パトリック

パトリック — CS2 Stats

BZ76561199056691073[U:1:1096425345]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

862Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,188Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,514Purple band · top ~22.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 862 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 4 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,514 -5,015 5 Mar13 Sept · 22 days played
16,51424,181peak 24,1815 Mar13 Sept
24,500Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-03-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 7,667 below peak (24,181)
  • -2,808 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,486 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 8 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 8 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 8 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate46.8%46.8%48.3%1.5% short
Shot accuracy9.7%13.0%13.2%3.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.131.061.07above
Match win rate47.8%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGパトリックFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER16,514 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning39
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateWWLWWTLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.4
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 46 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning3.9
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time577ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 5 Mar
42%Best headshot accuracy · 7–2 · ancient, 5 Mar
430msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 12 Mar
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 5 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W2Current streak
128In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 68% over 28ancientWeakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2819968%0.01
infernoB20101050%0.00
dust2C1881044%-0.01
ancientC1771041%-0.01
anubisC125742%-0.00
nuke21150%0.04
overpass2020%-0.05
cache1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

54,265Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
2,915Matches
47.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
46.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
9.7%Shot accuracy
6,967MVPs
1,188Hours (in match)
1,923Bombs planted
733Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,898
AWP3,024
MP92,136
MAC-102,049
P2501,294

Lifetime map wins

5,188inferno
3,350dust2
1,894vertigo
1,551nuke
842train
133cbble
52office
11italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

660Matches
51%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
87.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14054%1.2016.1
Anubis8949%1.1017.3
Ancient8153%1.2017.4
Inferno6149%0.9615.0
Vertigo4344%1.2017.2
Dust23636%0.8714.0
Nuke3352%1.3018.3
Overpass1346%1.2517.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
85.0%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
576msReaction time
30.9%T opening success
37.8%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
10.25HE damage / grenade
8.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.8673% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–50.0127%31 Jul
anubis13–100.0118%30 Jul
dust25–13-0.0723%30 Jul
inferno13–30.034%29 Jul
nuke13–50.0128%29 Jul
ancient15–150.0115%29 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0218%29 Jul
ancient16–140.0014%29 Jul
dust25–13-0.0312%28 Jul
inferno12–160.0122%28 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0215%28 Jul
ancient11–130.0027%27 Jul
inferno9–130.0412%27 Jul
anubis13–5-0.049%27 Jul
dust213–60.0032%27 Jul
cache3–13-0.0519%27 Jul
mirage13–50.028%27 Jul
dust213–9-0.0320%26 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0512%26 Jul
ancient11–130.0225%26 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0418%26 Jul
nuke7–130.0715%20 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0433%19 Jun
overpass15–15-0.0312%18 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0010%18 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0221%16 Jun
overpass3–13-0.0711%15 Jun
mirage9–130.0117%15 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0219%15 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0214%15 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0414%15 Jun
mirage13–100.0518%11 Jun
mirage13–90.0214%11 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0419%10 Jun
mirage13–70.0217%10 Jun
inferno16–140.0114%10 Jun
dust213–70.0418%10 Jun
dust24–13-0.0724%10 Jun
dust211–13-0.0820%10 Jun
dust213–7-0.1010%10 Jun
anubis13–3-0.0712%9 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0112%9 Jun
mirage13–50.0312%9 Jun
ancient12–160.0518%9 Jun
inferno7–130.0132%9 Jun
ancient13–100.0416%9 Jun
dust29–13-0.0113%8 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0511%8 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0814%14 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0611%14 Mar
dust26–130.0225%14 Mar
inferno3–90.0219%14 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0617%13 Mar
ancient13–90.0420%12 Mar
anubis15–150.0317%12 Mar
anubis4–130.0114%12 Mar
dust213–110.0823%12 Mar
mirage16–140.0413%11 Mar
inferno6–130.0313%11 Mar
anubis13–70.0018%11 Mar
dust24–13-0.037%11 Mar
ancient4–13-0.109%11 Mar
mirage10–130.0119%11 Mar
inferno5–130.0126%10 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0421%10 Mar
mirage13–40.0819%10 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0323%10 Mar
ancient13–70.0712%10 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0527%10 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0423%10 Mar
inferno16–140.0116%9 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0219%9 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0622%8 Mar
mirage13–80.0524%8 Mar
mirage3–13-0.1023%8 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0424%8 Mar
mirage13–90.0211%8 Mar
mirage16–140.0423%7 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0118%7 Mar
dust213–8-0.0120%7 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0118%7 Mar
inferno13–60.0413%7 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0213%7 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0428%7 Mar
inferno15–150.0315%7 Mar
dust23–13-0.0515%6 Mar
mirage13–40.0518%6 Mar
mirage13–60.0318%6 Mar
dust211–130.0318%6 Mar
ancient13–110.0415%6 Mar
mirage13–110.1115%6 Mar
dust213–90.0515%6 Mar
dust213–100.0122%5 Mar
anubis13–10.1411%5 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0014%5 Mar
mirage13–110.0512%5 Mar
ancient7–2-0.1142%5 Mar
inferno13–90.0018%5 Mar
dust211–130.0219%5 Mar
anubis10–130.0733%4 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →