Fembrot

Fembrot — CS2 Stats

76561199015545878[U:1:1055280150]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

677Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,213Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,530Blue band · top ~41.5% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 8 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,530 -1,063 8 Aug18 Sept · 20 days played
10,74913,859peak 13,8598 Aug18 Sept
13,859Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-08-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,329 below peak (13,859)
  • +211 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,470 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate50.9%41.9%44.3%above
Shot accuracy5.5%9.6%11.8%6.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.100.981.03above
Match win rate43.1%43.8%45.2%2.2% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFembrotPREMIER12,530 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning63
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY414910Last 10041%Win rateLWLWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility2.8
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels6.1
Clutch1.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.3
Utility2.8
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels5.9
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time534ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 1 Sept
48%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · inferno, 12 Aug
352msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · inferno, 2 Sept
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 28% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD33112233%-0.03
nukeD2571828%-0.01
ancientC156940%-0.01
cacheA95456%0.01
dust2S86275%0.02
anubisB63350%0.02
mirage220100%0.08
train1010%-0.07
overpass110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

31,329Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 25% of Blue band
2,190Matches
43.1%Match win rate
50.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Blue band
5.5%Shot accuracy
7,183MVPs
488Hours (in match)
1,355Bombs planted
483Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,567inferno
3,233nuke
2,470dust2
439lake
165vertigo
128office
37train
32cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

95Matches
45%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
93.5ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22442%0.8915.5
Nuke2357%1.2418.8
Ancient1553%1.3420.1
Overpass1040%1.2018.4
Anubis933%1.0115.3
Inferno540%0.9013.8
Mirage450%0.9814.5
Cache425%1.4416.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
531msReaction time
53.8%T opening success
53.2%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
6.55HE damage / grenade
4.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.489 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke2–130.0142%18 Sept
cache13–10-0.0122%18 Sept
inferno9–130.0025%18 Sept
dust213–3-0.0532%18 Sept
cache13–50.0417%18 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0120%18 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0418%18 Sept
nuke13–110.0130%18 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0119%18 Sept
inferno16–130.0024%18 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0626%17 Sept
inferno4–9-0.1425%17 Sept
inferno1–9-0.1620%17 Sept
inferno4–9-0.210%17 Sept
dust213–110.0543%5 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0222%5 Sept
ancient13–60.0740%5 Sept
inferno8–80.1238%5 Sept
anubis13–2-0.0211%5 Sept
anubis7–130.0115%5 Sept
ancient13–2-0.0523%4 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0713%3 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0222%3 Sept
anubis13–90.0117%3 Sept
cache9–13-0.0221%3 Sept
ancient8–130.0326%2 Sept
inferno2–9-0.0913%2 Sept
mirage13–50.0937%2 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0315%2 Sept
ancient13–70.0118%2 Sept
ancient13–3-0.0417%1 Sept
anubis13–50.1520%1 Sept
nuke13–110.0720%1 Sept
nuke13–30.1920%1 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0218%1 Sept
nuke7–130.0116%31 Aug
cache13–30.1118%31 Aug
ancient13–100.0213%30 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0317%30 Aug
inferno11–130.0125%30 Aug
dust28–20.0816%29 Aug
nuke6–130.0229%29 Aug
nuke7–9-0.1022%28 Aug
dust29–130.0934%27 Aug
inferno9–50.1218%27 Aug
inferno9–5-0.1414%26 Aug
ancient15–150.0113%20 Aug
inferno2–9-0.0714%20 Aug
inferno9–30.0812%20 Aug
nuke9–30.1332%20 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0519%19 Aug
inferno9–60.0817%19 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0721%18 Aug
cache7–4-0.0520%18 Aug
cache5–13-0.0927%17 Aug
dust23–130.0129%17 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0726%16 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0231%16 Aug
cache11–130.0725%16 Aug
train3–13-0.0716%15 Aug
inferno13–60.0920%15 Aug
dust213–100.0324%14 Aug
cache13–90.0126%14 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0522%14 Aug
nuke6–9-0.0517%14 Aug
nuke5–9-0.0914%14 Aug
inferno2–9-0.2118%14 Aug
nuke6–130.0233%13 Aug
nuke3–13-0.028%13 Aug
inferno8–80.0922%13 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0915%13 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0817%13 Aug
nuke9–4-0.0229%13 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0228%12 Aug
inferno8–80.0348%12 Aug
nuke9–00.150%12 Aug
nuke5–9-0.0720%12 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0627%11 Aug
ancient8–130.0023%11 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0222%11 Aug
dust213–10-0.013%11 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0915%10 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0224%10 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0624%10 Aug
inferno13–70.0336%10 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0123%10 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0431%10 Aug
inferno8–80.0726%10 Aug
inferno6–90.027%10 Aug
dust213–2-0.0419%9 Aug
mirage13–30.0721%9 Aug
inferno8–8-0.036%9 Aug
inferno7–90.0035%9 Aug
overpass9–5-0.0435%9 Aug
nuke6–9-0.0314%9 Aug
cache1–13-0.0214%8 Aug
nuke8–80.1027%8 Aug
nuke2–9-0.0627%8 Aug
inferno9–6-0.084%8 Aug
nuke2–9-0.2430%8 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →