Sept →
vertigo13–7-0.0317%24 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0617%23 Sept →
vertigo0–4-0.090%23 Sept →
boulder13–6-0.0518%20 Sept →
boulder12–12-0.1122%20 Sept →
anubis12–12-0.0316%20 Sept →
vertigo9–13-0.0219%20 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0724%20 Sept →
fachwerk12–120.1019%17 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0324%17 Sept →
vertigo13–50.0522%16 Sept →
vertigo13–60.0410%16 Sept →
vertigo13–70.1624%16 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0119%16 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0812%16 Sept →
vertigo13–3-0.0510%16 Sept →
vertigo13–70.1123%16 Sept →
boulder6–13-0.0829%16 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0126%16 Sept →
anubis13–10.1516%16 Sept →
anubis13–110.0819%16 Sept →
inferno10–130.0625%16 Sept →
nuke13–20.0324%16 Sept →
vertigo6–130.0717%16 Sept →
mirage10–130.0330%15 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0118%15 Sept →
vertigo10–130.1518%15 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0118%15 Sept →
inferno11–130.0625%13 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0536%13 Sept →
vertigo3–13-0.0125%13 Sept →
boulder13–6-0.0136%13 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0122%13 Sept →
inferno8–130.0626%10 Sept →
italy13–11-0.0229%10 Sept →
shelter5–13-0.0933%10 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0719%10 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0119%10 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.0221%10 Sept →
vertigo13–6-0.0123%10 Sept →
boulder13–40.0737%10 Sept →
boulder13–70.0116%10 Sept →
vertigo7–130.0513%9 Sept →
vertigo2–13-0.0528%9 Sept →
shelter10–130.0224%9 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0127%9 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0524%9 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0227%9 Sept →
vertigo11–130.0422%9 Sept →
italy10–13-0.1443%9 Sept →
boulder13–30.0832%9 Sept →
cache12–120.0227%9 Sept →
vertigo13–50.0913%9 Sept →
inferno13–60.1714%9 Sept →
nuke13–80.0217%8 Sept →
italy13–5-0.039%8 Sept →
fachwerk10–130.0938%8 Sept →
vertigo13–50.0316%8 Sept →
fachwerk4–130.0333%8 Sept →
italy13–60.1129%8 Sept →
vertigo13–5-0.0038%8 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.

Explore CSDB.gg

Related

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other gameseDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPIcm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turnResolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutionsCrosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

CS2 Skin WordleName the skin from an extreme close-upModel AccuracyPrediction model accuracy statsTeam Head-to-HeadCompare pro team stats

Learn & Explore

CS2 vs Rainbow Six SiegeDestructibility and operators vs pure utilityCS2 Player Roles ExplainedEntry, support, AWPer, lurker, IGLCS2 Fixes & TroubleshootingStep-by-step fixes for every common CS2 problem