fat Matias

fat Matias — CS2 Stats

BO76561199054405546[U:1:1094139818]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

1,359Tracked matches34%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,465Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.4 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,013 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,000 -1,494 21 Aug – 12 Oct · 24 days played
15,00018,350peak 18,35021 Aug12 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,013 +0 21 Sept – 28 Sept · 3 observations
1,0131,013peak 1,01321 Sept28 Sept
18,350Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,013Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-07-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,013
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 38 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-21
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,350 below peak (18,350)
  • -2,267 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-21
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches42——
Win rate36%——
K/D0.87——
Headshot %44%——

Measured 10 Sep 2026 → 13 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,998), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate44.8%42.7%43.7%above
Shot accuracy6.2%11.3%12.0%5.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.850.991.020.16 short
Match win rate42.5%43.9%44.7%2.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfat MatiasFACEITLevel 4 · 1,013 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,013csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning43
Utility26

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD37–57–6Last 10037%Win rateTLWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · +51ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim4.9
Utility2.6
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning4.3
Utility2.6
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels0.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time573ms−98ms
first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 22 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · nuke, 28 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · nuke, 2 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 18 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
2–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 5mirageWeakest map · 9% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB3516–1946%-0.02
anubisC207–1335%-0.02
ancientB168–850%0.00
mirageD111–109%-0.02
cacheD61–517%-0.02
infernoD61–517%-0.02
dust2A53–260%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (9% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

31,228Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
2,025Matches
42.5%Match win rate
44.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
6.2%Shot accuracy
4,411MVPs
800Hours (in match)
1,780Bombs planted
568Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

8,483nuke
1,147inferno
1,023lake
775dust2
615vertigo
270train
57cbble
53office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

137Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
75.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis3253%1.0113.5
Mirage2528%0.7712.0
Vertigo1771%1.1515.9
Inferno1547%0.9015.0
Ancient1457%1.0818.9
Nuke1267%1.1415.7
Dust2956%0.9513.7
Overpass1100%1.2714.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
68.8%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
577msReaction time
31.9%T opening success
17.0%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
8.48HE damage / grenade
2.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3611 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.8584% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

9% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust215–15-0.0519%12 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0822%12 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.067%12 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0217%10 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0425%9 Oct →
nuke6–130.0032%9 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.1110%8 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0318%8 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.047%2 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0423%1 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0017%1 Oct →
ancient14–160.0117%1 Oct →
vertigo11–13-0.0012%23 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0213%23 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0113%23 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0311%22 Sept →
inferno4–40.0517%22 Sept →
nuke13–20.1629%22 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0819%21 Sept →
mirage6–130.0115%20 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0216%20 Sept →
ancient13–70.0922%19 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0915%18 Sept →
anubis10–130.0113%18 Sept →
anubis13–70.0522%18 Sept →
ancient13–10.1429%18 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0011%17 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0210%17 Sept →
nuke13–110.0522%17 Sept →
mirage14–160.0022%17 Sept →
nuke13–80.0117%17 Sept →
nuke13–100.027%17 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0113%15 Sept →
anubis15–150.0312%15 Sept →
nuke13–100.006%15 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0415%15 Sept →
nuke7–130.0120%15 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.088%10 Sept →
nuke13–90.0416%10 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0911%10 Sept →
cache11–130.0124%9 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.008%9 Sept →
mirage8–130.0320%9 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0228%9 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0218%8 Sept →
nuke11–130.0210%8 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0915%7 Sept →
nuke16–140.0211%6 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0118%6 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0214%3 Sept →
dust213–80.0228%3 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0224%2 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0421%31 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.028%31 Aug →
ancient13–90.0114%31 Aug →
ancient13–10.0611%31 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0011%31 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0317%31 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0840%28 Aug →
ancient7–130.0222%24 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0319%24 Aug →
mirage13–160.0415%24 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0721%24 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0214%23 Aug →
anubis13–40.0118%23 Aug →
anubis12–16-0.0522%21 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0323%21 Aug →
ancient13–60.0022%21 Aug →
anubis12–16-0.0316%21 Aug →
anubis15–150.009%19 Aug →
mirage13–20.0418%19 Aug →
cache6–130.0113%19 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0623%16 Aug →
nuke1–13-0.035%16 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0113%14 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0321%12 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0514%12 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0415%11 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0010%11 Aug →
dust213–30.0119%11 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.1024%10 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0426%10 Aug →
mirage3–8-0.090%9 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.106%8 Aug →
ancient13–50.0417%5 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.0829%2 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0019%1 Aug →
nuke13–3-0.079%1 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0831%27 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0218%26 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.0922%26 Jul →
nuke13–10.0024%26 Jul →
anubis13–70.0220%24 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0319%24 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0611%15 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0138%15 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0718%13 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0920%11 Jul →
anubis1–13-0.0419%11 Jul →
nuke10–130.0114%11 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.