Boroshy

Boroshy — CS2 Stats

CN76561199044697282[U:1:1084431554]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

900Tracked matches37%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,957Hours in CS86Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating6,756Light Blue band · top ~70.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2 · 715 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 6,756 -290 4 Sept – 11 Oct · 28 days played
5,9049,404peak 9,4044 Sept11 Oct
9,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
715Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-09-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 715
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 36 to go
  • Reached: Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,648 below peak (9,404)
  • -1,421 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 3,244 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,923), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate46.8%41.3%41.8%above
Shot accuracy0.4%12.7%12.2%11.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.770.950.980.21 short
Match win rate34.3%42.6%43.3%9.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBoroshyFACEITLevel 2 · 715 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER6,756 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO715csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning58
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40–60Last 10040%Win rateLLWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 678ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 677ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 671ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility4.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch2.0

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 650ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.8
Utility4.4
Mechanics9.2
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time656ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 650ms → last ⅓ avg 656ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 25 Sept →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · inferno, 9 Oct →
469msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · anubis, 4 Oct →
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 50% over 16mirageWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB199–1047%-0.02
nukeB168–850%-0.00
dust2C166–1038%-0.01
ancientC166–1038%-0.01
anubisC135–838%-0.02
cacheC104–640%-0.03
mirageD102–820%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,857Lifetime kills
0.77K/D
2,330Matches
34.3%Match win rate
46.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 2 players
0.4%Shot accuracy
3,761MVPs
784Hours (in match)
1,659Bombs planted
228Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,100nuke
2,863dust2
2,105inferno
1,619vertigo
186office
102train
26ar_shoots
24ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

183Matches
48%Win rate
0.74Avg K/D
72.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4745%0.7513.1
Nuke3161%0.7412.3
Dust22955%0.7412.3
Inferno2540%0.7211.5
Anubis2040%0.7813.3
Ancient1741%0.6812.6
Vertigo944%0.9012.0
Train450%0.578.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
28.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
91.4%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
650msReaction time
56.5%T opening success
44.4%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
8.29HE damage / grenade
7.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno1–13-0.0612%11 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0224%11 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0537%11 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.1124%11 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0419%10 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0513%10 Oct →
inferno11–130.0041%9 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0338%8 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0124%8 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0024%8 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0331%7 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0813%7 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0329%6 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0726%6 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0820%5 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0530%5 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0622%4 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0714%4 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0417%4 Oct →
anubis13–100.0114%4 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.039%4 Oct →
ancient13–100.0221%4 Oct →
nuke11–130.0023%3 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.046%3 Oct →
dust211–130.0130%3 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0014%3 Oct →
nuke6–130.0120%3 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0423%3 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0421%3 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0514%2 Oct →
dust213–90.0924%2 Oct →
mirage10–130.0114%2 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0318%2 Oct →
mirage3–130.0423%2 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0612%2 Oct →
ancient6–130.0525%1 Oct →
dust211–130.0420%30 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.084%30 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0519%30 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0427%29 Sept →
dust210–20.0029%29 Sept →
inferno5–130.0215%29 Sept →
nuke13–110.0417%29 Sept →
dust213–100.0222%29 Sept →
nuke13–30.0514%27 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0416%26 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0219%26 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0218%25 Sept →
nuke13–60.1616%25 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0422%25 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0524%25 Sept →
dust211–130.0623%25 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0111%25 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0022%25 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0419%24 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0913%24 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0413%24 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0924%24 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0616%24 Sept →
inferno7–130.0534%22 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0615%21 Sept →
dust212–6-0.0813%21 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0313%21 Sept →
dust27–13-0.1011%21 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0019%21 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0218%21 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0320%20 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0228%20 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0114%20 Sept →
ancient13–80.0223%20 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0221%20 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0320%19 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0516%18 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0117%12 Sept →
anubis13–80.0117%12 Sept →
cache1–130.0027%12 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.068%11 Sept →
inferno13–90.0524%11 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0116%7 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0220%7 Sept →
ancient13–80.0212%7 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0825%7 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0716%7 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0113%7 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0327%6 Sept →
mirage11–130.0326%6 Sept →
ancient12–160.0316%6 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0522%6 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0227%5 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0028%5 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0116%5 Sept →
inferno13–110.0121%5 Sept →
dust211–130.0116%5 Sept →
anubis9–130.0520%4 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0012%4 Sept →
dust28–130.0722%4 Sept →
inferno13–60.0820%4 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0218%4 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0124%4 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0122%3 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.