雪雁 北京烤鸭

雪雁 北京烤鸭 — CS2 Stats

CN76561199067333975[U:1:1107068247]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

164Tracked matches50%Win rate2025Tracked since
134Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,514Blue band · top ~31% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,514 +4,019 19 May – 2 Oct · 26 days played
10,18214,999peak 14,99919 May2 Oct
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-05-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 485 below peak (14,999)
  • +385 over 30 days · steady
  • +656 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 486 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate49.0%42.0%44.3%above
Shot accuracy0.0%9.6%11.9%11.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.080.981.03above
Match win rate55.7%43.8%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG雪雁 北京烤鸭PREMIER14,514 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning44
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–39–2Last 10059%Win rateWLWLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility4.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.4
Utility4.3
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time533ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 16 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 3 Jun →
328msFastest reaction time · 0–3 · inferno, 29 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 3 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 18ancientWeakest map · 50% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2213–959%-0.00
infernoS1812–667%0.01
anubisA1710–759%0.02
ancientB168–850%-0.02
dust2A127–558%-0.02
nukeA95–456%-0.01
overpass—31–233%0.05
cache—22–0100%-0.02
poseidon—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

2,994Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Blue band
194Matches
55.7%Match win rate · Top 5% of Blue band
49.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Blue band
0.0%Shot accuracy
415MVPs
63Hours (in match)
119Bombs planted
43Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

225inferno
213dust2
163nuke
65vertigo
26train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
73.4%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
547msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
5.65HE damage / grenade
6.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3944 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.4735% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0113%2 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0313%2 Oct →
mirage13–100.0427%29 Sept →
nuke3–6-0.0425%29 Sept →
ancient13–1-0.0518%27 Sept →
dust21–11-0.1114%27 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0611%27 Sept →
ancient13–50.049%25 Sept →
inferno13–70.0314%25 Sept →
mirage8–130.0618%22 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0519%22 Sept →
mirage13–100.0014%22 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.1125%16 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0325%16 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0421%16 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.059%13 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0020%5 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0321%5 Sept →
anubis7–130.0133%1 Sept →
nuke13–70.0716%1 Sept →
anubis7–130.0417%1 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0113%1 Sept →
anubis3–130.0118%26 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0950%26 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0326%26 Aug →
inferno6–130.0214%26 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0523%26 Aug →
inferno0–2-0.030%17 Aug →
inferno13–40.0016%17 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0124%17 Aug →
anubis13–50.1819%16 Aug →
dust213–30.0312%16 Aug →
inferno13–70.0417%16 Aug →
dust20–13-0.100%16 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0326%16 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0724%16 Aug →
mirage13–30.0015%16 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0422%31 Jul →
mirage11–130.018%29 Jul →
inferno0–3-0.040%29 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0621%29 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0717%29 Jul →
mirage13–90.0221%24 Jun →
ancient3–13-0.0713%24 Jun →
anubis15–150.0214%24 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0327%24 Jun →
mirage12–0-0.026%19 Jun →
anubis13–80.0726%19 Jun →
inferno13–70.0130%19 Jun →
nuke13–60.0217%16 Jun →
inferno13–8-0.0232%16 Jun →
dust213–90.0017%16 Jun →
dust213–100.0419%16 Jun →
inferno11–130.1613%5 Jun →
mirage13–10.0520%4 Jun →
overpass8–130.0324%3 Jun →
mirage0–13-0.10100%3 Jun →
ancient15–15-0.0314%3 Jun →
ancient13–00.0212%3 Jun →
anubis13–4-0.0021%3 Jun →
inferno10–80.0120%31 May →
dust213–40.0515%30 May →
mirage11–13-0.0114%29 May →
anubis13–110.0419%29 May →
inferno13–80.0619%29 May →
inferno5–0-0.098%29 May →
anubis13–30.0628%29 May →
mirage13–3-0.115%29 May →
nuke5–13-0.0719%29 May →
inferno6–130.0325%29 May →
anubis13–9-0.0021%29 May →
inferno11–13-0.0219%28 May →
nuke13–60.0417%28 May →
inferno13–50.0016%27 May →
ancient13–80.0112%27 May →
mirage16–120.0011%26 May →
mirage10–13-0.065%26 May →
ancient5–130.0819%26 May →
anubis8–130.0210%25 May →
overpass13–40.0825%25 May →
mirage11–130.0320%24 May →
dust213–10-0.0119%24 May →
poseidon9–30.0629%24 May →
dust216–12-0.0117%24 May →
dust27–1-0.000%24 May →
overpass9–130.0421%23 May →
mirage13–70.0418%23 May →
ancient13–20.0321%23 May →
mirage8–13-0.0223%23 May →
mirage13–11-0.0518%23 May →
inferno13–7-0.0119%23 May →
mirage13–160.0110%23 May →
anubis13–80.1217%23 May →
nuke13–50.0220%23 May →
mirage13–70.0232%23 May →
mirage6–130.0323%22 May →
nuke13–11-0.0319%22 May →
ancient13–90.0513%19 May →
mirage13–50.0213%19 May →
nuke9–13-0.0616%19 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.