siisselinixu

siisselinixu — CS2 Stats

FI76561199012502092[U:1:1052236364]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,142Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,350Hours in CS
CSDB Rating2.0 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating1,147Grey band · top ~95.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,142 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 5 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 1,147 -1,847 5 Jan14 Sept · 27 days played
1,1474,423peak 4,4235 Jan14 Sept
4,524Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,153Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-01-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,276 below peak (4,423)
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 3,853 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 14 Sep 2026 and 21 Sep 2026.

Measured 14 Sep 202621 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate50.3%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy11.3%12.0%12.4%1.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.741.021.040.30 short
Match win rate39.8%44.7%45.2%5.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsiisselinixuFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER1,147 · Grey bandPEAK ELO1,153csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim8
Positioning28
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45523Last 10045%Win rateLLLLTLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.2pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 041 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 802ms

Last 10

  • 271 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 766ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 786ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim0.8
Utility4.3
Positioning2.8
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 52% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 791ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim0.8
Positioning2.8
Utility4.3
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact0.2

Composite 2.0/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time779ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 778ms → last ⅓ avg 779ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%−4.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 6 Jan
36%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · mirage, 29 Jan
469msFastest reaction time · 9–3 · inferno, 26 Jan
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 22 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 14ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C43192444%-0.03
infernoB178947%-0.01
nukeC146843%-0.02
mirageA149564%-0.01
ancientD72529%-0.06
anubis31233%-0.05
overpass1010%-0.09
train1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

90,825Lifetime kills
0.74K/D
5,496Matches
39.8%Match win rate
50.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
11.3%Shot accuracy
10,378MVPs
2,350Hours (in match)
6,019Bombs planted
705Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

26,036dust2
15,129inferno
2,739nuke
1,836train
390vertigo
53office
35cbble
26lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

121Matches
50%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
76.9ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23367%0.9414.0
Anubis2741%0.9013.5
Inferno2548%1.0113.9
Ancient1747%0.8912.9
Mirage617%0.6311.8
Train560%0.9116.2
Overpass367%0.528.0
Nuke10%0.7915.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.9%Headshot accuracy
22.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
24.0%Spray accuracy
66.5%Counter-strafing
13.6°Preaim
791msReaction time
23.1%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
10.68HE damage / grenade
3.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.6157° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.9311% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 790.9596ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–13-0.0421%11 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0332%9 Mar
inferno6–13-0.127%8 Mar
dust27–13-0.1313%8 Mar
dust212–120.0017%5 Mar
dust24–13-0.107%1 Mar
dust213–20.0210%22 Feb
nuke10–13-0.077%22 Feb
inferno13–80.0615%22 Feb
inferno8–13-0.026%19 Feb
dust22–11-0.0522%19 Feb
inferno13–11-0.079%19 Feb
dust26–13-0.0612%19 Feb
dust210–13-0.0317%16 Feb
inferno7–13-0.1012%16 Feb
dust213–70.0113%16 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0315%15 Feb
dust213–8-0.0115%15 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0118%15 Feb
mirage13–50.0423%15 Feb
dust213–7-0.0514%15 Feb
dust23–13-0.0930%14 Feb
dust211–13-0.085%14 Feb
inferno2–130.0114%12 Feb
anubis13–8-0.049%12 Feb
dust216–14-0.0114%11 Feb
dust24–13-0.059%11 Feb
dust211–13-0.0618%9 Feb
inferno7–90.0926%9 Feb
dust213–40.0025%9 Feb
nuke15–15-0.0020%8 Feb
dust213–110.0121%8 Feb
nuke16–120.0030%8 Feb
ancient13–3-0.0410%8 Feb
dust27–13-0.0419%8 Feb
dust29–13-0.0816%8 Feb
dust24–13-0.0622%5 Feb
mirage13–90.0212%5 Feb
dust213–8-0.0024%4 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0131%4 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0319%4 Feb
nuke13–50.0023%4 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0119%4 Feb
inferno13–100.0422%4 Feb
dust213–80.0826%4 Feb
dust27–130.0117%4 Feb
dust216–13-0.0620%3 Feb
nuke2–13-0.0323%29 Jan
dust28–13-0.0116%29 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0436%29 Jan
inferno13–80.0614%29 Jan
inferno16–14-0.0811%28 Jan
overpass8–13-0.0916%28 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0521%28 Jan
nuke13–50.0412%28 Jan
dust213–10-0.0319%26 Jan
mirage16–140.0118%26 Jan
mirage13–50.0217%26 Jan
inferno9–30.1111%26 Jan
mirage1–13-0.084%26 Jan
inferno12–12-0.0126%25 Jan
dust213–8-0.0123%25 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0815%23 Jan
dust213–11-0.0218%22 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0910%22 Jan
ancient12–16-0.057%19 Jan
dust27–13-0.0319%15 Jan
anubis1–13-0.0421%15 Jan
mirage13–40.029%15 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0129%15 Jan
mirage13–10-0.059%15 Jan
dust213–5-0.0013%15 Jan
dust26–13-0.0524%14 Jan
dust26–13-0.0820%14 Jan
dust213–70.0323%14 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0129%14 Jan
dust212–160.0221%14 Jan
dust213–8-0.067%12 Jan
dust26–13-0.0110%12 Jan
ancient3–13-0.0629%12 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0418%12 Jan
dust27–130.0122%12 Jan
inferno13–8-0.069%12 Jan
ancient10–13-0.048%12 Jan
inferno2–13-0.0915%12 Jan
dust26–13-0.0417%11 Jan
ancient3–13-0.0825%11 Jan
nuke11–13-0.087%11 Jan
dust213–10-0.0422%11 Jan
dust26–13-0.0729%11 Jan
nuke13–6-0.0825%11 Jan
ancient13–8-0.0623%11 Jan
nuke9–130.0220%6 Jan
nuke13–60.0426%6 Jan
train10–130.0032%6 Jan
mirage10–130.0321%6 Jan
dust213–70.1125%6 Jan
dust23–13-0.0325%6 Jan
dust213–20.0422%6 Jan
mirage13–3-0.0527%5 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →