Blur

Blur — CS2 Stats

GB76561199057104934[U:1:1096839206]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

808Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
952Hours in CS32Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,788Blue band · top ~34.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,491 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,788 +2,190 11 Sept – 6 Oct · 12 days played
11,59813,865peak 13,86511 Sept6 Oct
13,865Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,491Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-06-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,491
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 40 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-26
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 77 below peak (13,865)
  • +2,190 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,212 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-26
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-26

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,332), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate53.6%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy1.9%13.3%13.7%11.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.011.071.090.08 short
Match win rate47.4%46.9%48.4%1.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBlurFACEITLevel 9 · 1,491 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER13,788 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,491csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning65
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–48Last 10052%Win rateLLWLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −6.3pp headshot accuracy · −4ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.9
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 42% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.5
Utility5.9
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time575ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy24.4%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 14 Sept →
59%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · mirage, 29 Sept →
414msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · dust2, 8 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 30% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2215–768%0.02
ancientD206–1430%0.01
nukeB1910–953%0.02
anubisA159–660%0.02
infernoC135–838%0.02
dust2S86–275%-0.02
cache—31–233%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

21,179Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
1,181Matches
47.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
53.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
1.9%Shot accuracy
2,634MVPs
982Hours (in match)
843Bombs planted
244Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,754dust2
1,599inferno
1,037nuke
141vertigo
81cbble
66train
15lake
4ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

649Matches
51%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
83.9ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15452%1.0916.2
Ancient13453%1.0917.0
Inferno9345%1.0415.6
Anubis8353%1.2116.9
Dust28055%1.1016.6
Nuke4854%1.0917.7
Cache2846%1.0414.9
Overpass2352%1.1317.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
87.1%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
576msReaction time
58.3%T opening success
41.5%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
7.85HE damage / grenade
13.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.0216%11 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0318%10 Oct →
inferno16–130.0228%10 Oct →
dust21–13-0.1219%8 Oct →
ancient5–130.0520%8 Oct →
mirage13–80.0118%8 Oct →
nuke13–40.0224%6 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0524%5 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0312%3 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0131%1 Oct →
mirage13–160.0216%30 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0422%30 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0328%29 Sept →
mirage13–110.0059%29 Sept →
dust213–160.0324%29 Sept →
dust213–90.1223%28 Sept →
inferno9–130.1528%28 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0231%27 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0224%27 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0215%27 Sept →
anubis13–40.0224%27 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0728%25 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0326%24 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0623%23 Sept →
anubis13–90.0929%23 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0321%22 Sept →
mirage9–130.0419%22 Sept →
mirage5–130.0126%21 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0525%21 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0617%21 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0728%20 Sept →
anubis13–70.1132%20 Sept →
mirage13–110.0526%20 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.065%19 Sept →
ancient17–19-0.0126%19 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0416%19 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0021%18 Sept →
anubis13–60.0620%18 Sept →
anubis11–130.0115%17 Sept →
anubis13–60.0421%17 Sept →
anubis16–130.0225%17 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0314%15 Sept →
nuke8–130.0444%15 Sept →
ancient8–130.0525%15 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0330%15 Sept →
nuke13–10.0619%15 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0024%14 Sept →
mirage13–90.0112%14 Sept →
mirage13–60.1922%14 Sept →
mirage13–10.1325%14 Sept →
mirage16–140.0223%13 Sept →
nuke13–60.0734%12 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0326%12 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0326%12 Sept →
anubis6–130.0333%12 Sept →
inferno13–40.1024%12 Sept →
ancient11–130.0629%11 Sept →
nuke13–80.0927%11 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.066%11 Sept →
ancient25–230.0423%11 Sept →
mirage13–60.0123%11 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0120%11 Sept →
ancient14–160.0634%10 Sept →
inferno13–60.1321%10 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0340%10 Sept →
ancient11–130.0020%9 Sept →
nuke13–80.1229%9 Sept →
nuke13–50.0620%9 Sept →
nuke4–130.0825%9 Sept →
cache13–30.0337%9 Sept →
ancient13–40.0620%8 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0216%6 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0230%6 Sept →
anubis13–20.1019%4 Sept →
ancient10–130.0318%3 Sept →
nuke16–120.0120%2 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0526%2 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0213%2 Sept →
inferno13–60.1236%1 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0224%1 Sept →
nuke13–110.0331%31 Aug →
mirage13–50.0026%31 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0614%31 Aug →
ancient13–90.0417%27 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0427%27 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0210%7 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0523%2 Aug →
inferno13–80.0421%30 Jul →
mirage13–100.0530%29 Jul →
anubis13–100.0325%29 Jul →
anubis13–16-0.0225%27 Jul →
mirage13–70.0229%25 Jul →
ancient13–80.0823%25 Jul →
nuke9–130.0134%24 Jul →
mirage5–130.0233%24 Jul →
anubis13–70.0524%19 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0120%7 Jul →
nuke9–130.0331%1 Jul →
mirage13–90.0314%30 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0544%30 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.