PavelKyrtsow

PavelKyrtsow — CS2 Stats

FI76561199041993519[U:1:1081727791]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,475Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,533Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating17,043Purple band · top ~20.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,551 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 17,043 → 17,043
0Faceit ELO · 1,551 → 1,551
+54Tracked matches · now 1,475
+3.3ppWin rate · 53.3% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 12 Apr 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,043 +1,328 12 Apr4 Sept · 15 days played
15,59617,300peak 17,30012 Apr4 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,551 +0 1 Sept4 Sept · 3 observations
1,5511,551peak 1,5511 Sept4 Sept
17,300Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,551Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2025-04-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,551
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 200 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 257 below peak (17,300)
  • +288 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,957 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,764), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate42.8%44.8%45.7%3.0% short
Shot accuracy17.5%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.911.041.050.14 short
Match win rate43.3%45.2%45.7%2.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPavelKyrtsowFACEITLevel 6 · 1,551 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,043 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,551csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning46
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50491Last 10050%Win rateWWLWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim5.6
Utility4.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.6
Utility4.0
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time610ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms
Headshot accuracy14.7%−5.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 31 May
67%Best headshot accuracy · 0–6 · ancient, 10 Aug
422msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 22 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 8 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 18dust2Weakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB1991047%-0.03
mirageS1812667%0.01
nukeB168850%-0.01
anubisB136746%-0.03
infernoC135838%-0.03
dust2C114736%-0.00
cacheA85363%-0.01
vertigo110100%-0.05
poseidon1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

75,538Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
3,428Matches
43.3%Match win rate
42.8%Headshot %
17.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
9,757MVPs
1,533Hours (in match)
2,994Bombs planted
921Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,577
AWP14,529
MP92,591
P2501,732
Knife1,429

Lifetime map wins

6,361inferno
4,541train
4,285nuke
3,395dust2
3,241vertigo
179cbble
59lake
26italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,359Matches
50%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
74.2ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient7356%0.9814.5
Mirage6546%0.9214.3
Anubis6448%0.9715.4
Nuke4358%0.8713.4
Inferno3250%0.8614.0
Dust23050%1.0217.1
Vertigo2658%0.7713.0
Cache1942%0.8612.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.6%Spray accuracy
73.2%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
601msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
54.4%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
9.70HE damage / grenade
4.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1041% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3984 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7573% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0414%10 Sept
nuke13–110.0417%9 Sept
mirage17–19-0.0111%5 Sept
ancient13–60.006%2 Sept
vertigo13–10-0.059%1 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0510%31 Aug
anubis13–6-0.055%27 Aug
mirage13–100.0421%27 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0017%25 Aug
nuke13–11-0.077%23 Aug
dust211–13-0.0318%23 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0312%22 Aug
anubis16–120.0218%21 Aug
dust24–130.0124%19 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0525%19 Aug
nuke4–13-0.125%18 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0617%18 Aug
inferno9–13-0.086%17 Aug
anubis13–4-0.040%16 Aug
anubis13–100.0123%16 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0012%16 Aug
cache6–13-0.089%16 Aug
poseidon7–9-0.0714%16 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0217%16 Aug
nuke13–30.1117%16 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0519%16 Aug
cache6–13-0.0211%16 Aug
mirage13–40.0718%16 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0820%15 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0116%15 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0115%15 Aug
dust211–13-0.0321%15 Aug
cache13–40.0031%13 Aug
ancient3–0-0.130%13 Aug
dust210–13-0.0318%13 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0118%13 Aug
cache13–20.0423%13 Aug
cache13–5-0.0033%11 Aug
ancient0–6-0.0167%10 Aug
mirage13–80.1038%10 Aug
nuke13–50.0018%10 Aug
mirage13–10.1021%10 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0614%10 Aug
ancient13–11-0.108%9 Aug
ancient6–13-0.097%9 Aug
mirage13–90.0111%9 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0619%9 Aug
ancient3–13-0.022%9 Aug
cache16–120.0117%9 Aug
nuke4–130.0018%9 Aug
nuke1–7-0.0711%9 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0419%9 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0814%9 Aug
nuke13–70.0312%8 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0523%8 Aug
ancient13–00.0933%8 Aug
cache10–13-0.0114%7 Aug
dust213–7-0.0811%7 Aug
ancient9–130.0119%6 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0313%6 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0117%6 Aug
inferno15–150.0315%19 Jul
mirage11–130.0222%19 Jul
cache13–11-0.0221%19 Jul
ancient9–130.0211%15 Jul
dust213–30.0829%21 Jun
dust211–13-0.0013%19 Jun
dust23–13-0.0521%19 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0719%19 Jun
mirage13–40.0429%19 Jun
dust213–100.1019%31 May
ancient13–70.1219%31 May
ancient6–13-0.0615%31 May
mirage13–7-0.0713%29 May
nuke11–130.0422%29 May
dust213–90.0015%29 May
nuke13–160.0413%29 May
anubis8–13-0.0922%1 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0428%31 Jan
nuke3–9-0.0424%18 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0616%16 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0311%11 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0823%7 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0221%7 Jun
inferno1–13-0.067%10 May
inferno13–5-0.0628%10 May
mirage13–60.0630%10 May
nuke3–13-0.1216%10 May
nuke13–40.0115%9 May
ancient13–7-0.0718%9 May
dust216–190.0021%9 May
mirage11–13-0.1126%9 May
inferno13–40.0029%8 May
inferno16–130.0621%8 May
ancient8–13-0.0421%14 Apr
inferno13–4-0.028%13 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0113%12 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0222%12 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0432%12 Apr
anubis9–130.0117%12 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →