✪FGG✪Cr0zzY3 — CS2 Stats

76561199014197323[U:1:1053931595]

1,707Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,036Hours in CS38Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,124Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2809 of 21121 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,710 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪FGG✪Cr0zzY3FACEITLevel 8 · 1,710 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,124 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning47
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52453Last 10052%Win rateLWWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3
Aggression4.3
Utility4.7
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.7
Utility4.7
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time559ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–4
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 61% over 23anubisWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2314961%0.01
mirageB20101050%-0.01
anubisC146843%-0.01
ancientA127558%-0.01
infernoB115645%-0.03
nukeB84450%-0.01
overpassB63350%0.00
cache32167%0.01
train110100%-0.00
vertigo1010%0.02
italy1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

104,546Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
4,653Matches
37.1%Match win rate
58.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
13.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
7,298MVPs
1,892Hours (in match)
2,538Bombs planted
895Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4748,383
AWP10,408
SSG 081,593
MP91,228
FAMAS1,227

Lifetime map wins

5,094inferno
3,480nuke
2,594dust2
2,306vertigo
1,515train
505cbble
247lake
145office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

420Matches
53%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
71.4ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5062%0.8913.2
Anubis3456%0.9414.3
Ancient2952%1.0214.6
Vertigo2548%0.9312.5
Inferno2055%1.0715.2
Nuke1963%0.9515.3
Dust21338%0.8112.6
Overpass617%0.7211.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
75.9%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
557msReaction time
29.5%T opening success
32.0%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
9.20HE damage / grenade
10.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.4807% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–130.0624%28 Aug
dust213–80.0215%28 Aug
inferno13–6-0.1227%27 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0512%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.028%27 Aug
nuke13–30.0318%27 Aug
dust213–1-0.0817%26 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0122%26 Aug
dust24–13-0.0525%26 Aug
mirage13–20.0623%26 Aug
nuke13–40.0527%26 Aug
ancient13–40.0931%26 Aug
dust213–70.0512%25 Aug
dust24–130.0530%25 Aug
dust26–130.0326%25 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0621%25 Aug
inferno13–50.0032%24 Aug
mirage13–100.0422%21 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0221%19 Aug
ancient9–130.0018%19 Aug
dust21–13-0.0513%15 Aug
cache13–30.0228%14 Aug
cache13–11-0.0426%22 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0315%22 Mar
anubis14–16-0.0115%22 Mar
inferno13–20.1027%22 Mar
nuke6–9-0.1026%22 Mar
overpass13–110.0325%19 Mar
mirage13–20.0723%19 Mar
dust213–8-0.0019%15 Mar
ancient16–14-0.0031%15 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0334%15 Mar
dust213–90.0832%15 Mar
anubis15–15-0.0032%15 Mar
ancient13–6-0.0245%15 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0742%13 Mar
dust210–13-0.0510%11 Mar
dust213–10-0.0433%11 Mar
ancient13–60.0520%11 Mar
mirage13–50.0213%11 Mar
inferno2–13-0.0821%11 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0019%8 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0314%8 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0020%8 Mar
nuke13–30.0332%8 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0822%8 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0323%8 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0126%8 Mar
anubis5–130.0118%8 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0513%5 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0226%5 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0519%5 Mar
mirage12–160.0128%1 Mar
dust213–40.1539%26 Feb
dust26–130.0126%26 Feb
anubis10–130.0018%26 Feb
dust213–70.0630%25 Feb
dust213–40.0523%25 Feb
train13–4-0.0015%22 Feb
dust27–10.0913%22 Feb
overpass13–80.0915%22 Feb
dust29–13-0.0423%21 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0021%20 Feb
vertigo12–120.0212%20 Feb
italy11–130.0024%20 Feb
anubis13–40.0623%19 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0517%19 Feb
inferno10–130.0024%19 Feb
inferno13–110.0018%19 Feb
anubis6–13-0.098%18 Feb
dust29–13-0.0622%18 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0523%18 Feb
overpass10–130.0023%18 Feb
dust213–30.0120%18 Feb
mirage16–12-0.0216%18 Feb
mirage8–130.0320%17 Feb
dust213–9-0.0218%17 Feb
dust27–60.0133%17 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0513%16 Feb
mirage13–70.0618%16 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0118%16 Feb
nuke7–13-0.058%15 Feb
mirage16–13-0.0319%15 Feb
nuke16–14-0.0317%15 Feb
anubis13–90.0424%15 Feb
anubis16–130.0717%15 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0316%15 Feb
ancient1–13-0.0540%14 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0919%14 Feb
mirage6–130.0320%14 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0625%14 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0126%14 Feb
overpass3–13-0.0614%13 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0119%13 Feb
overpass14–16-0.0425%12 Feb
anubis13–70.0330%12 Feb
dust213–40.0128%12 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0726%12 Feb
ancient13–30.0317%12 Feb
dust28–13-0.0519%11 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →