✪ Reprise

✪ Reprise — CS2 Stats

US76561199034231372[U:1:1073965644]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

603Tracked matches60%Win rate2024Tracked since
710Hours in CS40Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,092 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,673 +5,769 4 Jan – 12 Mar · 4 days played
3,9049,774peak 9,7744 Jan12 Mar
9,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,092Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-01-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,092
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 109 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,879), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate60.4%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy0.6%12.4%12.7%12.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.761.031.05above
Match win rate48.0%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ RepriseFACEITLevel 6 · 1,092 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,092csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning50
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateWLLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · −50ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility4.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch1.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.0
Utility4.1
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact8.3

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time629ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 9–7 · poseidon, 27 Mar →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 27 Mar →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · overpass, 24 Feb →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 29 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC229–1341%0.01
ancientC197–1237%-0.00
anubisC156–940%-0.02
nukeA138–562%-0.02
infernoB105–550%-0.01
dust2S86–275%-0.01
cacheS64–267%-0.03
overpass—33–0100%-0.00
vertigo—10–10%-0.07
train—10–10%-0.06
sanctum—11–0100%0.12
poseidon—11–0100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

29,129Lifetime kills
1.76K/D · Top 5% of Level 6 players
898Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
60.4%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 6 players
0.6%Shot accuracy
2,878MVPs
378Hours (in match)
1,262Bombs planted
555Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,625dust2
1,112inferno
948nuke
809train
104vertigo
32cbble
2ar_shoots
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

210Matches
48%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
74.1ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5131%0.9014.2
Ancient4351%0.9614.3
Dust22941%0.9514.7
Nuke2458%1.0413.4
Anubis2348%1.1015.5
Inferno2157%1.2915.8
Train1173%1.2716.6
Cache450%1.0515.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
73.1%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
629msReaction time
28.9%T opening success
41.8%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
6.49HE damage / grenade
6.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.88% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–9-0.018%12 Oct →
vertigo4–9-0.0718%12 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.0311%12 Oct →
cache7–13-0.107%11 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.035%10 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0217%10 Oct →
nuke13–60.0319%10 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0812%9 Oct →
ancient9–130.0615%9 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0320%8 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0626%8 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0917%7 Oct →
cache16–12-0.0315%6 Oct →
nuke13–100.0014%5 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0517%4 Oct →
cache13–40.0313%4 Oct →
mirage7–130.0224%3 Oct →
dust28–130.0211%3 Oct →
mirage13–20.077%3 Oct →
mirage9–130.0622%3 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0116%3 Oct →
mirage13–00.078%29 Sept →
mirage7–130.0517%29 Sept →
mirage13–60.0321%29 Sept →
mirage13–110.0114%26 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0821%24 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0824%22 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.037%22 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0118%22 Sept →
nuke13–100.0422%22 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0917%20 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0011%20 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.056%19 Sept →
mirage13–90.0320%19 Sept →
ancient8–130.0127%19 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0418%19 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.126%18 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0224%18 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0814%18 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0316%16 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.048%13 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0214%13 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0021%13 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.026%13 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0113%11 Sept →
mirage13–90.0516%11 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0316%10 Sept →
mirage4–130.0327%9 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0712%9 Sept →
nuke13–40.0434%9 Sept →
anubis11–10.058%9 Sept →
train5–13-0.0611%9 Sept →
mirage12–30.0414%9 Sept →
sanctum9–40.1221%27 Mar →
poseidon9–70.1223%27 Mar →
dust213–40.0046%27 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.0522%23 Mar →
anubis4–13-0.0310%19 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.0217%19 Mar →
inferno4–13-0.0716%17 Mar →
inferno13–60.0125%16 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0113%16 Mar →
ancient13–9-0.0117%16 Mar →
mirage7–130.0020%12 Mar →
anubis9–130.0021%3 Mar →
anubis3–13-0.0512%3 Mar →
ancient13–60.0814%3 Mar →
inferno13–70.0616%26 Feb →
inferno13–8-0.0019%26 Feb →
overpass13–10-0.0227%24 Feb →
ancient14–160.0219%22 Feb →
inferno15–15-0.0116%22 Feb →
inferno8–130.0118%22 Feb →
nuke13–80.1118%21 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0320%21 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.1114%17 Feb →
mirage13–4-0.015%15 Feb →
inferno13–40.0120%15 Feb →
ancient13–90.045%15 Feb →
ancient11–13-0.0114%8 Feb →
overpass13–9-0.025%3 Feb →
inferno13–2-0.0224%3 Feb →
anubis16–140.0715%29 Jan →
ancient13–160.0417%29 Jan →
ancient13–50.0516%29 Jan →
nuke6–13-0.0521%26 Jan →
ancient13–90.0024%26 Jan →
anubis16–140.0213%26 Jan →
overpass13–50.0211%25 Jan →
ancient11–13-0.029%23 Jan →
anubis11–130.0718%23 Jan →
mirage10–13-0.0117%13 Jan →
anubis13–10-0.0131%13 Jan →
ancient10–13-0.0710%13 Jan →
ancient13–110.0313%11 Jan →
mirage13–16-0.0530%11 Jan →
anubis6–13-0.0512%11 Jan →
mirage8–130.0517%4 Jan →
mirage6–130.0213%4 Jan →
nuke13–7-0.0542%4 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.