juonsah

juonsah — CS2 Stats

FI76561199029674875[U:1:1069409147]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,081Tracked matches60%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,348Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating15,928Purple band · top ~24.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 928 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,928 +808 28 Mar – 11 Oct · 24 days played
12,63917,242peak 17,24228 Mar11 Oct
17,590Peak Premier in tracked matches
928Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-03-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 928
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 123 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,314 below peak (17,242)
  • +1,317 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,072 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,649), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.1%43.7%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy13.7%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.851.021.030.18 short
Match win rate38.2%44.7%45.2%7.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjuonsahFACEITLevel 5 · 928 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,928 · Purple bandPEAK ELO928csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning50
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–46Last 10054%Win rateLLWWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · +27ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 615ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.8
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch2.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.0
Utility6.8
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time623ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–9 · inferno, 14 Jul →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · cache, 17 Jul →
438msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · nuke, 16 May →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 23 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 7ancientWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2113–862%-0.01
nukeA2012–860%-0.01
mirageB157–847%-0.01
ancientC145–936%-0.01
anubisS128–467%-0.02
dust2S75–271%0.02
cacheC73–443%-0.03
overpass—41–325%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,297Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
2,079Matches
38.2%Match win rate
44.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
3,138MVPs
692Hours (in match)
822Bombs planted
295Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,981inferno
2,207nuke
1,514dust2
1,125vertigo
515train
114lake
44cbble
26ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

70Matches
50%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
90.4ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1354%1.4321.5
Nuke1258%0.9215.4
Inferno1155%1.2417.4
Ancient617%0.7813.0
Anubis475%1.0819.0
Dust2367%1.2520.0
Cache250%0.829.0
Overpass10%1.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
41.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.9%Spray accuracy
88.9%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
612msReaction time
50.4%T opening success
44.5%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
10.7%Flash assists
9.67HE damage / grenade
13.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0511%11 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0121%11 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.079%11 Oct →
mirage13–100.0316%11 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0216%11 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0624%11 Oct →
mirage12–160.0215%11 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0220%11 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0112%11 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0120%10 Oct →
inferno11–130.0728%10 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0419%10 Oct →
dust213–110.0525%10 Oct →
dust213–70.0414%3 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0111%3 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0516%20 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0716%12 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0111%14 Aug →
ancient13–10.1022%14 Aug →
anubis10–130.0715%14 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0325%14 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.029%8 Aug →
cache5–13-0.1223%2 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0914%2 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.0319%19 Jul →
nuke13–60.0724%19 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0530%19 Jul →
inferno13–1-0.0432%19 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0323%17 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0023%17 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0416%17 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0235%17 Jul →
cache2–00.03100%17 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0420%16 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0640%16 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0230%15 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.0518%15 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0420%15 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0330%15 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0617%15 Jul →
mirage7–130.0117%15 Jul →
ancient13–30.0219%15 Jul →
inferno13–90.1523%14 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0215%14 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0715%13 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0130%13 Jul →
overpass7–130.0226%5 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0521%4 Jul →
anubis2–13-0.0714%4 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0225%3 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0119%3 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0221%3 Jul →
overpass7–130.0133%3 Jul →
nuke13–80.0146%20 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0218%20 Jun →
cache13–3-0.0023%20 Jun →
nuke3–13-0.0824%20 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0215%23 May →
nuke13–00.1023%23 May →
nuke9–130.0325%23 May →
nuke13–10-0.098%22 May →
mirage9–13-0.0917%22 May →
inferno13–11-0.0615%18 May →
mirage13–80.0124%17 May →
nuke3–13-0.0211%17 May →
overpass16–130.0117%17 May →
ancient5–13-0.0414%16 May →
inferno13–60.0123%16 May →
inferno13–8-0.0219%16 May →
nuke4–13-0.0425%16 May →
dust26–13-0.0619%16 May →
mirage7–130.0123%16 May →
ancient14–160.0421%16 May →
mirage10–13-0.0629%16 May →
mirage13–11-0.0524%16 May →
anubis13–2-0.0110%16 May →
overpass11–13-0.0716%15 May →
anubis13–11-0.0235%15 May →
nuke10–13-0.0328%15 May →
anubis13–60.019%2 May →
ancient4–13-0.026%2 May →
nuke13–10.0319%2 May →
inferno11–130.0219%1 May →
nuke13–110.0718%1 May →
anubis13–100.0124%1 May →
inferno13–8-0.0218%1 May →
ancient6–13-0.0419%1 May →
cache3–13-0.0412%30 Apr →
dust213–80.1027%30 Apr →
inferno9–130.0632%30 Apr →
mirage13–160.0927%19 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.018%18 Apr →
ancient13–7-0.013%18 Apr →
dust210–130.0231%5 Apr →
inferno13–10-0.0318%5 Apr →
ancient13–50.0127%29 Mar →
inferno13–5-0.0320%29 Mar →
ancient12–6-0.039%29 Mar →
nuke13–90.0531%29 Mar →
nuke13–6-0.0212%28 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.