Omkxr 危

Omkxr 危 — CS2 Stats

IN76561199022474620[U:1:1062208892]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,382Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,153Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating27,692Top 5% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2965 of 226605 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 21 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,692 +6,090 23 Jul10 Sept · 21 days played
21,60230,344peak 30,34423 Jul10 Sept
30,344Peak Premier in tracked matches
21Days played since 2026-07-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,652 below peak (30,344)
  • -1,857 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,308 to go
  • Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches15−4
Win rate0%40%−40pp
K/D0.711.03−0.31
Headshot %50%64%−14pp

Measured 9 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate57.1%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy2.8%13.2%13.7%10.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.121.071.09above
Match win rate50.2%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOmkxr 危FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER27,692 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning44
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY7525Last 10075%Win rateLWWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · −80ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch3.0

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics9.4
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time609ms+58ms
first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–0 · mirage, 2 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · mirage, 2 Aug
219msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · dust2, 21 Jul
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 7 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

15Longest win streak
43In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 12anubisWeakest map · 50% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS3428682%-0.00
dust2S3224875%-0.01
infernoS1210283%0.01
ancientA95456%-0.02
anubisB63350%-0.03
nuke42250%-0.01
cache330100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,099Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
1,620Matches
50.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
57.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
2.8%Shot accuracy
4,150MVPs
612Hours (in match)
1,474Bombs planted
381Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,327dust2
2,054inferno
1,070nuke
349vertigo
92train
8italy
5ar_baggage
5sugarcane

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

324Matches
52%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
80.3ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9749%1.0516.4
Dust27355%1.0315.9
Mirage5754%1.1117.5
Anubis4058%0.9514.6
Inferno2442%1.0617.5
Overpass1844%1.1316.1
Nuke875%1.0015.0
Cache650%0.9613.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.5%Spray accuracy
92.4%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
586msReaction time
17.8%T opening success
40.4%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
11.75HE damage / grenade
3.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.8418 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.7821% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust22–13-0.0311%10 Sept
mirage13–110.0122%5 Sept
inferno13–90.0931%5 Sept
dust23–13-0.0312%4 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0237%3 Sept
ancient0–13-0.0433%29 Aug
nuke13–90.0020%29 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0014%29 Aug
cache13–3-0.0518%29 Aug
dust22–10-0.130%29 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0333%29 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0115%23 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0124%19 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0523%18 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0215%9 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0221%9 Aug
anubis13–50.0413%9 Aug
mirage0–13-0.150%9 Aug
anubis0–13-0.060%9 Aug
dust216–140.0428%9 Aug
dust26–13-0.0124%9 Aug
mirage13–00.000%7 Aug
dust213–0-0.0111%7 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0754%7 Aug
mirage13–0-0.009%7 Aug
mirage13–10.0860%7 Aug
dust213–5-0.0736%7 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0838%7 Aug
dust22–00.0133%7 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0225%7 Aug
ancient13–70.0927%6 Aug
mirage13–70.0929%5 Aug
mirage13–30.0129%5 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0633%5 Aug
dust213–10.0620%5 Aug
cache13–20.1223%5 Aug
mirage13–20.0218%4 Aug
dust213–40.0740%4 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0237%4 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0919%2 Aug
mirage13–00.1550%2 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0330%2 Aug
dust213–1-0.0424%2 Aug
mirage3–00.02100%2 Aug
dust27–00.0919%2 Aug
inferno13–00.0639%2 Aug
inferno3–00.0133%2 Aug
dust27–13-0.1015%2 Aug
inferno2–00.000%2 Aug
dust28–13-0.0217%2 Aug
mirage13–40.0138%2 Aug
dust24–1-0.0319%2 Aug
mirage13–10.0629%2 Aug
dust213–00.0936%1 Aug
dust213–0-0.0727%1 Aug
dust213–1-0.0111%1 Aug
dust213–00.0524%1 Aug
mirage13–20.0026%1 Aug
dust213–3-0.0414%1 Aug
mirage3–00.000%1 Aug
dust213–00.0133%1 Aug
dust213–00.0114%1 Aug
inferno13–00.0730%1 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0833%31 Jul
mirage4–13-0.1220%31 Jul
mirage13–0-0.0340%31 Jul
inferno13–20.0131%31 Jul
dust213–00.0622%31 Jul
mirage13–00.0120%31 Jul
ancient13–0-0.0117%31 Jul
ancient13–0-0.0330%31 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0517%31 Jul
dust213–1-0.0217%31 Jul
dust27–2-0.0418%31 Jul
nuke4–00.000%31 Jul
mirage13–20.0118%31 Jul
dust213–50.0227%31 Jul
dust213–1-0.0117%31 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0424%31 Jul
mirage13–10.0420%31 Jul
dust26–13-0.1311%30 Jul
dust213–1-0.0331%30 Jul
dust23–00.000%30 Jul
mirage13–00.000%30 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0214%30 Jul
anubis4–00.0014%30 Jul
inferno13–10.029%30 Jul
ancient13–1-0.0122%30 Jul
cache13–1-0.085%30 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0129%30 Jul
inferno13–30.0237%30 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0427%29 Jul
mirage13–20.0523%29 Jul
dust213–30.0322%29 Jul
mirage3–00.00100%24 Jul
inferno0–13-0.060%23 Jul
inferno13–30.0233%23 Jul
mirage0–130.000%21 Jul
dust21–13-0.040%21 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0733%21 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches15-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →