Lucy Bedroque Fan 3435

Lucy Bedroque Fan 3435 — CS2 Stats

GB76561199052471726[U:1:1092205998]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,996Tracked matches72%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,631 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (30 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,631 → 1,631
+86Tracked matches · now 1,996
+15.7ppWin rate · 56.7% → 72.4%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,631 +0 30 Aug – 2 Sept · 3 observations
1,6311,631peak 1,63130 Aug2 Sept
1,631Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-08-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,631
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 120 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLucy Bedroque Fan 3435FACEITLevel 9 · 1,631 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,631csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning76
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–42–2Last 10056%Win rateLWWWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility4.8
Positioning7.6
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 75% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 75% on T to 54% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning7.6
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels8.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time537ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 510ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%−3.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–3 · vertigo, 29 Aug →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 6–9 · vertigo, 29 Aug →
328msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · anubis, 21 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 2 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 92% over 13dust2Weakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC2310–1343%0.02
mirageB158–753%0.00
cacheS1312–192%0.03
nukeB126–650%0.00
infernoA106–460%0.03
ancientC94–544%0.01
vertigoS76–186%0.04
dust2D61–517%0.01
poseidon—21–150%-0.04
rush_001—10–10%-0.10
train—11–0100%0.03
overpass—11–0100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

626Matches
52%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
81.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15753%1.0015.5
Anubis11454%1.1515.8
Ancient9753%1.1716.7
Inferno7253%1.0715.0
Dust26743%0.9314.4
Nuke4747%1.3317.5
Vertigo3661%1.2415.3
Cache1872%1.2816.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
537msReaction time
75.5%T opening success
53.7%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
5.92HE damage / grenade
9.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3792 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–130.0417%30 Sept →
cache13–20.0219%30 Sept →
anubis13–40.0524%28 Sept →
cache16–140.008%28 Sept →
cache13–100.0117%27 Sept →
vertigo13–8-0.0614%27 Sept →
anubis14–160.0122%27 Sept →
rush_0015–8-0.1013%27 Sept →
train13–60.0333%27 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0524%26 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0914%23 Sept →
cache13–70.068%23 Sept →
anubis13–30.0810%23 Sept →
nuke13–100.0415%22 Sept →
anubis13–110.0917%22 Sept →
mirage13–100.0415%21 Sept →
cache13–30.0433%21 Sept →
cache13–40.0517%20 Sept →
anubis10–130.0221%19 Sept →
cache13–50.0416%19 Sept →
poseidon9–30.1515%18 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0212%17 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0116%17 Sept →
anubis13–60.039%16 Sept →
inferno13–10.1323%16 Sept →
cache12–10.0736%16 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0215%15 Sept →
inferno13–40.1521%15 Sept →
cache13–40.0522%14 Sept →
ancient14–160.0118%14 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0111%14 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0325%11 Sept →
dust29–130.0121%11 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0122%11 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0714%10 Sept →
anubis13–20.0626%10 Sept →
dust214–160.0624%8 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0624%7 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0214%7 Sept →
cache13–70.0025%6 Sept →
anubis13–80.0019%6 Sept →
cache13–60.0617%6 Sept →
anubis13–160.0122%6 Sept →
inferno10–130.0111%6 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0640%5 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0226%5 Sept →
nuke13–20.1331%5 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0119%5 Sept →
mirage22–250.0222%4 Sept →
mirage12–160.038%4 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0123%4 Sept →
nuke9–130.0922%3 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0513%3 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0613%3 Sept →
anubis12–160.0619%3 Sept →
vertigo13–9-0.0412%3 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0439%2 Sept →
nuke13–0-0.1118%2 Sept →
dust29–130.0926%2 Sept →
ancient13–50.1211%1 Sept →
anubis5–130.0512%31 Aug →
mirage13–60.0727%31 Aug →
vertigo16–140.0217%31 Aug →
cache13–50.0728%30 Aug →
inferno9–50.0617%29 Aug →
vertigo9–50.0545%29 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0637%29 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.1133%29 Aug →
vertigo12–90.0131%29 Aug →
nuke12–90.0514%29 Aug →
nuke9–50.0023%29 Aug →
overpass9–30.0823%29 Aug →
inferno9–40.1821%29 Aug →
vertigo6–90.0552%29 Aug →
nuke8–80.0229%29 Aug →
vertigo9–30.2450%29 Aug →
poseidon1–9-0.2310%29 Aug →
inferno4–9-0.1213%29 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0117%28 Aug →
anubis13–110.0618%28 Aug →
ancient13–80.0324%28 Aug →
inferno13–100.0024%27 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0124%27 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0721%27 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0414%24 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0618%24 Aug →
anubis11–130.0113%23 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0122%23 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0522%23 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0812%22 Aug →
anubis9–130.0048%21 Aug →
ancient13–90.0313%21 Aug →
anubis17–190.0913%21 Aug →
mirage13–110.0617%21 Aug →
mirage13–90.0418%20 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0510%20 Aug →
mirage13–30.0623%20 Aug →
anubis13–4-0.0114%19 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0224%19 Aug →
nuke13–30.0224%19 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.