tasm

tasm — CS2 Stats

US76561199047931619[U:1:1087665891]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,341Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,360Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPassive Rifler
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning40
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateLWLLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression3.3
Utility6.1
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.0
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time547ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy25.8%−4.6%
first ⅓ avg 30.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 13–7
131Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA28171161%0.01
dust2B1910953%0.00
infernoC1971237%0.01
anubisA116555%0.02
ancientC104640%0.00
nukeS64267%0.02
cache31233%-0.03
overpass32167%-0.02
train1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

160,566Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
4,843Matches
50.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
52.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
17.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
13,554MVPs
4,360Hours (in match)
5,427Bombs planted
1,615Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4762,114
AWP26,402
FAMAS3,251
Knife2,879
SSG 081,222

Lifetime map wins

11,252dust2
10,475inferno
4,199vertigo
3,336nuke
2,051train
81cbble
62office
28lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,111Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
80.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18354%1.1317.6
Dust216047%1.2218.0
Ancient9956%1.1718.2
Anubis8548%1.0516.6
Inferno8445%1.1817.6
Nuke3746%0.9714.9
Overpass944%1.0614.8
Cache944%0.8712.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.4%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
564msReaction time
19.3%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
8.07HE damage / grenade
9.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.2759% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–130.0926%11 Aug
inferno16–140.0231%24 Jul
mirage7–130.0630%24 Jul
inferno11–130.0630%24 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0328%24 Jul
cache11–13-0.0519%24 Jul
anubis1–130.1020%23 Jul
anubis13–70.0915%22 Jul
mirage13–90.0933%21 Jul
dust213–80.0127%21 Jul
mirage9–00.000%21 Jul
mirage13–50.1333%21 Jul
ancient7–3-0.0433%20 Jul
mirage13–50.0418%20 Jul
mirage13–60.0816%18 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0250%12 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0840%9 Jul
mirage0–13-0.1311%6 Jul
cache8–13-0.0332%6 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0425%6 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0043%6 Jul
inferno0–13-0.0827%6 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0220%5 Jul
dust28–130.0033%4 Jul
overpass8–130.0011%1 Jul
cache13–9-0.0126%1 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0326%1 Jul
inferno13–50.0227%1 Jul
mirage16–19-0.0124%28 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0038%28 Jun
anubis13–100.018%28 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0922%28 Jun
ancient11–130.0429%28 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0617%28 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0917%28 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0324%27 Jun
anubis13–70.0223%27 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0223%27 Jun
inferno19–160.0629%27 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0131%27 Jun
ancient7–130.0327%15 Jun
dust24–13-0.0413%8 Jun
ancient22–20-0.0021%8 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0216%6 Jun
ancient13–10.0629%5 Jun
anubis13–30.0020%5 Jun
mirage19–160.0215%26 May
inferno13–50.1231%22 May
anubis11–13-0.0324%17 May
inferno13–1-0.056%17 May
mirage13–70.0318%12 May
mirage11–130.0214%12 May
dust24–13-0.0326%7 May
anubis4–13-0.0325%4 May
dust213–80.0620%4 May
dust210–13-0.0316%2 May
dust213–110.0534%2 May
mirage13–80.0316%26 Apr
mirage16–12-0.0419%23 Apr
mirage13–30.0413%23 Apr
nuke16–13-0.0324%17 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0336%28 Mar
dust213–70.0127%25 Mar
mirage2–7-0.0113%21 Mar
inferno5–130.0325%11 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0131%2 Mar
mirage13–30.1228%2 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0233%17 Feb
inferno10–130.0627%16 Feb
dust21–13-0.0615%16 Feb
mirage13–2-0.0439%16 Feb
dust25–130.0325%14 Feb
mirage8–130.0733%14 Feb
dust213–110.0725%14 Feb
inferno15–150.0130%14 Feb
dust213–10-0.0127%14 Feb
dust213–30.0714%9 Feb
dust211–2-0.0138%6 Feb
inferno13–110.0933%6 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0134%25 Jan
dust213–2-0.0142%25 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0116%19 Jan
overpass13–6-0.0326%19 Jan
inferno5–100.0526%19 Jan
dust213–8-0.0338%19 Jan
dust214–16-0.070%19 Jan
mirage13–40.0339%19 Jan
train15–15-0.0227%12 Jan
anubis13–70.0934%11 Jan
mirage3–6-0.0418%11 Jan
dust28–13-0.0225%10 Jan
nuke13–70.1431%10 Jan
mirage13–160.0235%10 Jan
inferno10–130.0221%7 Jan
overpass13–5-0.0327%22 Dec
nuke13–80.1125%22 Dec
mirage0–20.0267%22 Dec
nuke3–130.0569%21 Dec
ancient6–130.0325%17 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0036%17 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →