kuternogi murzinho

kuternogi murzinho — CS2 Stats

76561199026616460[U:1:1066350732]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

173Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
274Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#86082 of 261542 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,475 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 +755 15 Apr – 21 Apr · 2 days played
19,24419,999peak 19,99915 Apr21 Apr
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,475Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2023-04-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,475
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 56 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate53.6%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy2.1%12.4%12.7%10.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.031.05above
Match win rate47.7%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkuternogi murzinhoFACEITLevel 6 · 1,475 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,475csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning69
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY34–34–5Last 7347%Win rateWWWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · −40ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 637ms

Last 20

  • 15–5 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Newest first, from the last 73 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility4.8
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 649ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.9
Utility4.8
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels5.9
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time657ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 679ms → last ⅓ avg 657ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%−5.0%
first ⅓ avg 28.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 73 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–4 · overpass, 30 Apr →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–6 · inferno, 9 Feb →
453msFastest reaction time · 9–6 · inferno, 9 Feb →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 21 Apr →

Across the last 73 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
W3Current streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 9nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2110–1148%-0.01
ancientC104–640%-0.01
anubisC94–544%0.01
infernoA95–456%-0.01
nukeC83–538%0.03
vertigoC52–340%0.07
dust2—42–250%-0.04
cache—31–233%0.02
overpass—32–167%0.10
edin—11–0100%0.00

Across the last 73 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

13,455Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
765Matches
47.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
53.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
2.1%Shot accuracy
2,237MVPs
274Hours (in match)
450Bombs planted
130Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

861nuke
848inferno
545dust2
418vertigo
93train
87cbble
7italy
7office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

381Matches
50%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
81.4ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12545%1.0617.1
Anubis7559%1.1518.5
Ancient4551%1.1416.7
Dust23949%1.0216.8
Nuke3842%1.1117.0
Inferno2948%1.0818.2
Cache944%1.2116.9
Vertigo667%1.2122.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
44.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.8%Spray accuracy
88.3%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
649msReaction time
57.9%T opening success
48.9%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
10.05HE damage / grenade
10.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–2-0.0317%17 Oct →
mirage13–100.017%17 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0120%17 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0123%15 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0628%14 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0924%14 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0230%14 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0113%14 Oct →
anubis16–120.0626%13 Oct →
mirage13–50.0620%13 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0715%12 Oct →
mirage16–130.0323%12 Oct →
ancient13–30.0414%12 Oct →
mirage13–110.0629%12 Oct →
inferno13–110.0525%11 Oct →
anubis13–20.0923%11 Oct →
cache13–70.1229%11 Oct →
ancient13–90.0124%11 Oct →
nuke13–80.1136%10 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0720%9 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0526%9 Oct →
nuke10–130.0234%9 Oct →
nuke13–40.1226%8 Oct →
overpass6–9-0.0338%23 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0520%22 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0527%19 Jun →
inferno13–16-0.0731%16 May →
cache12–120.0127%13 May →
nuke10–130.0922%9 May →
ancient5–13-0.0616%5 May →
anubis8–13-0.0017%5 May →
ancient11–130.0614%21 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0713%21 Apr →
mirage13–10.0122%21 Apr →
mirage13–2-0.0118%21 Apr →
ancient15–15-0.0128%21 Apr →
mirage16–12-0.0618%15 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.0318%14 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0324%10 Apr →
anubis13–40.0618%1 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0221%3 Mar →
ancient13–110.0215%27 Nov →
mirage14–160.0316%21 Nov →
nuke9–5-0.090%19 Nov →
dust213–6-0.0033%18 Nov →
vertigo9–40.1924%16 Nov →
dust23–13-0.0438%9 Feb →
inferno9–60.0050%9 Feb →
anubis19–170.0122%23 Jan →
mirage16–14-0.0520%19 Jan →
anubis13–16-0.0122%16 Jan →
nuke4–13-0.0847%5 Jan →
inferno16–140.0326%31 Dec →
edin13–80.0022%1 Dec →
mirage4–13-0.0228%29 Jul →
vertigo8–80.1432%19 May →
overpass9–40.2531%30 Apr →
vertigo6–9-0.0325%30 Apr →
mirage13–10.0847%29 Apr →
vertigo1–9-0.0832%12 Mar →
mirage0–13-0.1340%10 Mar →
vertigo9–20.1423%3 Mar →
nuke9–130.0725%28 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0443%27 Feb →
inferno12–120.1148%23 Feb →
mirage8–130.0031%21 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.0523%19 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0217%19 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0318%14 Feb →
mirage12–12-0.0421%8 Feb →
overpass16–110.0726%17 Apr →
dust29–16-0.0723%15 Apr →
inferno14–16-0.0119%14 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.