retired

retired — CS2 Stats

AQ76561199011889040[U:1:1051623312]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

705Tracked matches73%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#70273 of 247904 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1Tracked matches · now 705
−3.3ppWin rate · 76.7% → 73.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,673 +2,212 12 Jul – 15 Sept · 5 days played
18,46120,673peak 20,67312 Jul15 Sept
20,673Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-05-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGretiredFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning48
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateLLWLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 496ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility5.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch5.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 47 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning4.8
Utility5.3
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time509ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 509ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 5–0 · anubis, 11 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 29 May →
297msFastest reaction time · 5–0 · anubis, 12 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 25 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 85% over 13infernoWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC187–1139%0.05
cacheB178–947%0.03
ancientA1610–663%0.04
anubisS1311–285%0.05
mirageS128–467%0.03
dust2A95–456%0.01
infernoC83–538%0.04
fachwerk—21–150%0.04
boulder—20–20%0.00
shelter—11–0100%0.04
vertigo—10–10%-0.01
train—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

70Matches
63%Win rate
1.62Avg K/D
96.1ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2268%1.7420.1
Anubis1765%1.5017.5
Dust2838%1.3214.8
Nuke771%1.7424.7
Inferno757%1.4719.0
Ancient580%1.7222.6
Cache2100%3.1631.0
Train10%0.6710.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
42.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
87.2%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
505msReaction time
27.1%T opening success
48.8%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
10.61HE damage / grenade
8.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.1213% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0521%19 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0320%31 Aug →
anubis13–80.0527%31 Aug →
cache6–130.0629%31 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0124%28 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0539%28 Aug →
ancient13–90.0215%28 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0615%28 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.017%25 Aug →
anubis16–140.0418%25 Aug →
ancient13–00.1131%25 Aug →
anubis13–100.0316%24 Aug →
anubis13–10.1026%24 Aug →
anubis13–50.0414%24 Aug →
ancient13–70.0827%24 Aug →
mirage13–30.0639%24 Aug →
nuke1–130.0223%23 Aug →
fachwerk13–50.0925%22 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0322%21 Aug →
ancient13–90.0222%20 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0122%19 Aug →
inferno5–130.0427%19 Aug →
mirage13–70.0218%18 Aug →
inferno13–80.0723%18 Aug →
mirage13–20.1624%18 Aug →
dust213–90.0333%14 Aug →
inferno13–110.0224%14 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0317%14 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0018%14 Aug →
inferno8–130.0125%13 Aug →
cache13–80.0316%13 Aug →
nuke11–130.0922%13 Aug →
anubis13–100.0833%13 Aug →
mirage13–70.1325%13 Aug →
mirage13–70.0632%12 Aug →
mirage10–130.0019%12 Aug →
nuke14–160.0627%5 Aug →
nuke12–120.0625%4 Aug →
inferno13–110.0720%4 Aug →
shelter10–80.0420%4 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0323%4 Aug →
boulder10–130.0417%4 Aug →
vertigo11–13-0.0111%26 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0010%26 Jul →
cache13–70.2328%26 Jul →
ancient13–50.0336%26 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0217%26 Jul →
anubis13–110.0423%25 Jul →
mirage11–130.0320%25 Jul →
nuke13–90.0827%25 Jul →
train12–12-0.0116%24 Jul →
inferno8–130.0217%24 Jul →
anubis10–130.0016%24 Jul →
nuke13–110.0710%22 Jul →
anubis13–40.0123%22 Jul →
anubis7–130.0113%22 Jul →
fachwerk9–13-0.0112%15 Jul →
nuke9–60.0710%14 Jul →
nuke7–130.0821%12 Jul →
anubis5–0-0.050%12 Jul →
nuke13–50.0323%12 Jul →
boulder10–13-0.0419%12 Jul →
cache12–160.0913%11 Jul →
ancient10–130.0719%11 Jul →
anubis5–00.2526%11 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0515%11 Jul →
cache13–10.1239%11 Jul →
ancient8–130.0416%11 Jul →
nuke13–60.0518%11 Jul →
dust21–13-0.0713%10 Jul →
inferno7–130.0519%10 Jul →
cache7–30.0521%10 Jul →
dust213–20.1411%10 Jul →
cache10–130.0014%9 Jul →
ancient14–160.0516%9 Jul →
cache13–80.0521%9 Jul →
nuke6–130.0013%9 Jul →
ancient13–50.0218%9 Jul →
cache13–60.0619%9 Jul →
ancient16–130.0321%6 Jul →
inferno8–130.0123%6 Jul →
nuke7–130.0720%6 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0816%6 Jul →
nuke1–90.0923%6 Jul →
ancient4–130.0820%6 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0017%5 Jul →
ancient13–40.1115%5 Jul →
dust213–90.0126%5 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0417%5 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0421%3 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0210%3 Jul →
cache13–90.0216%3 Jul →
dust25–130.0324%3 Jul →
dust27–130.0219%24 Jun →
cache9–130.0213%8 Jun →
nuke13–70.1021%3 Jun →
nuke8–80.0013%3 Jun →
nuke13–80.0431%3 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0450%29 May →
anubis13–70.0824%29 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.