MBanger

MBanger — CS2 Stats

DE76561199011314583[U:1:1051048855]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,209Tracked matches33%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,480Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,122Blue band · top ~54.3% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,122 -5,819 1 Sept – 28 Oct · 32 days played
9,69517,789peak 17,7891 Sept28 Oct
18,064Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 7,667 below peak (17,789)
  • -3,373 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 4,878 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-22
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate45.8%42.0%44.4%above
Shot accuracy9.9%9.6%11.9%2.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.240.981.03above
Match win rate46.6%43.8%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMBangerPREMIER10,122 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning66
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY33–64–3Last 10033%Win rateWWLLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +4.5pp headshot accuracy · +60ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 753ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 752ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 722ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility5.0
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch0.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 711ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning6.6
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels5.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time704ms+50ms
first ⅓ avg 655ms → last ⅓ avg 704ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%−5.1%
first ⅓ avg 26.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–8 · anubis, 2 Sept →
76%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · office, 8 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · office, 8 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · italy, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
W2Current streak
9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 7mirageWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D266–2023%0.00
nukeC218–1338%-0.01
infernoD154–1127%0.02
mirageD91–811%0.05
cacheA95–456%0.01
ancientD72–529%0.03
anubisA74–357%0.08
office—32–167%0.03
vertigo—20–20%0.03
italy—11–0100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

93,910Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 10% of Blue band
4,647Matches
46.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Blue band
45.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Blue band
9.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Blue band
13,047MVPs
1,766Hours (in match)
4,208Bombs planted
835Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP27,037
AK-4716,585
SSG 083,913
FAMAS1,990
MAC-101,837

Lifetime map wins

14,864office
8,446dust2
3,165inferno
2,921nuke
1,726vertigo
631italy
523train
285assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
50%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
80.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21100%1.6016.0
Anubis10%0.6012.0
Ancient1100%1.3619.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
86.6%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
711msReaction time
54.8%T opening success
51.5%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
1.9%Flash assists
10.80HE damage / grenade
5.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 710.6505ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–110.0021%28 Oct →
ancient13–90.0519%28 Oct →
mirage11–130.0319%27 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0533%25 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0425%23 Oct →
nuke13–50.0847%23 Oct →
cache8–130.0522%23 Oct →
inferno13–80.0529%23 Oct →
mirage6–130.0717%23 Oct →
nuke13–110.0219%23 Oct →
dust213–80.1639%15 Oct →
cache16–140.1419%14 Oct →
cache13–160.0115%13 Oct →
nuke13–30.0918%13 Oct →
mirage3–130.1213%13 Oct →
inferno10–130.0816%13 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0523%12 Oct →
nuke13–90.0419%12 Oct →
dust210–130.0220%12 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0125%12 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0313%12 Oct →
mirage11–130.0716%12 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0320%12 Oct →
inferno10–130.0620%10 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0623%10 Oct →
cache13–50.0612%10 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0519%8 Oct →
nuke7–130.0924%7 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0531%1 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0133%30 Sept →
vertigo5–130.0411%29 Sept →
nuke0–5-0.0820%26 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0319%26 Sept →
ancient11–130.0923%26 Sept →
dust24–130.0229%26 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0121%26 Sept →
italy13–20.0826%26 Sept →
office5–13-0.0238%26 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0115%26 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0626%24 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0420%23 Sept →
inferno13–80.1140%22 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.006%20 Sept →
nuke7–9-0.1114%19 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0745%19 Sept →
nuke9–4-0.0121%19 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0432%19 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0528%19 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0346%19 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0631%17 Sept →
anubis2–130.0316%17 Sept →
nuke2–9-0.096%17 Sept →
inferno6–90.0727%17 Sept →
nuke4–90.0221%15 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0524%15 Sept →
nuke8–80.0848%15 Sept →
ancient0–13-0.0246%15 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0518%15 Sept →
anubis10–20.0233%13 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0519%13 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0027%12 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0116%12 Sept →
office13–80.0718%12 Sept →
ancient9–130.0726%11 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0312%11 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0416%11 Sept →
anubis13–20.1432%11 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0720%11 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0229%10 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0424%10 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0223%10 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0027%10 Sept →
inferno9–130.0121%9 Sept →
dust21–13-0.038%9 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0647%9 Sept →
inferno14–160.0216%9 Sept →
mirage7–130.1724%8 Sept →
office13–30.0376%8 Sept →
dust213–90.0523%7 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0026%7 Sept →
dust213–100.1233%7 Sept →
mirage13–50.0625%7 Sept →
ancient13–80.0726%7 Sept →
dust28–130.1727%7 Sept →
nuke9–70.1120%7 Sept →
dust29–130.0218%5 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0124%5 Sept →
dust21–4-0.120%4 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0114%4 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0915%4 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.1035%4 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0824%4 Sept →
dust213–90.0930%3 Sept →
inferno13–90.1928%3 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0330%3 Sept →
nuke4–9-0.0957%3 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0018%2 Sept →
anubis16–140.1535%2 Sept →
anubis13–80.2135%2 Sept →
dust213–110.1327%1 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.