Paparonalds

Paparonalds — CS2 Stats

SZ76561199046183190[U:1:1085917462]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,533Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,587Hours in CS45Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,156 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate40.2%50.9%
Shot accuracy10.8%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.121.09
Match win rate44.1%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPaparonaldsFACEITLevel 10 · 2,156 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning53
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56–43–1Last 10056%Win rateWWLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 397ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 406ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 419ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.6
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.3
Utility4.6
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time436ms−87ms
first ⅓ avg 523ms → last ⅓ avg 436ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%−3.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–2 · debris, 5 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · cache, 14 Aug →
297msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · anubis, 9 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · boulder, 9 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
W2Current streak
14–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 77% over 13infernoWeakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisS1812–667%0.01
dust2A149–564%0.03
nukeS1310–377%0.04
mirageB126–650%-0.00
infernoD122–1017%0.00
ancientB115–645%-0.02
cacheA85–363%0.03
officeC52–340%0.06
fachwerk—10–10%0.04
eldorado—11–0100%0.23
debris—11–0100%0.26
vertigo—10–10%-0.10
shelter—11–0100%0.11
boulder—11–0100%0.12
overpass—11–0100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

137,108Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players
6,924Matches
44.1%Match win rate
40.2%Headshot %
10.8%Shot accuracy
17,681MVPs
2,849Hours (in match)
7,983Bombs planted
1,600Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,879
AWP15,958
FAMAS5,000
MP93,267
Knife3,077

Lifetime map wins

11,188nuke
9,417inferno
6,479dust2
3,967vertigo
1,665train
1,176office
427cbble
297lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,265Matches
49%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
80.2ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage27648%1.0915.5
Dust226944%1.1214.6
Nuke24755%1.2617.5
Ancient24149%1.0815.0
Anubis24153%1.1615.7
Inferno22849%1.2015.9
Overpass7649%1.1215.6
Train5560%1.2117.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
70.6%Counter-strafing
6.3°Preaim
438msReaction time
31.2%T opening success
47.6%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
10.80HE damage / grenade
4.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1759% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.1509% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–60.0217%29 Oct →
dust213–20.0815%28 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.008%28 Oct →
anubis20–22-0.0112%24 Oct →
ancient13–110.0015%24 Oct →
mirage16–130.0515%23 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.077%23 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0313%23 Oct →
anubis13–30.0813%23 Oct →
inferno13–110.0317%22 Oct →
nuke13–60.117%21 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0316%21 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0413%19 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0113%19 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0216%16 Oct →
inferno8–130.035%16 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0417%16 Oct →
cache13–90.0214%16 Oct →
anubis13–80.018%16 Oct →
dust25–130.0721%16 Oct →
mirage13–110.0214%14 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0319%14 Oct →
dust216–140.0414%12 Oct →
anubis13–70.0815%12 Oct →
dust213–110.0327%10 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0213%10 Oct →
anubis13–80.0421%10 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0221%10 Oct →
nuke14–160.0315%7 Oct →
cache13–70.074%7 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0217%3 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0115%3 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.058%27 Sept →
nuke13–90.108%26 Sept →
nuke13–30.0614%24 Sept →
cache22–190.048%20 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0612%18 Sept →
dust27–130.0112%13 Sept →
mirage13–100.0015%11 Sept →
anubis13–100.0111%9 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.048%9 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.1030%7 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.055%6 Sept →
nuke13–100.0223%5 Sept →
fachwerk10–130.0421%5 Sept →
eldorado9–40.2322%5 Sept →
debris9–20.2614%5 Sept →
nuke2–9-0.106%5 Sept →
nuke8–130.0817%3 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0218%28 Aug →
inferno11–130.0220%18 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0124%14 Aug →
cache6–130.1035%14 Aug →
anubis13–70.0218%13 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0320%9 Aug →
inferno13–160.0418%8 Aug →
vertigo8–13-0.1030%7 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0115%7 Aug →
ancient13–110.0217%7 Aug →
cache10–130.0117%5 Aug →
nuke13–70.0527%5 Aug →
cache17–190.0115%5 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0015%1 Aug →
anubis13–40.0811%31 Jul →
office0–6-0.0720%29 Jul →
inferno11–130.0015%29 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.069%29 Jul →
inferno7–130.0312%29 Jul →
nuke13–60.0313%25 Jul →
anubis13–110.0116%20 Jul →
dust28–130.0817%18 Jul →
dust213–110.0318%17 Jul →
inferno16–130.0320%17 Jul →
nuke13–110.0131%17 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0419%16 Jul →
dust29–130.0310%16 Jul →
inferno11–130.0122%16 Jul →
mirage13–80.1318%9 Jul →
shelter13–100.1124%9 Jul →
boulder13–10.1223%9 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0820%9 Jul →
nuke13–20.1423%9 Jul →
cache13–7-0.048%5 Jul →
dust213–70.1131%2 Jul →
nuke13–90.019%29 Jun →
cache13–80.0229%28 Jun →
dust213–7-0.026%23 Jun →
office11–130.0416%22 Jun →
office13–50.2021%21 Jun →
anubis8–130.0120%18 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0116%14 Jun →
office12–120.0020%13 Jun →
dust213–110.0311%12 Jun →
office13–30.1320%10 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0413%10 Jun →
overpass13–20.1015%5 Jun →
mirage13–80.008%19 May →
anubis13–40.0317%17 May →
mirage7–13-0.0215%15 May →
inferno11–130.0217%15 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.