antipathy

antipathy — CS2 Stats

76561199037435019[U:1:1077169291]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

557Tracked matches32%Win rate2023Tracked since
676Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,664Blue band · top ~40.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 956 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,664 +440 11 Aug – 20 Sept · 10 days played
12,15213,963peak 13,96311 Aug20 Sept
14,314Peak Premier in tracked matches
956Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 956
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 95 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,299 below peak (13,963)
  • +126 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,336 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,870), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate58.5%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy4.8%12.7%13.0%8.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.061.051.06meets
Match win rate47.2%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGantipathyFACEITLevel 7 · 956 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER12,664 · Blue bandPEAK ELO956csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning66
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateLLLWWTWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.8
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.6
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time521ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 528ms → last ⅓ avg 521ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–0 · nuke, 23 Aug →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · nuke, 23 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 6 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 11 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
9–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3618–1850%0.04
dust2C229–1341%0.03
infernoC145–936%0.02
nukeS96–367%0.05
ancientS96–367%0.02
anubisD62–433%0.05
cache—33–0100%0.04
vertigo—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,831Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
949Matches
47.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
58.5%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 7 players
4.8%Shot accuracy
2,362MVPs
330Hours (in match)
749Bombs planted
203Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,720nuke
1,270dust2
800inferno
114vertigo
42train
17office
6italy
3assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

116Matches
53%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
90.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
37%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3951%1.3920.0
Dust23447%1.3016.7
Anubis1443%1.2421.4
Inferno1145%1.3019.2
Ancient1080%1.3217.8
Nuke450%1.2619.8
Cache4100%1.1316.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
79.1%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
520msReaction time
55.6%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
11.93HE damage / grenade
9.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0018%25 Sept →
inferno8–130.0119%20 Sept →
inferno6–90.0219%20 Sept →
nuke13–100.0628%18 Sept →
mirage13–80.1920%18 Sept →
mirage15–150.0814%18 Sept →
mirage13–80.1120%18 Sept →
vertigo9–20.0232%16 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0922%16 Sept →
inferno9–6-0.0121%16 Sept →
nuke9–40.0431%16 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0414%12 Sept →
nuke13–80.0420%11 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0414%11 Sept →
dust25–130.0329%11 Sept →
dust213–90.0517%11 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.039%11 Sept →
anubis12–120.1018%11 Sept →
mirage8–130.0712%10 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0226%10 Sept →
dust27–130.0216%6 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0316%6 Sept →
mirage13–50.1014%6 Sept →
inferno11–130.0314%6 Sept →
mirage6–130.054%6 Sept →
mirage11–130.0613%6 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0321%5 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0321%5 Sept →
inferno7–130.0510%5 Sept →
ancient2–6-0.0520%5 Sept →
dust29–10.0823%5 Sept →
mirage3–130.0814%5 Sept →
anubis28–310.0116%5 Sept →
dust210–130.0417%5 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0418%5 Sept →
mirage13–50.1120%5 Sept →
anubis10–130.0714%4 Sept →
mirage13–40.1122%4 Sept →
mirage25–220.0211%4 Sept →
ancient13–30.1115%4 Sept →
mirage10–130.0416%4 Sept →
ancient13–100.0119%4 Sept →
nuke4–130.0413%2 Sept →
mirage13–90.0114%2 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0315%2 Sept →
anubis16–12-0.0115%2 Sept →
inferno11–130.0324%2 Sept →
dust216–130.0223%1 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0134%1 Sept →
nuke11–130.0318%1 Sept →
dust213–40.1216%1 Sept →
cache13–70.0415%31 Aug →
mirage13–40.1125%31 Aug →
anubis13–80.1219%31 Aug →
mirage11–130.026%30 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0217%30 Aug →
mirage13–70.0417%29 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0031%29 Aug →
cache13–90.0816%29 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.009%28 Aug →
cache13–110.0012%28 Aug →
dust213–20.1114%28 Aug →
inferno13–40.0115%28 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0016%26 Aug →
ancient13–110.0520%26 Aug →
nuke9–70.0520%23 Aug →
nuke9–00.2536%23 Aug →
inferno4–90.0124%23 Aug →
mirage14–160.0011%23 Aug →
dust213–20.0431%23 Aug →
mirage13–50.1011%23 Aug →
mirage9–130.0115%23 Aug →
nuke9–7-0.0133%18 Aug →
dust25–13-0.038%18 Aug →
dust213–40.1425%18 Aug →
dust29–130.0321%17 Aug →
dust21–13-0.055%17 Aug →
inferno16–140.0117%17 Aug →
mirage19–15-0.0117%16 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0520%16 Aug →
mirage14–160.0512%16 Aug →
mirage13–30.0521%16 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0231%16 Aug →
mirage13–110.0715%16 Aug →
inferno9–130.0315%16 Aug →
inferno13–40.0329%14 Aug →
dust213–60.0525%14 Aug →
mirage13–160.0314%14 Aug →
mirage16–120.0227%14 Aug →
ancient3–130.0513%13 Aug →
dust213–160.0328%13 Aug →
dust214–160.0424%11 Aug →
mirage1–130.0324%11 Aug →
mirage8–130.0115%11 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0210%11 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0115%10 Aug →
ancient13–60.1013%10 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0416%10 Aug →
inferno13–100.1314%10 Aug →
anubis17–190.0111%9 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.