Synetix — CS2 Stats

76561199033152420[U:1:1072886692]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

387Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since

376Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating21,505Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#63192 of 259154 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Jun 2026 (131 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

21,505Peak Premier in tracked matches

23Days played since 2026-05-21

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 21,505
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,495 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	47.2%	45.7%	46.8%	meets
Shot accuracy	13.2%	12.7%	13.0%	meets
Kill/death ratio	1.06	1.05	1.06	meets
Match win rate	54.3%	45.7%	46.3%	above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 8 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning43

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–30–14Last 10056%Win rateLWWWWTTWTT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.9pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

4–1 · 80% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 655ms

Last 10

5–1–4 · 50% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 658ms

Last 20

12–3–5 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 653ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.5

Utility5.6

Positioning4.3

Opening Duels1.1

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 662ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning4.3

Utility5.6

Mechanics8.7

Opening Duels1.6

Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time664ms+30ms

first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 664ms

Headshot accuracy21.0%+2.1%

first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.30Best match rating · 9–1 · vertigo, 24 May →

50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · inferno, 23 May →

430msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · alpine, 27 May →

13–1Biggest win · warden, 22 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak

3–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 7wardenWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	A	69	38–31	55%	-0.00
inferno	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.00
warden	D	6	2–4	33%	0.00
mirage	C	5	2–3	40%	0.02
alpine	C	5	2–3	40%	0.01
nuke	—	2	2–0	100%	0.09
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07
ancient	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
anubis	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.30
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.03
office	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

16,269Lifetime kills

1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players

941Matches

54.3%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 7 players

47.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players

13.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players

2,114MVPs

376Hours (in match)

858Bombs planted

223Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-474,873

M4A4 / M4A1-S3,364

Desert Eagle1,740

P2000 / USP-S1,099

AWP843

MP9681

Glock-18648

Galil AR522

FAMAS427

MAC-10370

Lifetime map wins

1,564inferno

502dust2

414vertigo

314nuke

308train

94office

25cbble

10bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

80Matches

59%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

83.5ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	21	52%	1.00	14.7
Inferno	12	75%	1.21	16.1
Anubis	11	55%	1.45	17.4
Cache	8	88%	1.51	20.1
Ancient	6	67%	1.12	17.8
Overpass	3	33%	1.10	14.7
Dust2	1	0%	1.00	17.0
Nuke	1	0%	0.43	6.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy

38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.2%Spray accuracy

89.3%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

662msReaction time

25.3%T opening success

42.7%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

4.1%Flash assists

10.36HE damage / grenade

8.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.3398% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
warden	8–13	-0.01	19%	6 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.02	17%	6 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.03	11%	6 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.03	19%	5 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.01	18%	5 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.02	24%	30 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.03	15%	30 Jun →
cache	13–10	-0.01	16%	28 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.04	23%	28 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.02	20%	25 Jun →
inferno	9–5	0.02	20%	23 Jun →
poseidon	9–6	0.07	21%	23 Jun →
nuke	13–5	-0.06	33%	23 Jun →
mirage	12–12	-0.02	28%	23 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.14	28%	23 Jun →
cache	13–7	-0.01	27%	23 Jun →
cache	13–7	-0.05	11%	23 Jun →
cache	5–13	-0.05	14%	23 Jun →
cache	8–13	0.07	17%	23 Jun →
warden	13–1	0.02	20%	22 Jun →
cache	5–0	-0.02	0%	22 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.05	31%	22 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.00	18%	21 Jun →
cache	8–13	-0.03	29%	21 Jun →
cache	13–7	-0.04	15%	21 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.00	20%	21 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.01	24%	21 Jun →
cache	13–4	0.08	27%	21 Jun →
cache	13–3	0.06	37%	21 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	11%	20 Jun →
cache	11–13	-0.08	11%	20 Jun →
cache	7–13	0.03	30%	20 Jun →
cache	7–3	-0.06	40%	20 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.07	23%	20 Jun →
cache	8–0	0.07	29%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	15%	18 Jun →
inferno	13–2	0.03	14%	18 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.02	19%	18 Jun →
cache	13–9	-0.01	10%	18 Jun →
cache	13–5	-0.02	25%	17 Jun →
cache	5–13	0.01	20%	17 Jun →
alpine	13–2	-0.01	10%	17 Jun →
warden	7–13	-0.07	17%	16 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.05	22%	16 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.05	20%	16 Jun →
cache	11–13	0.01	28%	16 Jun →
cache	13–9	-0.01	16%	15 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.02	27%	15 Jun →
cache	13–3	0.08	33%	15 Jun →
cache	13–11	-0.02	15%	14 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.01	24%	14 Jun →
cache	0–13	-0.06	13%	29 May →
cache	9–13	-0.04	42%	28 May →
cache	5–6	0.04	22%	28 May →
cache	11–13	-0.00	19%	28 May →
cache	12–12	0.08	19%	27 May →
cache	10–13	-0.05	20%	27 May →
cache	13–8	-0.05	24%	27 May →
alpine	8–13	0.02	46%	27 May →
inferno	13–4	0.02	19%	27 May →
cache	13–6	0.04	20%	27 May →
cache	11–13	0.02	18%	27 May →
cache	10–13	-0.03	6%	26 May →
cache	13–9	0.01	27%	26 May →
cache	12–12	-0.06	21%	26 May →
cache	13–2	0.07	21%	26 May →
ancient	13–9	0.06	25%	25 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	18%	25 May →
anubis	16–12	0.02	24%	25 May →
cache	13–8	-0.00	22%	25 May →
warden	13–10	0.05	10%	24 May →
inferno	8–8	-0.06	6%	24 May →
vertigo	9–1	0.30	21%	24 May →
cache	12–12	-0.02	22%	24 May →
cache	11–1	0.03	16%	24 May →
cache	13–6	-0.04	14%	24 May →
alpine	9–13	0.09	22%	24 May →
alpine	7–13	-0.03	31%	24 May →
cache	12–12	-0.01	19%	24 May →
cache	13–10	0.04	7%	23 May →
cache	13–2	0.10	18%	23 May →
cache	13–9	-0.02	23%	23 May →
overpass	9–4	-0.03	29%	23 May →
mirage	3–13	0.07	21%	23 May →
warden	3–13	-0.06	31%	23 May →
alpine	13–2	0.00	6%	23 May →
cache	5–13	-0.06	14%	23 May →
cache	13–8	0.03	11%	23 May →
nuke	9–2	0.25	11%	23 May →
cache	7–13	-0.04	22%	23 May →
inferno	2–9	-0.10	50%	23 May →
office	13–7	-0.02	37%	22 May →
cache	4–0	0.03	20%	22 May →
cache	13–5	0.07	10%	22 May →
cache	13–10	0.01	13%	22 May →
cache	13–4	-0.05	20%	22 May →
cache	4–13	-0.03	22%	22 May →
cache	13–10	0.02	9%	21 May →
cache	10–13	0.01	17%	21 May →
warden	12–12	0.09	9%	21 May →

Show all 100 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

CS2 Skin WordleName the skin from an extreme close-up Model AccuracyPrediction model accuracy stats Team Head-to-HeadCompare pro team stats

Learn & Explore

CS2 vs Rainbow Six SiegeDestructibility and operators vs pure utility CS2 Player Roles ExplainedEntry, support, AWPer, lurker, IGL CS2 Fixes & TroubleshootingStep-by-step fixes for every common CS2 problem