iM_Kenzo

iM_Kenzo — CS2 Stats

ES76561199049164700[U:1:1088898972]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

579Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,203Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,042Top 25% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#43169 of 259900 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,042 +2,567 31 Jul – 31 Oct · 48 days played
20,47524,574peak 24,57431 Jul31 Oct
24,574Peak Premier in tracked matches
57Days played since 2026-07-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,532 below peak (24,574)
  • +181 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,093 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,958 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=38,294), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate37.0%46.9%49.3%12.3% short
Shot accuracy10.3%13.0%13.4%3.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.871.081.120.26 short
Match win rate47.2%46.7%48.5%1.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Red band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGiM_KenzoPREMIER23,042 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning69
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–43–6Last 10051%Win rateLLLWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility6.0
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch1.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.9
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels5.9
Win Impact4.4

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time562ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 15 Aug →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · cache, 29 Jul →
430msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · inferno, 15 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 15 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
7–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
25Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2512–1348%0.04
infernoC219–1243%0.04
dust2S1812–667%0.02
ancientS139–469%0.03
anubisD124–833%0.02
cacheC73–443%0.02
nuke—42–250%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

71,280Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
7,202Matches
47.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Pink band
37.0%Headshot %
10.3%Shot accuracy
5,151MVPs
2,203Hours (in match)
2,293Bombs planted
603Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,143
FAMAS3,517
AWP2,850
MP92,371
Knife847

Lifetime map wins

14,788inferno
3,060vertigo
3,017nuke
2,616dust2
1,173train
618cbble
274italy
191office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

97Matches
59%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
96.8ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2370%1.6322.1
Inferno1675%1.3418.6
Dust21457%1.1517.6
Anubis1250%0.8613.4
Ancient956%1.2418.8
Nuke333%1.2214.0
Vertigo1100%0.8016.0
Overpass10%0.214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
556msReaction time
48.6%T opening success
58.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
10.08HE damage / grenade
11.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–9-0.029%4 Nov →
inferno7–90.0516%3 Nov →
inferno5–130.0526%31 Oct →
cache16–130.1328%29 Oct →
mirage16–130.1016%29 Oct →
mirage5–130.0121%24 Oct →
nuke10–130.0316%22 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0223%22 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0223%19 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0517%16 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0025%16 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0426%15 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0521%14 Oct →
anubis15–150.0813%14 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0113%13 Oct →
inferno9–130.0118%9 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0317%8 Oct →
ancient16–120.029%8 Oct →
inferno13–80.0317%7 Oct →
nuke13–60.0017%7 Oct →
mirage19–150.0217%3 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0716%2 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0119%1 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0616%1 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0428%29 Sept →
mirage9–130.0024%26 Sept →
ancient16–140.1021%26 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0113%26 Sept →
mirage13–160.0230%23 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0218%21 Sept →
nuke13–40.0121%16 Sept →
inferno7–130.0122%14 Sept →
mirage9–130.0911%9 Sept →
dust213–70.0224%9 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0818%7 Sept →
inferno13–90.0312%6 Sept →
inferno6–130.0625%4 Sept →
dust26–13-0.074%3 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0022%2 Sept →
ancient13–90.0218%2 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0118%30 Aug →
inferno15–150.0919%26 Aug →
dust213–110.0618%24 Aug →
mirage15–150.0326%23 Aug →
cache15–150.0316%23 Aug →
dust213–80.0616%23 Aug →
ancient13–60.1017%23 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0221%22 Aug →
mirage5–130.0326%21 Aug →
mirage13–80.0310%21 Aug →
anubis13–40.1315%21 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0017%18 Aug →
inferno13–90.0422%17 Aug →
dust213–50.0333%17 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0518%16 Aug →
inferno13–10.0616%15 Aug →
inferno13–110.0723%15 Aug →
ancient13–2-0.0312%15 Aug →
mirage13–20.2422%15 Aug →
inferno13–80.0114%13 Aug →
inferno13–160.1326%12 Aug →
mirage7–130.0430%11 Aug →
ancient16–130.0820%11 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0919%9 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0219%8 Aug →
cache9–130.0412%8 Aug →
mirage16–130.1219%8 Aug →
mirage13–160.0214%8 Aug →
dust213–60.0530%8 Aug →
mirage13–100.0922%8 Aug →
ancient15–150.0417%5 Aug →
anubis13–90.0620%4 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0712%4 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0119%3 Aug →
ancient13–40.0723%3 Aug →
dust213–110.1324%2 Aug →
inferno8–130.0033%2 Aug →
inferno13–100.0522%2 Aug →
ancient13–100.0416%2 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0314%1 Aug →
mirage16–120.0824%1 Aug →
dust213–40.0328%1 Aug →
anubis10–130.0222%31 Jul →
mirage13–90.1016%31 Jul →
dust213–90.1020%31 Jul →
inferno12–16-0.0018%29 Jul →
inferno13–50.1017%29 Jul →
cache13–70.1034%29 Jul →
inferno16–12-0.0227%21 Jul →
dust213–70.0122%16 Jul →
anubis10–130.0518%16 Jul →
anubis11–130.0424%15 Jul →
nuke13–160.1720%14 Jul →
dust213–100.1527%14 Jul →
dust21–13-0.100%12 Jul →
inferno9–130.0721%12 Jul →
mirage13–100.0426%12 Jul →
ancient12–160.0427%11 Jul →
mirage13–80.1224%11 Jul →
anubis16–140.0320%11 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.