𝖉𝖆𝖉𝖉𝖞 𝖇𝖑𝖆𝖈𝖐 𝖘𝖆𝖈𝖐✍ — CS2 Stats

AQ76561199014569318[U:1:1054303590]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,012Tracked matches52%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating14,242Blue band · top ~32.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#156738 of 260020 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Oct 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,242 +1,616 2 Sept – 18 Oct · 9 days played

14,550Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,082Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

41Days played since 2026-08-25

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,082
Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 119 to go
Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

88 below peak (14,330)
+995 over 30 days · improving
Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 758 to go
Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning67

Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT41–52–7Last 10041%Win rateWWLWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

7–3 · 70% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 589ms

Last 20

11–8–1 · 55% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.1

Utility3.6

Positioning6.7

Opening Duels5.5

Clutch4.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 67% on T to 45% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning6.7

Utility3.6

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels6.5

Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time597ms−19ms

first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms

Headshot accuracy16.3%+1.0%

first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 12–12 · dust2, 21 Sept →

33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 3 Sept →

367msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · dust2, 20 Sept →

13–0Biggest win · mirage, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

3–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 48% over 21cacheWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	42	18–24	43%	0.02
mirage	B	21	10–11	48%	0.01
nuke	C	16	6–10	38%	0.02
cache	D	10	3–7	30%	0.02
vertigo	D	6	2–4	33%	0.02
inferno	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
ancient	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

79Matches

53%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

89.2ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	23	57%	1.13	16.2
Dust2	14	64%	1.23	20.2
Nuke	12	50%	1.11	18.2
Vertigo	8	25%	1.05	15.1
Inferno	8	62%	1.13	16.9
Ancient	6	50%	1.11	20.0
Anubis	4	25%	0.86	16.5
Cache	3	67%	0.81	10.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy

37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.9%Spray accuracy

80.4%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

594msReaction time

66.7%T opening success

45.4%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

7.2%Flash assists

8.95HE damage / grenade

2.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4768 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–8	0.02	20%	27 Oct →
mirage	13–7	-0.06	13%	27 Oct →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	19%	27 Oct →
vertigo	13–11	0.04	11%	27 Oct →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	14%	27 Oct →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	18%	26 Oct →
vertigo	13–6	0.03	29%	26 Oct →
nuke	13–10	0.02	15%	25 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.12	23%	24 Oct →
nuke	10–13	0.04	9%	23 Oct →
dust2	10–13	0.06	15%	23 Oct →
cache	13–6	0.04	8%	22 Oct →
mirage	5–13	0.02	15%	22 Oct →
nuke	9–13	0.05	15%	22 Oct →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	12%	20 Oct →
dust2	12–12	0.06	16%	20 Oct →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	23%	20 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.07	18%	20 Oct →
mirage	13–7	0.11	16%	19 Oct →
dust2	7–13	0.02	28%	18 Oct →
cache	13–4	0.01	21%	18 Oct →
anubis	15–15	0.01	17%	18 Oct →
dust2	13–4	0.07	14%	18 Oct →
mirage	4–13	0.00	14%	17 Oct →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	11%	15 Oct →
vertigo	11–13	0.07	13%	15 Oct →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	12%	10 Oct →
cache	15–15	-0.01	11%	7 Oct →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	17%	7 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.05	18%	7 Oct →
nuke	13–8	0.00	31%	6 Oct →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	7%	5 Oct →
cache	4–13	-0.07	17%	5 Oct →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	16%	1 Oct →
vertigo	5–13	0.06	12%	1 Oct →
inferno	13–9	0.02	11%	1 Oct →
cache	10–13	0.10	19%	1 Oct →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	8%	1 Oct →
mirage	8–13	0.03	14%	1 Oct →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	14%	1 Oct →
ancient	13–10	0.03	16%	30 Sept →
cache	9–13	0.02	15%	30 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.00	24%	30 Sept →
dust2	10–13	0.11	16%	29 Sept →
nuke	8–13	0.08	15%	28 Sept →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	25%	28 Sept →
mirage	9–13	0.03	20%	28 Sept →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	6%	27 Sept →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	22%	27 Sept →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	25%	27 Sept →
mirage	11–13	0.03	15%	25 Sept →
vertigo	6–13	-0.03	17%	25 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.01	23%	25 Sept →
mirage	13–0	0.10	13%	23 Sept →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	3%	23 Sept →
dust2	12–12	0.12	15%	23 Sept →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	17%	23 Sept →
dust2	12–12	0.03	13%	22 Sept →
mirage	8–13	0.03	28%	21 Sept →
dust2	12–12	0.14	22%	21 Sept →
dust2	2–13	-0.12	13%	20 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.00	15%	20 Sept →
nuke	7–13	-0.00	23%	20 Sept →
dust2	13–9	0.07	21%	20 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.04	15%	18 Sept →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	22%	16 Sept →
dust2	5–13	0.06	22%	16 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.04	14%	15 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.09	23%	15 Sept →
nuke	0–6	0.02	0%	15 Sept →
dust2	13–9	0.09	8%	14 Sept →
dust2	7–13	0.01	15%	11 Sept →
mirage	7–0	0.05	23%	11 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.05	17%	11 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.02	10%	7 Sept →
dust2	13–1	-0.04	15%	7 Sept →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	12%	5 Sept →
dust2	7–13	0.05	18%	5 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.07	10%	5 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.07	14%	5 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.01	21%	5 Sept →
dust2	6–13	0.00	11%	5 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.04	20%	4 Sept →
nuke	7–13	-0.00	23%	4 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.02	33%	3 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.02	23%	2 Sept →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	18%	2 Sept →
nuke	13–4	0.03	13%	1 Sept →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	12%	1 Sept →
cache	5–13	0.03	19%	31 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	7%	31 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	18%	31 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	21%	28 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.01	12%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.05	5%	27 Aug →
cache	3–13	0.03	14%	27 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	21%	26 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	-0.04	9%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	8%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.04	17%	25 Aug →