de_Titan

de_Titan — CS2 Stats

ZA76561199066959086[U:1:1106693358]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,924Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,071Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,554Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#43375 of 222448 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,924 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 22 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,554 -2,476 22 Aug15 Sept · 23 days played
22,49525,358peak 25,35822 Aug15 Sept
26,084Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-08-22

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,804 below peak (25,358)
  • -2,476 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,446 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches3317+16
Win rate48%41%+7pp
K/D1.100.94+0.16
Headshot %51%56%−5pp

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate52.3%43.8%44.9%above
Shot accuracy11.3%12.0%12.4%1.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.501.021.04above
Match win rate48.0%44.7%45.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGde_TitanFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER22,554 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning53
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52471Last 10052%Win rateWLLWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −66ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility3.7
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch2.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.3
Utility3.7
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time586ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 14 Sept
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 28 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 1 Sept
13–3Biggest win · inferno, 14 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
910In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 86% over 7nukeWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisS2316770%-0.01
dust2A22121055%0.00
ancientC1771041%-0.01
infernoC167944%0.02
cacheC83538%-0.01
mirageS76186%0.03
nukeD71614%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

133,993Lifetime kills
1.50K/D · Top 5% of Level 5 players
5,974Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
52.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
11.3%Shot accuracy
10,848MVPs
2,071Hours (in match)
3,366Bombs planted
1,286Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4741,166
AWP17,756
MP92,637
P2502,176
MAC-102,145

Lifetime map wins

18,720dust2
4,625inferno
2,025nuke
1,473vertigo
862train
70office
70cbble
70lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

122Matches
46%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
65.5ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4648%0.9013.1
Anubis2756%1.0214.5
Ancient1833%0.7713.2
Inferno1346%0.6912.8
Dust21145%0.8712.1
Nuke425%0.7611.3
Cache333%0.8412.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
86.4%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
605msReaction time
43.6%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
10.59HE damage / grenade
3.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.7838 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–60.0220%14 Sept
mirage9–130.0217%14 Sept
dust211–13-0.0226%14 Sept
inferno13–30.2537%14 Sept
anubis13–110.0029%14 Sept
inferno4–130.039%13 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0321%12 Sept
dust213–16-0.0516%12 Sept
ancient13–5-0.0121%11 Sept
dust213–8-0.0118%11 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0613%11 Sept
dust213–11-0.0228%11 Sept
ancient13–110.0114%11 Sept
cache13–11-0.0024%11 Sept
cache7–13-0.0224%10 Sept
anubis13–30.0321%8 Sept
mirage13–60.0921%8 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0225%7 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0015%7 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0026%7 Sept
ancient0–6-0.140%6 Sept
anubis13–6-0.056%6 Sept
nuke13–16-0.0428%6 Sept
dust28–13-0.0914%6 Sept
nuke13–70.0437%5 Sept
inferno11–130.0224%5 Sept
dust213–40.0731%5 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0613%4 Sept
cache6–130.0742%4 Sept
dust29–13-0.0127%4 Sept
ancient16–120.0719%3 Sept
cache12–16-0.0730%2 Sept
inferno13–80.0018%2 Sept
mirage13–80.0117%2 Sept
ancient13–4-0.0310%2 Sept
dust211–13-0.0117%2 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0415%2 Sept
anubis5–130.0620%2 Sept
inferno13–50.026%2 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0317%2 Sept
cache13–9-0.0316%1 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0819%1 Sept
dust23–13-0.0814%1 Sept
anubis13–9-0.049%1 Sept
dust213–30.0223%1 Sept
mirage16–130.0116%1 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0813%31 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0214%31 Aug
anubis13–90.0330%31 Aug
cache6–13-0.0424%31 Aug
dust210–13-0.0215%31 Aug
dust213–100.0134%30 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0530%30 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0123%30 Aug
cache13–60.0024%29 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0421%29 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0527%29 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0329%29 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0218%29 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0635%29 Aug
dust213–40.1947%28 Aug
ancient7–130.0130%28 Aug
dust213–11-0.0123%28 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0123%28 Aug
cache5–13-0.0419%28 Aug
ancient13–90.0313%28 Aug
mirage13–50.0221%28 Aug
anubis13–60.0022%28 Aug
anubis13–110.0425%28 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0427%28 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0226%28 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0425%27 Aug
ancient13–110.0638%27 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0121%27 Aug
dust210–13-0.0126%27 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0228%27 Aug
anubis16–130.0322%26 Aug
inferno13–80.0720%26 Aug
dust24–13-0.0617%26 Aug
dust213–60.0221%25 Aug
dust213–70.0832%25 Aug
inferno11–130.0426%25 Aug
mirage13–80.0821%25 Aug
anubis13–50.0826%25 Aug
dust213–30.0017%25 Aug
inferno9–130.0229%25 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0121%24 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0524%24 Aug
dust213–60.0431%24 Aug
ancient7–130.0115%24 Aug
dust213–40.1127%24 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0517%24 Aug
anubis13–70.0115%23 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0323%23 Aug
dust21–13-0.120%23 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0518%22 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0128%22 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0334%22 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0419%22 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0132%22 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →