samichenn — CS2 Stats

76561199009656636[U:1:1049390908]

5,777Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,584Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6706 of 24493 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,234 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsamichennFACEITLevel 10 · 2,234 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,584 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning49
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5743Last 10057%Win rateLLWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0
Aggression4.2
Utility4.8
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.9
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time536ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.38Best rating — vertigo 9–4
130Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 72% over 18anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2315865%0.02
infernoA1911858%0.05
dust2S1813572%0.03
ancientC125742%-0.01
cacheB105550%0.04
nukeS64267%0.01
anubisD5050%0.02
vertigoA53260%0.10
debris1010%0.04
boulder110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,245Matches
50%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
81.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage42752%1.1516.2
Ancient27148%1.1216.3
Inferno23751%1.2516.7
Dust223449%1.0815.5
Anubis19946%1.1216.0
Nuke14846%1.2217.5
Vertigo8647%1.2116.8
Overpass6542%1.1416.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.5%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
555msReaction time
24.9%T opening success
33.0%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
10.75HE damage / grenade
8.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4375 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.9068% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–13-0.0311%27 Aug
mirage10–130.0126%25 Aug
mirage3–3-0.070%24 Aug
dust213–40.0816%23 Aug
dust213–110.0417%19 Aug
cache13–4-0.0514%19 Aug
dust213–80.0222%18 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0124%17 Aug
mirage13–100.0213%16 Aug
ancient2–13-0.1020%16 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0323%16 Aug
dust25–13-0.0811%16 Aug
cache4–130.0829%15 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0032%15 Aug
dust213–110.0019%14 Aug
inferno13–70.0419%14 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0814%14 Aug
inferno13–40.1630%13 Aug
inferno13–70.0233%13 Aug
mirage0–2-0.020%13 Aug
cache11–130.0216%12 Aug
dust213–110.0214%12 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0214%12 Aug
nuke7–10.0624%12 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0717%12 Aug
nuke13–8-0.019%12 Aug
mirage13–80.0718%11 Aug
inferno6–12-0.0321%11 Aug
inferno13–20.0717%11 Aug
mirage10–130.0012%11 Aug
mirage13–90.0311%5 Aug
vertigo9–40.3842%5 Aug
debris7–90.0414%5 Aug
ancient7–130.0722%3 Aug
ancient17–19-0.0026%3 Aug
ancient13–40.0418%3 Aug
inferno13–100.0216%3 Aug
inferno13–4-0.024%3 Aug
inferno13–160.0726%2 Aug
dust213–90.0310%2 Aug
dust213–40.078%1 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0337%1 Aug
cache11–13-0.0114%1 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0024%1 Aug
ancient13–80.0115%31 Jul
dust24–13-0.0021%31 Jul
inferno9–70.2418%31 Jul
inferno4–130.0322%31 Jul
mirage9–130.0316%31 Jul
mirage16–140.0116%30 Jul
mirage9–130.1114%29 Jul
cache6–130.0716%29 Jul
dust28–130.0725%28 Jul
dust26–13-0.0422%26 Jul
mirage13–20.0410%26 Jul
inferno2–130.0519%26 Jul
vertigo13–80.0242%25 Jul
dust213–7-0.0616%24 Jul
inferno9–130.0415%23 Jul
vertigo10–130.0325%21 Jul
inferno13–100.0524%20 Jul
mirage13–70.0623%19 Jul
mirage13–70.0220%18 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0218%18 Jul
ancient11–130.0011%16 Jul
ancient13–70.0522%16 Jul
ancient15–19-0.0311%16 Jul
dust213–80.0123%14 Jul
cache13–90.019%14 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0014%14 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0630%14 Jul
cache13–70.0218%13 Jul
inferno13–50.0914%13 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0020%13 Jul
inferno3–130.0112%13 Jul
boulder13–70.0625%12 Jul
nuke13–30.0514%11 Jul
inferno13–90.0312%11 Jul
dust213–10.0421%10 Jul
anubis15–190.1225%10 Jul
cache19–160.0419%9 Jul
vertigo13–30.0811%7 Jul
cache13–80.0725%6 Jul
dust211–130.1314%6 Jul
mirage13–80.0123%6 Jul
mirage5–130.0412%4 Jul
mirage13–80.008%4 Jul
cache11–130.1128%3 Jul
anubis27–31-0.0110%3 Jul
mirage13–90.0224%2 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0220%2 Jul
dust216–120.0727%1 Jul
mirage11–130.0521%1 Jul
dust213–80.0418%30 Jun
nuke8–130.0617%28 Jun
dust213–100.0312%25 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0527%25 Jun
anubis11–130.0116%24 Jun
inferno13–00.1124%24 Jun
mirage13–20.0926%22 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →