Joneeeeeez

Joneeeeeez — CS2 Stats

76561199024554665[U:1:1064288937]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

94Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,670Purple band · top ~21.8% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,670 +11,671 23 Nov – 30 Sept · 15 days played
4,99916,670peak 16,67023 Nov30 Sept
16,818Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2023-04-16

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 16,670
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,330 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJoneeeeeezPREMIER16,670 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning75
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–39–3Last 8349%Win rateLWWWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · −49ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 83 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility3.6
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels5.5

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning7.5
Utility3.6
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels7.8
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time556ms−100ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%−5.5%
first ⅓ avg 26.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 83 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 15 Sept →
80%Best headshot accuracy · 0–5 · ancient, 19 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · anubis, 30 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 27 Sept →

Across the last 83 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 56% over 9anubisWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB1910–953%0.00
mirageB147–750%0.01
dust2B136–746%0.03
anubisC125–742%0.01
cacheA95–456%0.05
ancientB84–450%0.01
nukeC73–443%0.00
dogtown—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 83 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.0%Spray accuracy
72.9%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
550msReaction time
63.5%T opening success
58.9%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
8.05HE damage / grenade
3.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.468 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–13-0.0224%30 Sept →
cache13–80.0923%30 Sept →
inferno13–100.0623%30 Sept →
anubis13–80.0329%30 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0724%30 Sept →
anubis13–90.0718%30 Sept →
nuke5–130.0232%29 Sept →
inferno13–30.0419%29 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0312%28 Sept →
inferno8–130.0224%28 Sept →
dust213–110.0330%28 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0720%28 Sept →
mirage13–10.0915%28 Sept →
anubis9–130.0725%28 Sept →
nuke12–20.0214%28 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0318%27 Sept →
nuke13–70.0819%27 Sept →
inferno13–80.0224%27 Sept →
ancient13–00.1419%27 Sept →
cache5–130.0226%27 Sept →
mirage13–40.0618%27 Sept →
anubis12–160.0319%27 Sept →
dust213–60.0815%27 Sept →
mirage13–160.0118%26 Sept →
anubis15–150.0821%26 Sept →
mirage8–130.0414%26 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0314%26 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0517%26 Sept →
ancient1–6-0.0715%25 Sept →
nuke13–40.0338%24 Sept →
ancient13–60.0318%24 Sept →
cache13–40.1124%24 Sept →
anubis13–30.0818%20 Sept →
ancient0–50.0880%19 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0222%16 Sept →
ancient13–40.0536%16 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0624%16 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0411%15 Sept →
cache13–10.0328%15 Sept →
dust28–130.0123%15 Sept →
cache1–8-0.0043%15 Sept →
dust213–40.1734%15 Sept →
dust213–30.0629%15 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0422%14 Sept →
cache13–10.1329%14 Sept →
dust22–80.0824%13 Sept →
inferno2–50.0118%13 Sept →
cache10–130.0222%12 Sept →
inferno9–130.0526%12 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0421%12 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0517%11 Sept →
dust28–130.0233%11 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0420%3 Sept →
dogtown9–00.0930%11 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0916%21 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0426%21 Jun →
anubis5–130.0126%17 Jun →
mirage0–10-0.0933%17 Jun →
inferno13–60.0234%15 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0225%30 Apr →
dust213–110.0127%30 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0040%30 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0419%25 Dec →
inferno13–80.0532%25 Nov →
nuke9–13-0.0128%25 Nov →
inferno13–110.0133%23 Nov →
mirage13–40.0235%28 Sept →
inferno9–70.0020%23 Jul →
mirage16–12-0.0125%4 May →
mirage4–90.0639%3 May →
mirage8–80.0721%26 Apr →
inferno1–9-0.1112%24 Apr →
inferno3–9-0.0227%23 Apr →
dust29–3-0.0229%23 Apr →
mirage9–7-0.0535%23 Apr →
inferno7–9-0.0611%22 Apr →
inferno9–10.0210%22 Apr →
cache7–9-0.0125%22 Apr →
inferno8–80.0423%18 Apr →
inferno9–5-0.0324%18 Apr →
mirage9–10.0923%17 Apr →
cache9–50.0824%17 Apr →
inferno7–90.0126%16 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.