❤ PANDAFREAKS Elisio ❤

❤ PANDAFREAKS Elisio ❤ — CS2 Stats

76561199074285139[U:1:1114019411]Steam profile ↗

759Tracked matches67%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,330Blue band · top ~31.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#34304 of 54832 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 959 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

14,330Peak Premier on CSDB
959Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 959
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 92 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 14,330
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 670 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG❤ PANDAFREAKS Elisio ❤FACEITLevel 8 · 959 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER14,330 · Blue bandPEAK ELO959csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning42
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5050Last 10050%Win rateWWWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.6
Aggression4.0
Utility6.3
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.2
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time592ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — anubis 13–4
132Biggest win — anubis
7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 20ancientWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B22111150%-0.01
infernoA2012860%-0.01
mirageC2081240%-0.01
anubisC1881044%-0.01
nukeA95456%-0.01
ancientC83538%0.00
cache330100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

725Matches
51%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
77.6ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20251%1.0316.1
Dust216049%0.9214.8
Inferno12950%0.9815.9
Ancient8754%0.9315.1
Anubis7146%0.9314.4
Nuke4455%0.9415.8
Overpass1338%0.8613.1
Cache1275%1.1217.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
591msReaction time
31.2%T opening success
34.5%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
7.42HE damage / grenade
20.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.2224% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–9-0.0519%30 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0527%30 Aug
cache13–9-0.0722%30 Aug
anubis0–13-0.073%30 Aug
cache13–100.0922%30 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0426%30 Aug
dust213–7-0.019%29 Aug
mirage13–40.0130%29 Aug
dust219–15-0.0617%29 Aug
ancient22–20-0.0219%29 Aug
mirage13–110.0120%29 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0127%29 Aug
dust210–130.0219%28 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0811%27 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0439%27 Aug
anubis13–20.0418%26 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0619%26 Aug
inferno13–80.0217%26 Aug
nuke13–60.0231%26 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0528%25 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0118%24 Aug
dust26–13-0.047%23 Aug
mirage13–40.0723%23 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0118%23 Aug
cache13–100.0235%23 Aug
dust213–30.0625%23 Aug
inferno13–100.0331%23 Aug
mirage13–90.0136%23 Aug
dust213–70.0023%23 Aug
mirage7–13-0.037%22 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0519%22 Aug
anubis14–160.0132%21 Aug
dust213–11-0.0424%21 Aug
dust213–9-0.0218%21 Aug
dust213–8-0.0618%21 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0126%21 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0221%17 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0325%17 Aug
mirage13–90.0733%17 Aug
dust23–13-0.0822%16 Aug
anubis7–130.0625%13 Aug
nuke13–110.0120%12 Aug
dust213–6-0.0326%12 Aug
mirage9–130.0317%12 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0016%12 Aug
dust210–13-0.0322%12 Aug
anubis11–130.0219%12 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0230%10 Aug
nuke13–20.0250%10 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0121%10 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0314%10 Aug
dust216–13-0.0246%7 Aug
dust25–13-0.0623%7 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0711%6 Aug
inferno13–110.0023%5 Aug
nuke16–130.0318%4 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0719%4 Aug
mirage8–13-0.088%4 Aug
mirage9–13-0.056%3 Aug
dust22–13-0.0616%3 Aug
ancient2–50.0644%2 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0524%1 Aug
dust28–13-0.0417%1 Aug
mirage3–130.0026%1 Aug
anubis13–16-0.180%1 Aug
nuke14–160.0022%31 Jul
mirage13–70.0623%31 Jul
anubis13–110.0926%31 Jul
dust213–60.1126%31 Jul
anubis13–40.159%30 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0527%30 Jul
inferno16–120.0024%30 Jul
mirage13–30.0624%30 Jul
dust211–130.0218%30 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0011%29 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0215%29 Jul
dust214–16-0.0319%28 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0218%28 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0212%27 Jul
dust25–13-0.0224%26 Jul
inferno9–130.0411%26 Jul
nuke6–13-0.059%26 Jul
inferno11–3-0.0150%26 Jul
anubis13–11-0.042%23 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0327%23 Jul
dust29–130.0325%22 Jul
mirage1–13-0.114%22 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0121%22 Jul
ancient8–130.0313%22 Jul
dust213–30.0826%22 Jul
ancient20–220.0518%22 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0117%22 Jul
inferno13–80.028%22 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0615%21 Jul
anubis13–70.0024%21 Jul
inferno13–30.0626%21 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0126%21 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0327%20 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0330%20 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0326%20 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →